Literature DB >> 32347942

Letter: Surgical Management of Brain Tumor Patients in the COVID-19 Era.

Brad E Zacharia1,2, Daniel G Eichberg3, Michael E Ivan3,4, Simon Hanft5, John A Boockvar6, Huseyin Isildak7, Alireza Mansouri1,2, Ricardo J Komotar3,4, Randy S D'Amico6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32347942      PMCID: PMC7197540          DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: The “coronavirus disease 2019” or COVID-19, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Figure), has resulted in a worldwide pandemic and critically burdened healthcare systems. We aim at establishing guidelines regarding optimal surgical decision-making for treating brain tumor patients in the COVID-19 era.
FIGURE.

Illustration of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

Illustration of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

INTRACRANIAL TUMOR SURGICAL CASE STRATIFICATION

Decisions regarding surgical intervention in this resource-scarce time must undergo rigorous ethical and clinical evaluation. Except in emergency cases, we advocate using multidisciplinary conferences to gather consensus regarding surgical urgency.- Table 1 outlines our stratification used to guide surgical timing.
TABLE 1.

Surgical Timing Recommendations Based on Brain Tumor Surgical Indications

Category/procedureRecommendation
Emergent (performed as soon as possible)• Impending herniation, hydrocephalus• Assume patient is COVID-19 positive• Use enhanced PPEa
Urgent (performed as soon as possible, 2 to 7 d)• Suspicion for high-grade malignancy• Rapidly progressive neurological deficits• Stabilize patient medically• If COVID-19 testing available:– proceed with surgery– preoperative testing as close as possible to surgery– quarantine until testing returns negative– rapid testing the day of surgery if available• If testing unavailable:– assume patient is COVID-19 positive– use enhanced PPEa– only a minimum number of required staff permitted in the operating room
Semiurgent (performed within 1 to 4 wk)• Mild or asymptomatic brain lesions• Benign or stable imaging (absence of edema, mass effect, midline shift, etc)• Delay in surgery may cause progression of neurological deficit or disease• Stabilize patient medically• If testing not widely available:– preoperative testing as close as possible to surgery if the patient screens negative and has been self-quarantined for 14 d• If testing available:– proceed with surgery following preoperative testing as close as possible to surgery and quarantine until testing returns negative– rapid testing the day of surgery if available• Consider stereotactic radiosurgery as an alternative to open surgery and traditional fractionated radiotherapy in equivocal cases to preserve hospital resources and minimize risk of staff exposure

PPE, personal protective equipment; PAPR, powered air-purifying respirator.

Enhanced PPE defined as an N95 respirator with facial protection or PAPR, surgical bouffant/cap, gloves, and gown.

Surgical Timing Recommendations Based on Brain Tumor Surgical Indications PPE, personal protective equipment; PAPR, powered air-purifying respirator. Enhanced PPE defined as an N95 respirator with facial protection or PAPR, surgical bouffant/cap, gloves, and gown.

Screening/Testing Guidelines

In regions with high baseline COVID-19 rates and available testing, all patients should undergo testing as close as possible to surgery. Some institutions recommend 2 tests given the relatively high false-negative test rate. In regions where COVID-19 testing is not readily available, all patients should be screened with a questionnaire to assess the likelihood of active disease and prior exposure. Positive-screened patients should undergo testing when available or undergo 14-d preoperative quarantine. If testing remains unavailable, enhanced personal protective equipment (PPE) (Table 1) precautions should be considered. In institutions without routine testing availability and without high rates of disease presence, those patients who screen negative may likely proceed to the operating room with standard precautionary measures.

GENERAL PERIOPERATIVE CRANIAL PRECAUTIONS

Enhanced PPE should be utilized for these procedures in patients who screen positive via questionnaire or testing. Only essential staff should be permitted in the operating room. Aerosolization of the virus prior to and during intubation remains possible where it can deposit on fomites in the operating room, or even possibly remain suspended in the air., All staff nonessential to intubation should leave the room during intubation.

ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL PROCEDURES

Given the high viral load in the upper airway of infected patients, aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2 may be extremely high during sinonasal and upper airway procedures, particularly when powered instruments (such as drills) are employed. The American Association of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) recommends deferring endoscopic endonasal procedures unless emergent or until preoperative COVID-19 testing can be performed. Several scenarios, including high-flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, pituitary apoplexy, and progressive neurological deficits secondary to an enlarging sellar lesion, may be deemed emergent. Per the AAO-HNS, all surgeries should be performed using enhanced PPE, regardless of COVID-19 testing status. Strong consideration should be given to transcranial approaches to the sella when feasible (Table 2).
TABLE 2.

