Literature DB >> 23680373

Detection and imaging of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Ari Pollack1, Tamim Nazif, Donna Mancini, Giora Weisz.   

Abstract

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among cardiac transplant recipients. CAV occurs in approximately 30% of patients by 5 years and 50% by 10 years, and is a major cause of graft loss and death. Early detection of CAV is important because it may allow alterations in medical therapy before progression to the stage that revascularization is required. This has led to routine screening for CAV in transplant recipients, traditionally by invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Recent advances in imaging technology, specifically intravascular ultrasound, now also permit detection of subangiographic CAV. Noninvasive stress testing and multislice coronary computed tomography angiography have been investigated as noninvasive alternatives to routine ICA. However, currently available noninvasive tests remain limited with respect to their sensitivity and specificity for CAV. Given the multiple available diagnostic modalities, no consensus definition for the classification of CAV has been widely accepted, although new guidelines that rely heavily on ICA have recently been published by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation. This review summarizes imaging modalities that are utilized in the diagnosis and surveillance of CAV and explores newer imaging techniques that may play a future role.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23680373     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  21 in total

Review 1.  Transplant allograft vasculopathy: Role of multimodality imaging in surveillance and diagnosis.

Authors:  Gregory A Payne; Fadi G Hage; Deepak Acharya
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI in heart transplant recipients at rest: repeatability in healthy controls and assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Travis B DeSa; Muhannad A Abbasi; Julie A Blaisdell; Kai Lin; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 1.605

3.  Imaging in patients with advanced therapies for heart failure.

Authors:  Joanna M Joly; Steven G Lloyd
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Should positron emission tomography be the standard of care for non-invasive surveillance following cardiac transplantation?

Authors:  Robert J H Miller; Jon A Kobashigawa; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Interacting mechanisms in the pathogenesis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Jordan S Pober; Dan Jane-wit; Lingfeng Qin; George Tellides
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Increased coronary lipid accumulation in heart transplant recipients with prior high-grade cellular rejection: novel insights from near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bo Zheng; Akiko Maehara; Gary S Mintz; Tamim M Nazif; Yarden Waksman; Fuyu Qiu; Luz Jaquez; LeRoy E Rabbani; Mark A Apfelbaum; Ziad A Ali; Kate Dalton; Lei Song; Ke Xu; Charles C Marboe; Donna M Mancini; Giora Weisz
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Multi-modal imaging of the pediatric heart transplant recipient.

Authors:  Jonathan H Soslow; Margaret M Samyn
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10

8.  Prediction of long-term (> 10 year) cardiovascular outcomes in heart transplant recipients: Value of stress technetium-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Jesse F Veenis; Hendrik J Boiten; Jan C van den Berge; Kadir Caliskan; Alex P W M Maat; Roelf Valkema; Alina A Constantinescu; Olivier C Manintveld; Felix Zijlstra; Ron T van Domburg; Arend F L Schinkel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Reduced Myocardial Flow Reserve by Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Cardiovascular Events After Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Matthew C Konerman; John J Lazarus; Richard L Weinberg; Ravi V Shah; Michael Ghannam; Scott L Hummel; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Keith D Aaronson; Monica M Colvin; Todd M Koelling; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography is inadequate to detect early cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Maryjane A Farr; Susan W Restaino; Ziad A Ali; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 10.247

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.