| Literature DB >> 32352656 |
Roxana Rodríguez-Barrera1, Adrián Flores-Romero1, Elisa García1, Ana Maria Fernández-Presas2, Diego Incontri-Abraham1, Lisset Navarro-Torres1, Julián García-Sánchez1, Juan José Juárez-Vignon Whaley1, Ignacio Madrazo3,4, Antonio Ibarra1,3.
Abstract
AIMS: Immunization with neural-derived peptides (INDP) has demonstrated to be a promising therapy to achieve a regenerative effect in the chronic phase of the spinal cord injury (SCI). Nevertheless, INDP-induced neurogenic effects in the chronic stage of SCI have not been explored. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: A91 peptide; INDP; SCI; chronic stage; motor recovery; neurogenesis; paraplegia; protective autoimmunity; sensitive recovery; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2020 PMID: 32352656 PMCID: PMC7248545 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther ISSN: 1755-5930 Impact factor: 5.243
FIGURE 1INDP induced a significant increase in motor recovery in the chronic stages of SCI. After the intervention, a significantly better motor recovery was observed in the INDP group when compared to the PBS‐immunized one. *Difference between the two treatment groups; P < .001, two‐way ANOVA for repeated measures with Bonferroni's post hoc test. Each point represents the mean ± SD of 9 rats
FIGURE 2A91 immunization improved sensitivity function in the chronic stages of SCI. After the intervention, a significantly better withdrawal threshold was observed in the INDP group when compared to the PBS one. Each point represents the mean ± SD of 9 rats. *Different from the PBS group; P = .02, Student's t test
FIGURE 3Representative microphotograph of BrdU+/DCX+ cells at the central canal, dorsal and ventral horns, and injury site of SC‐injured rats after therapeutic intervention. A and C correspond to the PBS, while B and D correspond to the INDP group. BrdU+ cells (green), Dcx+ cells (red), and BrdU+/Dcx+ cells (yellow). Black squares depict the amplified areas in C and D panels. Arrows indicate double‐labeled cells (neuroblasts). A greater number of double‐labeled cells were found in the INDP‐treated group
FIGURE 4Number of BrdU+/DCX+ cells at the epicenter (E), rostral, and caudal stumps of the SC. The INDP group showed a significant increase in the total number of BrdU/DCX+‐labeled cells (neuroblasts) compared to the PBS group. Bars represent the mean ± SD of five rats. This is one representative graph of three determinations. *Different from PBS, P < .05; one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test
FIGURE 5Concentration of antiinflammatory and pro‐inflammatory cytokines 120 d after SCI. The levels of IL‐4 (A) and IL‐10 (B) in the INDP group were significantly higher than those observed in PBS‐immunized rats. In contrast, the levels of TNF‐α (C) were significantly lower in rats treated with INDP compared to those immunized with PBS alone. Bars represent the mean ± SD of five rats. This is one representative graph of three determinations. *Different from PBS, P < .05; Student's t test
FIGURE 6BDNF and GAP‐43 concentrations 120 d after SCI. The levels of BDNF (A) and GAP‐43 (B) in INDP‐treated rats were significantly higher than those observed in the group immunized with PBS alone. Bars represent the mean ± SD of five rats. This is one representative graph of three determinations. *Different from PBS, P < .05; Student's t test