Metformin Improves the Depression Symptoms of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in a Lifestyle Modification Program.

BACKGROUND: Metformin is commonly prescribed to manage polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), which is one of the most common endocrine disorders among women of childbearing age and is associated with high prevalence rates of depression and anxiety.
OBJECTIVE: This study's objective was to determine the impact of prescribed metformin on depression and anxiety levels of patients with PCOS.
METHODS: This prospective, multi-center, cohort study examined the impact of prescribed metformin on the depression and anxiety of women with PCOS in four gynecology clinics in Saudi Arabia and Jordan. The women had recently been prescribed metformin along with lifestyle modifications, such as diet and exercise, and were compared to another group of women with PCOS who were prescribed lifestyle modifications only. Depression and anxiety were assessed at baseline and three months later using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale, respectively. Health-related quality of life was measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the impact of metformin on depression and anxiety.
RESULTS: Eighty-six women participated in the study: 53 were prescribed metformin with lifestyle modifications, and 33 were prescribed lifestyle modifications only. The women on metformin had 70% lower odds of having major depression (PHQ-9≥10) (OR=0.302, P=0.045); however, no significant effect of metformin on anxiety (GAD-7≥10) was found.
CONCLUSION: Metformin may have a role in the management of depression symptoms among patients with PCOS; however, its potential antidepressant effect should be further examined in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most commonly encountered reproductive, endocrine, and hormonal disorders among women of reproductive age.1,2 For a woman to be diagnosed with PCOS, she must have irregular or absent ovulation, high levels of androgenic hormones, and/or enlarged ovaries with 12 or more follicles in each ovary based on the Rotterdam consensus criteria.3 In addition, PCOS includes a multitude of hormonal and metabolic abnormalities, such as hyperinsulinemia, impaired fasting plasma glucose, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, acne, and abdominal obesity.2,4,5 These disorders increase the patient’s risk for developing diabetes, metabolic syndrome, endometrial hyperplasia, and endometrial cancer.4,6 Depending on the diagnostic criteria used,7,8 PCOS affects 6% to 18% of women worldwide in their reproductive years.2,9 In the Middle East, the prevalence of PCOS is equally high and ranges from 5% based on the National Institutes of Health criteria, to 19% based on the Rotterdam consensus criteria.10–13

Several studies have reported a link between PCOS and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL).14–16 Among the factors contributing to the impairment of HRQoL is the frequent presence of poor self-perception and psychiatric disorders, such as anxiety and depression among women with PCOS.17–20 It has been suggested that the prominent symptoms of the syndrome, such as obesity, infertility, acne, and hirsutism cause mental stress and might be responsible for the higher prevalence of psychiatric illnesses in this group of patients.4,21 The higher likelihood of psychiatric disorders among women with PCOS might also be due to the hyperinsulinemia, which occurs because of insulin resistance and obesity.22,23

Women with PCOS are treated based on their presenting signs/symptoms and their preferences. Lifestyle modifications, such as restricted caloric intake and regular exercise, are considered the first line of therapy for obese and overweight women with PCOS.24,25 Hormonal contraception is used to manage hirsutism and menstrual irregularities if pregnancy is not desired.24 In addition to hormonal contraception, metformin is used to manage insulin resistance.25 Metformin is also used to manage infertility and anovulation among women who desire to become pregnant either alone or in combination with clomiphene.25,26 The value of metformin in the management of PCOS stems from its insulin-sensitizing activity, improving insulin resistance, which is common among PCOS patients;27–29 lowering the insulin level is associated with a reduction in free testosterone and androstenedione.30 In addition, metformin reduces hepatic production of glucose,31 thereby decreasing the release of free fatty acids from the adipose tissue, and lowering the level of fasting free fatty acids.32 Metformin alone does not seem to reduce the body mass index (BMI) or weight of patients with PCOS;33 however, when it is combined with lifestyle interventions, such as a hypocaloric diet and exercise, it contributes to a weight-reducing effect.34

