Literature DB >> 22180638

On alternative methods for measuring visual field decay: Tobit linear regression.

Richard A Russell, David P Crabb.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 22180638     DOI： 10.1167/iovs.11-8948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN： 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of regression models for serial visual field analysis.

Authors:  Jun Mo Lee; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Esteban Morales; Abdelmonem Afifi; Fei Yu; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Authors:  Rongrong Hu; Lyne Racette; Kelly S Chen; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Nonlinear, multilevel mixed-effects approach for modeling longitudinal standard automated perimetry data in glaucoma.

Authors:  Manoj Pathak; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Optic Nerve Tilt, Crescent, Ovality, and Torsion in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort of Young Adults With and Without Myopia.

Authors:  Wendy L Marsh-Tootle; Elise Harb; Wei Hou; Qinghua Zhang; Heather A Anderson; Katherine Weise; Thomas T Norton; Jane Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  A novel method to predict visual field progression more accurately, using intraocular pressure measurements in glaucoma patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.379
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.