Vilena B Figueiredo1,2, Simony L Nascimento, Renata F L Martínez1, Clara T S Lima2, Cristine H J Ferreira3, Patricia Driusso1. 1. Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. 3. Department of Health Sciences, Health Science Department, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto-SP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the effects of individual pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training vs individual training (IT) progressing to group training (GT) vs group-only training in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: Randomized controlled and pragmatic clinical trials with 90 women with SUI. Participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: IT, GT, or four individual sessions progressing to group training (IPGT). The intervention included 12 sessions, once a week, with direct supervision by a physical therapist. PRIMARY OUTCOME: severity according to the King's Health Questionnaire. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: PFM function by palpation and manometer, bladder and exercise diaries, PFM training adherence, and self-efficacy. Reassessments were conducted at the end of the intervention, 3 and 6 months after the intervention. Intra- and intergroup analysis for all outcomes was performed using a multivariate analysis of variance. In the mixed-effects model used, the evaluation groups and times and their interactions were considered. A significance level of 5% was adopted. RESULTS: After the intervention, the severity measure improved in all three groups (P < .001), without difference between them (P = .56). The benefits of the intervention were maintained 3 and 6 months after the end of the supervised training (P < .001). The IPGT group had a significant improvement in PFM function when compared to the other groups posttreatment (P < .001). CONCLUSION:PFM training improved the severity of urinary incontinence in all groups after 12 sessions of training supervised by a physical therapist. IT progressing to GT improved the function of upper PFM when compared to the other groups.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To assess the effects of individual pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training vs individual training (IT) progressing to group training (GT) vs group-only training in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: Randomized controlled and pragmatic clinical trials with 90 women with SUI. Participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: IT, GT, or four individual sessions progressing to group training (IPGT). The intervention included 12 sessions, once a week, with direct supervision by a physical therapist. PRIMARY OUTCOME: severity according to the King's Health Questionnaire. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: PFM function by palpation and manometer, bladder and exercise diaries, PFM training adherence, and self-efficacy. Reassessments were conducted at the end of the intervention, 3 and 6 months after the intervention. Intra- and intergroup analysis for all outcomes was performed using a multivariate analysis of variance. In the mixed-effects model used, the evaluation groups and times and their interactions were considered. A significance level of 5% was adopted. RESULTS: After the intervention, the severity measure improved in all three groups (P < .001), without difference between them (P = .56). The benefits of the intervention were maintained 3 and 6 months after the end of the supervised training (P < .001). The IPGT group had a significant improvement in PFM function when compared to the other groups posttreatment (P < .001). CONCLUSION:PFM training improved the severity of urinary incontinence in all groups after 12 sessions of training supervised by a physical therapist. IT progressing to GT improved the function of upper PFM when compared to the other groups.
Authors: Luiz Augusto Brusaca; Ana Paula Rodrigues Rocha; Linda Cardozo; Ana Beatriz Oliveira; Patricia Driusso Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 1.932