The results obtained in a small clinical trial that was conducted at a single medical center in China with a group of 54 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus raised the possibility that metformin may have an antidepressant effect.35 The results and conclusion were empirically supported by animal studies, and the downregulation of expression of the c-Jun gene in the hippocampus was proposed to mediate the antidepressant action of metformin.36,37 Metformin was also found to improve the psychosocial aspects of HRQoL among patients with PCOS after six months of treatment.38 However, not all of the results of these studies are in agreement. In a randomized controlled trial, the HRQoL scores of patients with PCOS receiving clomiphene plus metformin were significantly lower than the scores for those receiving clomiphene plus a placebo; this difference was attributable primarily to the higher incidence of gastrointestinal side effects among the patients on metformin.39 Another randomized controlled trial that examined the efficacy of two insulin sensitizers (metformin and pioglitazone) in depressed and obese patients with PCOS, indicated that pioglitazone resulted in a significantly better improvement in depression after six weeks of follow-up than metformin, although some improvement with metformin was also noted.33

Given the inconclusive results regarding the impact of metformin on depression in patients with PCOS, and evidence that ethnicity influences metabolic and hormonal aberrations associated with PCOS,40–42 the objective of the present study was to examine whether metformin has any antidepressant or anxiolytic effects among Middle Eastern women with PCOS. The impact of metformin on their HRQoL was also explored.

Methods

This prospective, multi-center, cohort study was conducted in four gynecology clinics in Riyadh, Buraydah, Medinah (Saudi Arabia), and Amman (Jordan). Patient recruitment started in January 2016 and ended in July 2018. Participants enrolled in the study were newly diagnosed with PCOS using the Rotterdam consensus criteria.3,43 All of the patients signed a written informed consent form in Arabic, which explained the purpose of the study and duration of enrollment. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of King Saud University College of Medicine, University of Jordan, Al Ansaar General Hospital, and Qassim University. This study adhered to the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration.44

The inclusion criteria were: the absence of diabetes, lack of a previous diagnosis of any mental disorder, including depression or anxiety, and the absence of any thyroid gland disorder, including hypothyroidism. Patients taking metformin (for PCOS or any other indication), who were treated with antidepressants, anti-anxiety agent, thyroxine, or any other medication for PCOS, such as clomiphene, letrozole, oral contraceptive, tamoxifen, or a herbal supplement, were excluded from the study. The recruited women were divided into two groups. The first group included patients who were prescribed metformin 850 mg twice a day plus lifestyle modifications, such as a calorie-restricted diet and regular exercise (eg, brisk walking for ≥ 30 minutes at least five days a week). The other group included women who were treated with lifestyle modifications only. Patients who were prescribed metformin were seen by physicians who usually started their patients with PCOS on metformin along with lifestyle modifications compared with the other group’s physicians who believed that PCOS should be managed first by lifestyle modifications only.

Information on patients’ age, BMI, educational level, other comorbidities, any menstrual cycle irregularities, and marital status were collected from the patients and from their medical records at baseline. All of the women were screened for depression, anxiety, and HRQoL at baseline and three months later, as the antidepressant effects of some medications can take up to three months before they are observed.45

The level of depression was evaluated using the Arabic version of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which consists of nine questions and is scored from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.46 The women’s anxiety was assessed using the Arabic version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale; this questionnaire yields scores from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating a more severe level of anxiety.47 Patients’ HRQoL was determined using the Arabic version of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which consists of eight scales (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health); each scale is scored from 0 to 100 with the higher scores indicating better HRQoL.48 The women were also screened for health literacy using the Arabic version of the single-item literacy screener (SILS). The SILS consists of a single question that assesses the patient’s need for someone to help him/her read and understand medical instructions and information contained in prescription medication leaflets, labels, and other educational medical materials. There are five possible responses (1-never, 2-rarely, 3-sometimes, 4-often, and 5-always), with a score of 3 or higher suggesting limited health literacy.49,50

