Marta Quézia Silva Fontenele1, Mayle Andrade Moreira1, Anna Caroline Ribeiro de Moura1, Vilena Barros de Figueiredo1,2, Patricia Driusso2, Simony Lira Nascimento3. 1. Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Major Weyne Street, 1440 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60430-450, Brazil. 2. Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Major Weyne Street, 1440 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60430-450, Brazil. simonylira@yahoo.com.br.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between the symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and quality of life (QoL), as well as the function of the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) in women with urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted in two centers in Brazil (Northeast and Southeast regions) with women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Data on pelvic floor symptoms, discomfort and impact on QoL were collected using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-short form (PFDI-SF-20) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) instruments. PFM function was assessed by palpation (PERFECT scale) and manometry. Pearson's correlation test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Student's t test were used to discriminate the differences, adopting a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: A total of 72 women participated in the study (mean age 51.7 ± 11.9 years). The presence and discomfort of pelvic floor symptoms (PFDI-SF-20) were correlated with QoL (PFIQ-7) (r = 0.52, p < 0.001). Deficits in PFM function (power and pressure) were observed, however, there was no correlation between these with the presence and discomfort of the pelvic floor symptoms (PFDI-SF-20). CONCLUSION: Greater discomfort due to PFD symptoms were correlated with a worse QoL. However, the relationship between symptoms and PFM function was not significant. These results reinforce the need to assess the aspects of activity and participation which compose functionality and QoL, and not only the PFM functions in women with UI.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between the symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and quality of life (QoL), as well as the function of the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) in women with urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted in two centers in Brazil (Northeast and Southeast regions) with women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Data on pelvic floor symptoms, discomfort and impact on QoL were collected using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-short form (PFDI-SF-20) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) instruments. PFM function was assessed by palpation (PERFECT scale) and manometry. Pearson's correlation test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Student's t test were used to discriminate the differences, adopting a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: A total of 72 women participated in the study (mean age 51.7 ± 11.9 years). The presence and discomfort of pelvic floor symptoms (PFDI-SF-20) were correlated with QoL (PFIQ-7) (r = 0.52, p < 0.001). Deficits in PFM function (power and pressure) were observed, however, there was no correlation between these with the presence and discomfort of the pelvic floor symptoms (PFDI-SF-20). CONCLUSION: Greater discomfort due to PFD symptoms were correlated with a worse QoL. However, the relationship between symptoms and PFM function was not significant. These results reinforce the need to assess the aspects of activity and participation which compose functionality and QoL, and not only the PFM functions in women with UI.
Entities:
Keywords:
Pelvic floor; Pelvic floor disorders; Quality of life; Urinary incontinence; Women’s health
Authors: José Tadeu Nunes Tamanini; Miriam Dambros; Carlos Arturo Levi D'Ancona; Paulo César Rodrigues Palma; Nelson Rodrigues Netto Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2004-07-08 Impact factor: 2.106
Authors: Viera Svihrova; Jan Svihra; Jan Luptak; Steven Swift; G Alessandro Digesu Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: P Abrams; K E Andersson; L Birder; L Brubaker; L Cardozo; C Chapple; A Cottenden; W Davila; D de Ridder; R Dmochowski; M Drake; C Dubeau; C Fry; P Hanno; J Hay Smith; S Herschorn; G Hosker; C Kelleher; H Koelbl; S Khoury; R Madoff; I Milsom; K Moore; D Newman; V Nitti; C Norton; I Nygaard; C Payne; A Smith; D Staskin; S Tekgul; J Thuroff; A Tubaro; D Vodusek; A Wein; J J Wyndaele Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Muriel K Boreham; Holly E Richter; Kimberly S Kenton; Charles W Nager; W Thomas Gregory; Michael P Aronson; Val Y Vogt; Don D McIntire; Joseph I Schaffer Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 2.894