Literature DB >> 32348597

Effects of amusing memes on concern for unappealing species.

Magdalena Lenda1,2, Pjoter Skórka2, Błażej Mazur3, William Sutherland4, Piotr Tryjanowski5, Dawid Moroń6, Erik Meijaard1,7, Hugh P Possingham1,8, Kerrie A Wilson1.   

Abstract

There is limited knowledge of the mechanisms that can inspire people's concern and engagement in the protection of unpopular and unappealing species. We analyzed Polish people's interest in themed internet memes featuring the proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) and the consequences of this interest for conservation marketing. We examined Google Trends data, used Google Search, and searched popular media materials to estimate interest in the proboscis monkey in Poland. Photos of the proboscis monkey when presented with humor in internet memes attracted as much interest as usually more popular species (e.g., koala, panda, and orangutan) used in marketing by nongovernmental organizations. Amusing internet memes spread by social media positively correlated with increasing interest in the unappealing species, such as proboscis monkey. Interest in amusing internet memes positively correlated with individuals' decisions to donate to 6 crowdfunding actions. Thus, conservation marketing that includes amusing memes and social media may provide a worthwhile complement to traditional campaigns and are likely to influence individuals who are unaffected by the usual means.
© 2020 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Google Trends; Tendencias de Google; conservation marketing; conservation policy; especie amenazada; humor; internet memes; memes de internet; mercadotecnia de la conservación; mono násico; políticas de conservación; proboscis monkey; redes sociales; social media; threatened species; 保护政策; 保护营销; 幽默; 濒危物种; 社交媒体; 网络表情包; 谷歌趋势; 长鼻猴

Year:  2020        PMID: 32348597     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  5 in total

1.  What determines the success and failure of environmental crowdfunding?

Authors:  Takahiro Kubo; Diogo Veríssimo; Shinya Uryu; Taro Mieno; Douglas MacMillan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Safeguarding marine life: conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems.

Authors:  Delphi Ward; Jessica Melbourne-Thomas; Gretta T Pecl; Karen Evans; Madeline Green; Phillipa C McCormack; Camilla Novaglio; Rowan Trebilco; Narissa Bax; Madeleine J Brasier; Emma L Cavan; Graham Edgar; Heather L Hunt; Jan Jansen; Russ Jones; Mary-Anne Lea; Reuben Makomere; Chris Mull; Jayson M Semmens; Janette Shaw; Dugald Tinch; Tatiana J van Steveninck; Cayne Layton
Journal:  Rev Fish Biol Fish       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.845

3.  COVID-19 in Memes: The Adaptive Response of Societies to the Pandemic?

Authors:  Piotr Skórka; Beata Grzywacz; Dawid Moroń; Magdalena Lenda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  March Mammal Madness and the power of narrative in science outreach.

Authors:  Katie Hinde; Carlos Eduardo G Amorim; Alyson F Brokaw; Nicole Burt; Mary C Casillas; Albert Chen; Tara Chestnut; Patrice K Connors; Mauna Dasari; Connor Fox Ditelberg; Jeanne Dietrick; Josh Drew; Lara Durgavich; Brian Easterling; Charon Henning; Anne Hilborn; Elinor K Karlsson; Marc Kissel; Jennifer Kobylecky; Jason Krell; Danielle N Lee; Kate M Lesciotto; Kristi L Lewton; Jessica E Light; Jessica Martin; Asia Murphy; William Nickley; Alejandra Núñez-de la Mora; Olivia Pellicer; Valeria Pellicer; Anali Maughan Perry; Stephanie G Schuttler; Anne C Stone; Brian Tanis; Jesse Weber; Melissa Wilson; Emma Willcocks; Christopher N Anderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Climate Donations Inspired by Evidence-Based Fundraising.

Authors:  Benjamin S Freeling; Matthew J Dry; Sean D Connell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.