Statistical Analysis

The minimum sample size, needed for a two-tailed t-test based on α=0.05, β=0.2, power=0.8, and a medium effect size (Cohen’s d=0.33) for the difference in the mean scores of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 at baseline and three months follow-up, was estimated to be 75 patients. To ensure patient confidentiality, all data were coded, and no patient identifiers were recorded. Student’s t-test, the chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test were performed as appropriate to compare the baseline data between the metformin group and the lifestyle modifications only group. Paired t-tests were used to compare the scores of both groups on the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and the eight scales of SF-36 at baseline and three months later.

Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine whether metformin had any antidepressant and/or anxiolytic effects. The dependent variables in all of the regression models were the PHQ-9 scores dichotomized into two categories (PHQ-9≥10 and PHQ-9<10) and the GAD-7 scores dichotomized into two categories (GAD-7 ≥10 and GAD-7<10) to examine the impact of metformin use on depression and anxiety, respectively. A PHQ-9 score ≥10 indicates major depression, and was found to have 88% sensitivity and specificity for major depression.51 On the other hand, a GAD-7 score of ≥10 indicates generalized anxiety disorder and was found to have 89% sensitivity and 82% specificity for generalized anxiety disorder.52 Eight logistic regression models were conducted to examine the impact of metformin use on depression and anxiety, controlling for the baseline PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores, respectively. In addition to the baseline PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores, Models II to VII controlled for age, other comorbidities, education, BMI, marital status, and health literacy, separately. In Model VIII, all of the aforementioned variables (age, other comorbidities, education, BMI, marital status, and health literacy) plus the baseline PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores were controlled for. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. All analyses were conducted using the SAS statistical software (version 9.2, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

During the period from March 2016 to June 2018, 128 women with a confirmed diagnosis of PCOS in the four participating clinics were approached. Of those, 102 women met the inclusion criteria. However, five women did not consent to participate, and 11 were lost to follow-up, resulting in a total enrollment of 86 women of which 53 were prescribed metformin and lifestyle modifications and 33 were managed using lifestyle modifications only. Women in both groups were advised to follow a lifestyle modification program, which included a hypocaloric diet and regular exercise.

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the recruited women are listed in Table 1. The mean age of both groups was not significantly different: 27.64 versus 28.90 years among the metformin and lifestyle modifications only groups, respectively. The overall mean BMI of both groups (28.58) was indicative of overweight. Almost all of the women completed at least high school, and more than one-third graduated from college. Accordingly, health literacy was very high (96.51%). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to educational level or health literacy (P≥0.05). Approximately half of the women were single and the other half were married. Irregular menstrual cycles were experienced by 56.6% of the women in the metformin group compared to 66.6% of their counterparts in the lifestyle modifications only group; however, this differences was not significant (P=0.353). Comorbidities were not frequent; single cases of hypertension, seizure, and asthma were present in both groups, and one case of dyslipidemia was encountered in the metformin group (Table 1).

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of the Study’s Cohort

Characteristics	Treatment Groups		P	Total (N = 86)
	Metformin and Lifestyle Modifications (n = 53)	Lifestyle Modifications Only (n = 33)
Age (years, mean ± SD)	27.64 ± 6.28	28.9± 7.01	0.386	28.13 ± 6.55
BMI (mean ± SD)	28.25 ± 5.75	29.12 ± 7.21	0.537	28.58 ± 6.33
Education
No formal education, n (%)	4 (7.55)	0 (0)	0.265	4 (4.65)
High school, n (%)	29 (54.72)	22 (66.67)		51 (59.30)
College, n (%)	20 (37.74)	11 (33.33)		31 (36.05)
Health Literacy
Limited, n (%)	3 (5.66)	0 (0)	0.282	3 (3.48)
Adequate, n (%)	50 (94.34)	33 (100.00)		83 (96.52)
Marital Status
Single, n (%)	24(45.28)	18(54.55)	0.403	42(48.84)
Married, n (%)	29(54.72)	15(45.45)		44(51.16)
Menstrual Cycle
Irregular, n (%)	30 (56.6%)	22 (66.6%)	0.353	52(60.47)
Regular, n (%)	23 (43.3%)	11 (33.3%)		34(39.53)
Comorbidities
None, n (%)	49 (92.45)	30 (90.91)	1.00	79 (91.86)
Hypertension, n (%)	1 (1.89)	1 (3.03)		2 (2.33)
Dyslipidemia, n (%)	1 (1.89)	0 (0)		1 (1.16)
Seizure, n (%)	1 (1.89)	1 (3.03)		2 (2.33)
Asthma, n (%)	1 (1.89)	1 (3.03)		2 (2.33)

