Literature DB >> 24248997

Use of administrative medical databases in population-based research.

Natalie Gavrielov-Yusim1, Michael Friger.   

Abstract

Administrative medical databases are massive repositories of data collected in healthcare for various purposes. Such databases are maintained in hospitals, health maintenance organisations and health insurance organisations. Administrative databases may contain medical claims for reimbursement, records of health services, medical procedures, prescriptions, and diagnoses information. It is clear that such systems may provide a valuable variety of clinical and demographic information as well as an on-going process of data collection. In general, information gathering in these databases does not initially presume and is not planned for research purposes. Nonetheless, administrative databases may be used as a robust research tool. In this article, we address the subject of public health research that employs administrative data. We discuss the biases and the limitations of such research, as well as other important epidemiological and biostatistical key points specific to administrative database studies.

Keywords:  Cohort studies; EPIDEMIOLOGY; METHODOLOGY

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24248997     DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-202744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  61 in total

Review 1.  [Pain registries and similar data collections : A systematic review].

Authors:  A Freytag; B Scriba; U Kaiser; W Meißner
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Baseline incidence of adverse birth outcomes and infant influenza and pertussis hospitalisations prior to the introduction of influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: a data linkage study of 78 382 mother-infant pairs, Northern Territory, Australia, 1994-2015.

Authors:  L McHugh; R M Andrews; B Leckning; T Snelling; M J Binks
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Use of administrative data in healthcare research.

Authors:  Cristina Mazzali; Piergiorgio Duca
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Key considerations when using health insurance claims data in advanced data analyses: an experience report.

Authors:  Renata Konrad; Wenchang Zhang; Margrét Bjarndóttir; Ruben Proaño
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2019-03-01

5.  Administrative Medical Databases for Clinical Research: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.

Authors:  Alejandro A Rabinstein
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Healthcare Disparities in Outcomes of a Metropolitan Congenital Heart Surgery Center: The Effect of Clinical and Socioeconomic Factors.

Authors:  Jennifer K Peterson; Kirsti G Catton; Shaun P Setty
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-08-28

7.  Invited Commentary: Women's Reproductive Life Spans and Subsequent Inflammatory Profiles-How to Best Measure Reproductive Life Span and the Need for Baseline Assessments.

Authors:  Karen C Schliep
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Strengthening the Learning Health System in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Time to Leverage Big Data and Digital Solutions.

Authors:  Anjali A Wagle; Nino Isakadze; Khurram Nasir; Seth Shay Martin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.113

9.  Validating Publicly Available Crosswalks for Translating ICD-9 to ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Ravinder Kang; Spencer W Trooboff; Kristen S Jahn; Camilo J Martinez; Kayla O Moore; Andrea M Austin; Nancy E Morden; Corinne G Brooks; Jonathan S Skinner; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-10

10.  Sociodemographic characteristics and chronic medical conditions as risk factors for herpes zoster: a population-based study from primary care in Madrid (Spain).

Authors:  María D Esteban-Vasallo; M Felicitas Domínguez-Berjón; Ruth Gil-Prieto; Jenaro Astray-Mochales; Angel Gil de Miguel
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.