OBJECT: The goal of this study was to determine the usefulness of electromyographic (EMG) recording in locating motor pathways near the central sulcus or internal capsule during surgery. METHODS: Multichannel EMG recordings were compared with visual observation of contralateral body movement that was elicited by direct cortical or subcortical stimulation used to identify motor pathways before and during tumor resection. The EMG recordings were more sensitive than visual observation alone in identifying motor responses: in 30% of cases, responses were identified by EMG recording alone at some point during the operation and, in 9% of cases, EMG responses were the only responses observed. Additionally, EMG recordings often detected seizure activity resulting from electrical stimulation of the cortex that could not be appreciated on visual inspection. No new motor deficits were seen postoperatively in 88% of the patients in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Using EMG recording in addition to motor pathway mapping results in greater sensitivity, allowing the use of lower stimulation levels and facilitating detection of stimulation-induced seizure activity.
OBJECT: The goal of this study was to determine the usefulness of electromyographic (EMG) recording in locating motor pathways near the central sulcus or internal capsule during surgery. METHODS: Multichannel EMG recordings were compared with visual observation of contralateral body movement that was elicited by direct cortical or subcortical stimulation used to identify motor pathways before and during tumor resection. The EMG recordings were more sensitive than visual observation alone in identifying motor responses: in 30% of cases, responses were identified by EMG recording alone at some point during the operation and, in 9% of cases, EMG responses were the only responses observed. Additionally, EMG recordings often detected seizure activity resulting from electrical stimulation of the cortex that could not be appreciated on visual inspection. No new motor deficits were seen postoperatively in 88% of the patients in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Using EMG recording in addition to motor pathway mapping results in greater sensitivity, allowing the use of lower stimulation levels and facilitating detection of stimulation-induced seizure activity.
Authors: Giannantonio Spena; Elena Roca; Francesco Guerrini; Pier Paolo Panciani; Lorenzo Stanzani; Andrea Salmaggi; Sabino Luzzi; Marco Fontanella Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Roberto Cordella; Francesco Acerbi; Carlo Efisio Marras; Carla Carozzi; Davide Vailati; Marco Saini; Giovanni Tringali; Paolo Ferroli; Francesco Dimeco; Angelo Franzini; Giovanni Broggi Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: Wai Hoe Ng; Ayako Ochi; James T Rutka; Samuel Strantzas; Laura Holmes; Hiroshi Otsubo Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Francesco Signorelli; J Guyotat; C Mottolese; F Schneider; G D'Acunzi; J Isnard Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2004-05-07 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Elena Roca; Johan Pallud; Francesco Guerrini; Pier Paolo Panciani; Marco Fontanella; Giannantonio Spena Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 3.042