High-Risk COVID-19 Transmission Brain Tumor Surgical Approach Recommendations

Surgical approachRecommendations
Endoscopic endonasal• Consider transcranial approach if feasible
Awake craniotomy• Consider asleep mapping with intraoperative electromyogram mapping• Consider biopsy only if near speech areas (Broca/Wernicke)
Approaches requiring mastoid air cell drilling (ie, retrosigmoid craniotomy, posterior petrosectomy)• Enhanced PPE for all staff even if negative COVID-19 testing due to false-negative rate
Frontal craniotomies• Avoid entering paranasal sinuses
Benign tumors that are at high risk for prolonged hospital stay causing obstructive hydrocephalus• Consider CSF diversion with ETV or VPS and defer tumor resection
All high-risk surgical approaches• Defer surgery if elective• Enhanced PPE for all staff even if negative COVID-19 testing due to false-negative rate• Minimal staff in operating room at all times

CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ETV, endoscopic third ventriculostomy; PPE, personal protective equipment; VPS, ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

High-Risk COVID-19 Transmission Brain Tumor Surgical Approach Recommendations CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ETV, endoscopic third ventriculostomy; PPE, personal protective equipment; VPS, ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

PARANASAL SINUS INVOLVEMENT AND MASTOID DRILLING DURING TRANSCRANIAL SURGERY

Given that the paranasal sinuses are in direct communication with the upper airway, extreme caution should be exercised to avoid sinus entry during transcranial surgery. Previous publications have reported coronavirus (although not specifically SARS-CoV-2) involving the middle ear,; as mastoid drilling can aerosolize the virus, surgical approaches involving mastoid drilling should be either deferred if nonurgent or avoided in favor of safer approaches.

AWAKE CRANIOTOMIES

Although SARS-CoV-2 transmission during an awake craniotomy has never been reported, there is a theoretically high risk of viral transmission, as a laryngeal mask airway may be repeatedly inserted and removed throughout the surgery and virus particles may be transmitted while the patient is breathing and speaking. It may be prudent to use nonawake strategies for eloquent area mapping, such as asleep intraoperative electromyography. Biopsy rather than surgical resection with the speech mapping of left fronto-temporal-insular gliomas should be considered.

CONSUMPTION OF PPE AND HOSPITAL RESOURCES

Neurosurgeons should maintain extreme vigilance with PPE. For surgeries likely to result in prolonged hospitalization, surgical staging may be prudent. If a smaller surgical intervention is planned, the neurosurgeon should consider operating without an assistant. Reflexive intensive care unit (ICU) care for postoperative craniotomy patients can likely be avoided following most straightforward operations. Rapid discharges with close telemedicine follow-up should be employed. For patients with extensive preoperative neurological disability preventing early home discharge, social services should be activated upon hospital admission for swift rehab disposition. Expeditious but safe discharges can conserve hospital beds for COVID-19 patients.

PATIENT AND CAREGIVER SUPPORT

Brain tumor patients are particularly vulnerable in the COVID-19 era. Patients frequently suffer from neurological and functional impairment, thus requiring support via family, home nursing services, and physical, occupational, and speech therapy, many of which cannot be currently delivered. Preoperative consideration of these issues is paramount. Patients undergoing radiation and/or chemotherapy are frequently immunosuppressed and are at exquisite risk for the development of infection. As per National Cancer Institute recommendations, patients should practice respiratory precautions, limit exposure to others, and have access to several weeks of medications.

Disclosures

The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article. Dr Zacharia is a member of the NICO Corporation Speakers Bureau and is a consultant for Medtronic Incorporated.
  12 in total

1.  Identification of motor pathways during tumor surgery facilitated by multichannel electromyographic recording.

Authors:  C D Yingling; S Ojemann; B Dodson; M J Harrington; M S Berger
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Detection of rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and coronavirus infections in acute otitis media by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  A Pitkäranta; A Virolainen; J Jero; E Arruda; F G Hayden
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  COVID-19 and the Otolaryngologist: Preliminary Evidence-Based Review.

