| Literature DB >> 32351833 |
Diljon S Chahal1, Ravi Parikh2, David Yoo3, Temilolu Aje4, Gautam Ramani5, Mukta C Srivastava6.
Abstract
Background Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of graft failure in cardiac transplant recipients. Progression of intimal thickening noted during routine surveillance intracoronary imaging is associated with the development of CAV. However, mechanisms of CAV development are poorly understood and targets for therapy modification remain elusive. We investigated the association of neovessels (INs) within the intima, noted by optical coherence tomography (OCT) during routine CAV surveillance imaging, with intimal thickening and co-incident CAV. Methods Coronary angiography and OCT images of 45 consecutive cardiac transplant recipients undergoing surveillance coronary imaging were reviewed. The presence of INs, defined as dark, tubular or rotund intimal structures, measuring 50-200 µm in diameter, noted in at least three OCT frames, was quantified. CAV diagnosis was determined by utilizing the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant classification system. Demographic and clinical data was obtained by chart review. Significant associations between the presence of INs and CAV, intimal thickening, and demographic features were evaluated. Results INs were observed in 22/45 evaluated patients (49%), while angiographic CAV was observed in 24/45 patients, with a significant association noted between the presence of INs and CAV (p < 0.001). INs were also associated with increasing intimal thickness (p < 0.001), co-morbid hypertension (p = 0.010), and increasing transplant age (p= 0.002) on multivariate analysis. Conclusion INs are prevalent in cardiac transplant recipients and are significantly associated with CAV, increased intimal thickness, increasing transplant age, and co-morbid hypertension. Further investigation is warranted regarding the temporal relationship of IN development and the onset of CAV, as well as the mechanisms of IN development in this population.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac allograft vasculopathy; intimal neovessels; optic coherence tomography
Year: 2020 PMID: 32351833 PMCID: PMC7188001 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Baseline characteristics
BMI, body mass index; OCT, optical coherence tomography; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CKD, chronic kidney disease as determined by chart review; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MIT, maximal intimal thickness; CAV, cardiac allograft vasculopathy; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range
| Parameter | Neo+ (n=22) | Neo- (n=23) | P value |
| Age, mean (SD) | 58.8 (12.1) | 57.5 (14.8) | 0.955 |
| Male gender | 19 (86.4%) | 19 (82.6%) | 0.728 |
| Black race | 6 (27.3%) | 6 (26.1%) | 0.928 |
| BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) | 27.6 (24.0-2.1) | 26.1 (23.8-29.4) | 0.394 |
| Transplant age, median (IQR) | 6.3 (3.0-8.5) | 2.0 (0.4-4.0) | 0.002 |
| Rejection | 9 (42.9%) | 9 (39.1%) | 0.802 |
| Ischemic cardiomyopathy (pre-transplant) | 6 (27.3%) | 7 (30.4%) | 0.815 |
| Medications at time of OCT | |||
| Steroids | 11 (50.0%) | 13 (56.5%) | 0.661 |
| Cellcept | 16 (72.7%) | 18 (78.3%) | 0.666 |
| Tacrolimus | 17 (77.3%) | 19 (82.6%) | 0.655 |
| CMV history | 4 (18.2%) | 6 (26.1%) | 0.524 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 10 (45.5%) | 12 (52.2%) | 0.652 |
| Hypertension | 22 (100.0%) | 17 (73.9%) | 0.010 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 19 (86.4%) | 19 (82.6%) | 0.728 |
| Active smoking | 1 (4.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.301 |
| CKD | 6 (27.3%) | 12 (52.2%) | 0.088 |
| LVEF post-transplant (%), median (IQR) | 60 (55-65) | 60 (55-65) | 0.953 |
| MIT(μm), median (IQR) | 540 (420-765) | 280 (210-370) | <0.001 |
| CAV | 18 (81.8%) | 6 (26.1%) | <0.001 |
| C4d+ > weak within 1 year of transplant | 8 (40.0%) | 11 (47.8%) | 0.610 |
CAV incidence and grade in the patient cohort
CAV, cardiac allograft vasculopathy
| CAV grade | Number of patients (n = 45) |
| 0 | 21 (46.7%) |
| 1 | 21 (46.7%) |
| 2 | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3 | 3 (6.7%) |
Figure 1Correlation of angiographic CAV with intimal neovessels
The area indicated by the red arrow on the angiogram (Panel B) is evaluated by optic coherence tomography on Panel A. The yellow double-headed arrow indicates intimal thickness. The heavy white arrows highlight intimal neovessels.
CAV, cardiac allograft vasculopathy