| Literature DB >> 32351001 |
Abdulhalik Workicho1,2, Tefera Belachew3, Alemayehu Argaw2,3, Alemzewed Roba2,4, Shibani Ghosh5, Meghan Kershaw5, Carl Lachat2, Patrick Kolsteren2.
Abstract
Young maternal age during pregnancy is linked with adverse birth outcomes. This study examined the role of maternal nutritional status in the association between maternal age and small for gestational age (SGA) delivery and birth length. We used data from a birth cohort study in Ethiopia, involving women who were 15-24 years of age and their newborns. A mediation analysis was fitted in a sample of 1,422 mother infant dyads for whom data on birth length were available, and 777 dyads for whom gestational age and birth weight was measured. We used commands, medeff for the mediation analysis and medsens for sensitivity analysis in STATA 14. Maternal nutritional status, measured by mid-upper arm circumference, mediated 21% of the association between maternal age and birth length and 14% of the association with SGA delivery. The average direct effect (ADE) of maternal age on birth length was (β = 0.45, 95% CI [0.17, 0.99]) and the average causal mediated effect (ACME) was (β = 0.12, 95% CI [0.02, 0.15]). We also found an ADE (β = 0.31, 95% CI [0.09, 0.47]) and an ACME of (β = 0.05, 95% CI [0.003, 0.205]) of maternal age on SGA delivery. The sensitivity analysis suggests an unmeasured confounder with a positive correlation of 0.15 and 0.20 between the mediator and the outcome could explain the observed ACME for birth length and SGA, respectively. We cannot make strong causal assertions as the findings suggest the mediator partly explained the total effect of maternal age on both outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent pregnancy; birth cohort; infant growth; intrauterine growth retardation; maternal nutrition; nutritional epidemiology
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32351001 PMCID: PMC7507459 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
FIGURE 1Flow diagram of study participants included in the analysis
FIGURE 2Conceptual model for the mediation analysis with exposure A (maternal age), mediator M (maternal nutritional status), outcome Y (birth length and SGA), covariate C and mediator‐outcome confounder (unmeasured) L which itself can be affected by the exposure
Birth length (cm) and SGA by maternal and child characteristics in a birth cohort study in rural Ethiopian
| Variables | Birth length (cm), mean (SD) ( |
| SGA$
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Educational status | No formal education | 49.29(2.19) | 0.381 | 61(24.3) | 190(75.7) | 0.635 |
| Primary | 49.52(2.25) | 96(21.2) | 357 (78.8) | |||
| Secondary and above | 49.76(2.28) | 16(21.9) | 57(78.1) | |||
| Parity | Primi para | 49.03(2.21) | 0.013 | 88(27.3) | 234(72.7) | 0.004 |
| Multi para | 49.64(2.24) | 85(18.7) | 370(81.3) | |||
| Wealth index | Lowest | 48.99(2.30) | 0.002 | 75(27.6) | 197(72.4) | 0.033 |
| Middle | 49.37(2.17) | 43(19.6) | 177(80.4) | |||
| Highest | 50.10(2.09) | 55(19.3) | 230(80.7) | |||
| Sex of child | Male | 49.93(2.25) | 0.023 | 80(21.3) | 295(78.7) | 0.547 |
| Female | 49.11(2.21) | 93(23.1) | 309(76.9) | |||
Abbreviations: SGA, small for gestational age; SD, standard deviation.
Statistically significant difference among groups at p < 0.05.
Estimates of the mediation analysis with bias‐corrected bootstrap confidence intervals for birth length and SGA delivery
| Outcome | Mediator | Total effect | ADE | ACME | % mediated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth length (cm) | Maternal age | 0.58(0.29, 0.94) | 0.45(0.17, 0.99) | 0.12(0.02, 0.15) | 21 |
| SGA | Maternal age | 0.31(0.09, 0.47) | 0.27(0.08, 0.44) | 0.05(0.003, 0.20) | 14 |
The model was adjusted for maternal education, wealth index, parity and infant sex.
Abbreviations: ACME, average causal mediated effect; ADE, average direct effect; MUAC, mid‐upper arm circumference; SGA, small for gestational age.
Statistical significance at p = 0.05
Results of the sensitivity analysis with the products of R 2 method for both SGA and birth length
| Sensitivity results | Outcomes | |
|---|---|---|
| Birth length (cm) | SGA delivery | |
| Rho at which ACME = 0 | 0.1492 | 0.200 |
| R^2_M*R^2_Y* at which ACME = 0: | 0.0119 | 0.040 |
| R^2_M ~ R^2_Y~ at which ACME = 0: | 0.0106 | 0.031 |
FIGURE 3Graphical presentation of the results from the sensitivity analysis