Authors:  Neelaysh Vukkadala; Z Jason Qian; F Christopher Holsinger; Zara M Patel; Eben Rosenthal
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Letter: Academic Neurosurgery Department Response to COVID-19 Pandemic: The University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital Model.

Authors:  Daniel G Eichberg; Ashish H Shah; Evan M Luther; Ingrid Menendez; Andrea Jimenez; Maggy Perez-Dickens; Kristine H O'Phelan; Michael E Ivan; Ricardo J Komotar; Allan D Levi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and coronavirus in otitis media with effusion.

Authors:  A Pitkäranta; J Jero; E Arruda; A Virolainen; F G Hayden
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetists.

Authors:  T M Cook; K El-Boghdadly; B McGuire; A F McNarry; A Patel; A Higgs
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Preliminary Recommendations for Surgical Practice of Neurosurgery Department in the Central Epidemic Area of 2019 Coronavirus Infection.

Authors:  Yu-Tang Tan; Jun-Wen Wang; Kai Zhao; Lin Han; Hua-Qiu Zhang; Hong-Quan Niu; Kai Shu; Ting Lei
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-26

8.  Letter to the editor by Dobran Mauro, Paracino Riccardo, and Iacoangeli Maurizio regarding "Neurosurgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: update from Lombardy, northern Italy." Zoia C, Bongetta D, Veiceschi P, Cenzato M, Di Meco F, Locatelli D, Boeris D, Fontanella MM. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04305-w.

Authors:  Mauro Dobran; Riccardo Paracino; Maurizio Iacoangeli
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Letter: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 Global Pandemic: A Neurosurgical Treatment Algorithm.

Authors:  John F Burke; Andrew K Chan; Valli Mummaneni; Dean Chou; Errol P Lobo; Mitchel S Berger; Philip V Theodosopoulos; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Combination of RT-qPCR testing and clinical features for diagnosis of COVID-19 facilitates management of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.

Authors:  Yishan Wang; Hanyujie Kang; Xuefeng Liu; Zhaohui Tong
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.327

View more
  10 in total

1.  Awake craniotomy for glioblastoma in COVID-19-positive patients and delivering the standard of care: illustrative case.

Authors:  Reinier Alvarez; Rupesh Kotecha; Michael W McDermott; Vitaly Siomin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2021-07-05

2.  Aerosolization in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Risk Mitigation in the COVID-19 Era: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Catherine F Roy; Emily Kay-Rivest; Lily H P Nguyen; Denis Sirhan; Marc A Tewfik
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-12-04

3.  Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review of the Literature for the COVID-19 Era and Beyond.

Authors:  Daniel G Eichberg; Gregory W Basil; Long Di; Ashish H Shah; Evan M Luther; Victor M Lu; Maggy Perez-Dickens; Ricardo J Komotar; Allan D Levi; Michael E Ivan
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  COVID-19 in cancer patients: risk, clinical features, and management.

Authors:  Cuiwei Liu; Yanxia Zhao; Derick Okwan-Duodu; Reva Basho; Xiaojiang Cui
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 4.248

5.  An Evaluation of Neurosurgical Practices During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

Authors:  Panayiotis E Pelargos; Arpan R Chakraborty; Owoicho Adogwa; Karin Swartz; Yan D Zhao; Zachary A Smith; Ian F Dunn; Andrew M Bauer
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 6.  Guidelines for Preoperative Testing for Neurosurgery in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Era: Indian Viewpoint Amidst Global Practice.

Authors:  Nitish Agarwal; Amol Raheja; Ashish Suri
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Surgical Management During the COVID-19 Era at a Private Tertiary Care Hospital of Karachi, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Nida Zahid; Erum Baig; Gulzar Lakhani; Hasnain Zafar; Asad Latif; Syed Ather Enam
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-07

Review 8.  How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted clinical care and research in Neuro-Oncology?

Authors:  Angus Airth; James R Whittle; James Dimou
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.116

9.  Impact of COVID-19 on public's interest in radiotherapy and other cancer treatments: a cross-sectional Google Trends analysis.

Authors:  Kaidi Wang; Anthony K Guzman; Gary D Lewis
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 10.  A Systematic Review on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Neurosurgical Practice and Indian Perspective.

Authors:  Saravanan Sadhasivam; Rajnish Kumar Arora; Rajasekhar Rekapalli; Jitender Chaturvedi; Nishant Goyal; Pranshu Bhargava; Radhey Shyam Mittal
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-02-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.