Literature DB >> 32347659

Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in raw meat intended for pet consumption.

Amanda Shapiro1, Katrina Bosward1, Karen Mathews1, Gemma Vincent2, John Stenos2, Mythili Tadepalli2, Jacqueline Norris1.   

Abstract

The discovery of antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in cattery-confined breeding cats indicating prior or current exposure (Shapiro et al., 2015) prompted an investigation into possible sources of infection. One hypothesis was that raw meat diets containing reservoir species may provide a source of C. burnetii transmission. The aim of this pilot study was to determine whether C. burnetii DNA was present in raw meat sold exclusively for companion animal consumption. The sample population consisted of raw meat packages (n = 58) of primarily kangaroo origin, with three to four aliquots (50-120 mg) randomly selected from each package. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole tissue in each of these aliquots using a modified protocol. Three quantitative PCR assays were used for the detection of C. burnetii targeting the IS1111 gene, the heat shock operon htpAB and the C. burnetii outer membrane protein-coding gene, com1. Coxiella burnetii DNA was detected in 25/58 samples (43%) using the IS1111, htpAB and/or com1 PCR assays and confirmed by DNA sequencing. All samples amplifying a product in the com1 assay also amplified a product in the htpAB and IS1111 assays. A total of 17/58 (29%) packets were positive with all three genes, 4/58 (7%) were positive with two genes (IS1111 and htpAB) and 4/58 (7%) were positive with the IS1111 gene only. Coxiella burnetii DNA was five times more likely to be found in offal than skeletal muscle meat samples. All meat samples in which C. burnetii DNA was found were from kangaroo tissues, while samples labelled as non-kangaroo meat (n = 4) were negative. Multi-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) identified three different genotypes of C. burnetii that have all been identified previously from Australian human clinical Q fever cases. Further investigations are required to determine the potential role of certain raw meats in the transmission of C. burnetii to cats and humans.
© 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Coxiella burnetiizzm321990; Q fever; cats and dogs; kangaroo; pet food; quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR); raw meat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32347659     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  3 in total

1.  Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods.

Authors:  Mark A Stevenson; Simon M Firestone; Anita Tolpinrud; John Stenos; Anne-Lise Chaber; Joanne M Devlin; Catherine Herbert; An Pas; Magdalena Dunowska
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 11.677

2.  The bacterial biome of ticks and their wildlife hosts at the urban-wildland interface.

Authors:  Siobhon L Egan; Casey L Taylor; Peter B Banks; Amy S Northover; Liisa A Ahlstrom; Una M Ryan; Peter J Irwin; Charlotte L Oskam
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2021-12

3.  Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii in pig-hunting dogs from north Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  B Orr; R Malik; M E Westman; J M Norris
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 1.343

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.