| Literature DB >> 32349771 |
Meng Ren1, Jingru Shi1, Jinmeng Jia1, Yongli Guo2,3,4, Xin Ni5,6,7, Tieliu Shi8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Berardinelli-Seip congenital lipodystrophy (BSCL) is a heterogeneous autosomal recessive disorder characterized by an almost total lack of adipose tissue in the body. Mutations in the AGPAT2, BSCL2, CAV1 and PTRF genes define I-IV subtype of BSLC respectively and clinical data indicate that new causative genes remain to be discovered. Here, we retrieved 341 cases from 60 BSCL-related studies worldwide and aimed to explore genotype-phenotype correlations based on mutations of AGPAT2 and BSCL2 genes from 251 cases. We also inferred new candidate genes for BSCL through protein-protein interaction and phenotype-similarity.Entities:
Keywords: Berardinelli-Seip congenital lipodystrophy; Gene prediction; Genotype; Phenotype; Phenotype-similarity; Protein-protein interaction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32349771 PMCID: PMC7191718 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01383-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Fig. 1a A detailed flow chart for the new candidate gene prediction. The green box is the method of protein-protein interaction, and the yellow box is the method of phenotype-similarity. b The sub-network centered on causative proteins. Nodes in red represent the causative proteins. Nodes in green and yellow represent the BSCL-related proteins. Nodes in yellow represent the new candidate proteins we predicted. c BSCL-related phenotypes associated with causative genes and candidate genes
Fig. 2a A bar chart showing the differential distribution of causative genes in different ethnicities. b A heatmap used to show the correlation between any two phenotypes. A grid in red indicates that the relationship it represents has passed the statistical test. The value on the grid is used to measure the degree of correlation. c A line graph used to present the expression abundance of causative genes and gene EBP in human tissues
Phenotypical information of entire cohort by BSCL type
| BSCL type I | BSCL type II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender(F/M) | 59/24 | 84/84 | 0.0024 |
| Mean age (y) | 19.21 ± 14.72 | 17.45 ± 12.75 | NS |
| Weight at birth (g) | 2997.27 ± 328.78 | 2999.44 ± 613.61 | NS |
| Age at onset of diabetes mellitus (y) | 17.17 ± 9.95 | 13.24 ± 7.99 | 0.05 |
| Diabetes mellitus (yes) | 43% | 45% | NS |
| Cardiomyopathy (yes) | 10% | 18% | NS |
| Hepatopathy (yes) | 24% | 20% | NS |
| Nephropathy (yes) | 2% | 4% | NS |
| Acromegaly (yes) | 28% | 18% | NS |
| Acanthosis nigricans (yes) | 25% | 30% | NS |
| Hirsutism (yes) | 4% | 7% | NS |
| Cysts in bones (yes) | 16% | 3% | 0.01 |
| Intellectual disability (yes) | 4% | 42% | < 0.0001 |
| Poor growth and short stature (yes) | 4% | 7% | NS |
Abbreviation: NS Not significant. The continuous variable is presented as mean ± standard deviation, and the categorical variable is presented as a percentage
Phenotypical information of entire cohort with BSCL type subdivided by gender
| BSCL type I | BSCL type II | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Female | Male | |||
| Mean age (y) | 20.13 ± 14.26 | 15.24 ± 16.18 | NS | 18.52 ± 13.76 | 16.42 ± 11.68 | NS |
| Weight at birth (g) | 2930 ± 303.3 | 3053.33 ± 366.48 | NS | 2822.86 ± 495.76 | 3081.70 ± 652.73 | NS |
| Age at onset of diabetes mellitus (y) | 16.75 ± 7.74 | 20.5 ± 27.58 | NS | 14.90 ± 8.31 | 10.64 ± 6.92 | 0.05 |
| Diabetes mellitus (yes) | 51% | 25% | 0.05 | 51% | 39% | NS |
| Cardiomyopathy (yes) | 7% | 17% | NS | 14% | 23% | NS |
| Hepatopathy (yes) | 7% | 17% | NS | 19% | 23% | NS |
| Nephropathy (yes) | 2% | 4% | NS | 2% | 6% | NS |
| Acromegaly (yes) | 20% | 46% | NS | 17% | 20% | NS |
| Acanthosis nigricans (yes) | 29% | 17% | 0.01 | 31% | 31% | NS |
| Hirsutism (yes) | 3% | 4% | NS | 8% | 6% | NS |
| Cysts in bones (yes) | 17% | 13% | NS | 2% | 4% | NS |
| Intellectual disability (yes) | 5% | 0% | NS | 33% | 50% | NS |
| Poor growth and short stature (yes) | 3% | 4% | NS | 10% | 4% | NS |
Abbreviation: NS Not significant. The continuous variable is presented as mean ± standard deviation, and the categorical variable is presented as a percentage