Literature DB >> 32351868

Biopesticides in India: technology and sustainability linkages.

Jitendra Mishra1, Venkatesh Dutta1,2, Naveen Kumar Arora2.   

Abstract

Despite enhancing the crop yields, the so called green revolution (GR) has proven unsuccessful in assuring long term agricultural sustainability. The methods used for productivity enhancement during GR have not only proven to be problematic but have also resulted in deterioration of soil quality and several other issues related to ecosystems and health issues. The damage was mainly caused by the indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizers and insecticides. Various types of pesticides, are now known to be causing huge problems in the agro-ecosystems. In such a situation, where chemicals have caused or are causing irreversible impacts on agroecosystems, the use of biopesticides has emerged as a sustainable alternative leading to safe organic farming. At the global level, environmentally benign nature and target-specificity of biopesticides are gaining wide popularity. However, in developing countries like India usage of biopesticides is still minuscule in comparison to conventional chemical pesticides. Although the Indian government has encouraged the use of biopesticides by placing them into many of the agricultural schemes, at the grassroots level, biopesticides are facing many challenges. The lower adaptability and declining interest of farmers towards biopesticides have become a matter of concern. However, technological challenges related to production, manufacture and application in agroecosystems have also raised a question on their long-term sustainability. The main objective of this review is to highlight the developing trend in the field of biocontrol products in India. Apart from this, the review also focuses on the technological perspectives that are required for the long-term sustainability of biological control products in Indian agriculture and market. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocontrol; Biopesticides; Formulation technology; Pesticide; Sustainability

Year:  2020        PMID: 32351868      PMCID: PMC7181464          DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02192-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3 Biotech        ISSN: 2190-5738            Impact factor:   2.406


  22 in total

1.  Interaction of water with three granular biopesticide formulations.

Authors:  Margaret E Lyn; Dan Burnett; Armando R Garcia; Ron Gray
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.279

2.  Status of research, regulations and challenges for genetically modified crops in India.

Authors:  Manish Shukla; Khair Tuwair Al-Busaidi; Mala Trivedi; Rajesh K Tiwari
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 3.  Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead.

Authors:  Prabhu L Pingali
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Complete genome sequence of the entomopathogenic and metabolically versatile soil bacterium Pseudomonas entomophila.

Authors:  Nicolas Vodovar; David Vallenet; Stéphane Cruveiller; Zoé Rouy; Valérie Barbe; Carlos Acosta; Laurence Cattolico; Claire Jubin; Aurélie Lajus; Béatrice Segurens; Benoît Vacherie; Patrick Wincker; Jean Weissenbach; Bruno Lemaitre; Claudine Médigue; Frédéric Boccard
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-05-14       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  In-season changes in resistance to insecticides in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in India.

Authors:  Keshav Raj Kranthi; Derek Russell; Ravindra Wanjari; Manoj Kherde; Shyamkant Munje; Nandkishor Lavhe; Nigel Armes
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Water activity, temperature, and pH effects on growth of the biocontrol agent Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2.

Authors:  E Costa; J Usall; N Teixidó; J Delgado; I Viñas
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 7.  Strategies and models for agricultural sustainability in developing Asian countries.

Authors:  P C Kesavan; M S Swaminathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Degradation of Cry1Ab protein from genetically modified maize (MON810) in relation to total dietary feed proteins in dairy cow digestion.

Authors:  Vijay Paul; Patrick Guertler; Steffi Wiedemann; Heinrich H D Meyer
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 9.  Neem--an omnipotent plant: a retrospection.

Authors:  Goutam Brahmachari
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 3.164

10.  Fly ash-based Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis formulation: An ecofriendly approach.

Authors:  Sachin Tikar; Shri Prakash
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  4 in total

1.  Commercialization, Diffusion and Adoption of Bioformulations for Sustainable Disease Management in Indian Arid Agriculture: Prospects and Challenges.

Authors:  Ritu Mawar; B L Manjunatha; Sanjeev Kumar
Journal:  Circ Econ Sustain       Date:  2021-07-11

2.  2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol producing Pseudomonas fluorescens JM-1 for management of ear rot disease caused by Fusarium moniliforme in Zea mays L.

Authors:  Jitendra Mishra; Isha Mishra; Naveen Kumar Arora
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.893

Review 3.  Tapping the Role of Microbial Biosurfactants in Pesticide Remediation: An Eco-Friendly Approach for Environmental Sustainability.

Authors:  Aman Raj; Ashwani Kumar; Joanna Felicity Dames
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Plant-Derived Protectants in Combating Soil-Borne Fungal Infections in Tomato and Chilli.

Authors:  Himanshu Arora; Abhishek Sharma; Peter Poczai; Satyawati Sharma; Farah Farhanah Haron; Abdul Gafur; R Z Sayyed
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.