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

The baseline as well as the 3-month follow-up scores of the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and eight scales of the SF-36 for both the metformin and lifestyle modifications only groups are shown in Table 2. The mean PHQ-9 score significantly decreased by 2.75 points following 3 months of metformin therapy, indicating improvement in the symptoms of depression (P=0.002). However, the small difference found in the mean PHQ-9 score among women in the lifestyle modifications only group (−0.702) did not reach statistical significance (P=0.378) (Table 2). This improvement in symptoms of depression among the women receiving metformin was reflected in the decreased number of women exhibiting major depression, defined as a PHQ-9 score ≥10. At baseline, 46.51% of the women had a PHQ-9 score ≥10, with no significant difference between the metformin and lifestyle modifications only groups (47.17% vs 45.45%; P=0.876). After three months of follow-up, the percentage of women with a PHQ-9 score ≥10 had decreased to 26.42% among those in the metformin group but remained unchanged (45.45%) among those in the lifestyle modifications only group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.069).

Table 2

Baseline and Follow-Up Scores for Patient-Reported Outcomes

Self-Reported Measure	Metformin and Lifestyle Modifications (n = 53)				Lifestyle Modifications Only (n = 33)
	Baseline	3-Month Follow-Up	Mean Difference§	P	Baseline	3-Month Follow-Up	Mean Difference§	P
PHQ-9	9.66 ± 6.34	6.92 ± 5.68	−2.75 ± 6.16	0.002*	9.79 ± 6.34	9.09 ± 5.53	−0.702 ± 4.52	0.378
GAD-7	7.58 ± 4.55	6.37 ± 4.66	−1.21 ± 5.32	0.104	9.55 ± 5.62	9.56 ± 5.06	0.0176 ± 6.13	0.987
SF-36
Physical functioning	86.61 ± 16.10	86.91 ± 18.57	0.297 ± 17.52	0.902	85.36 ± 18.24	85.07 ± 17.14	−0.296 ± 22.21	0.939
Role limitations due to physical health	80.52 ± 33.51	87.66 ± 18.15	7.14 ± 33.35	0.125	61.89 ± 43.74	90.05 ± 14.00	28.15 ± 37.73	<0.001*
Role limitations due to emotional problems	61.47 ± 44.99	83.27 ± 19.06	21.80 ± 48.15	0.002*	55.23 ± 47.56	76.70 ± 23.65	21.47 ± 49.44	0.018*
Energy/fatigue	47.56 ± 19.05	56.02 ± 16.84	8.46 ± 25.12	0.017*	45.99 ± 16.86	48.31 ± 18.51	2.31 ± 19.76	0.506
Emotional well-being	58.64 ± 17.09	68.21 ± 15.86	9.57 ± 19.7	<0.001*	54.32 ± 18.35	54.58 ± 17.93	0.259 ± 22.36	0.947
Social functioning	85.21 ±  21.45	85.14 ± 21.29	−0.063 ± 26.98	0.986	76.05 ± 23.58	80.84 ± 22.54	4.78 ± 23.14	0.243
Pain	79.37 ± 23.31	83.21 ± 22.14	3.83 ± 21.48	0.200	66.44 ± 31.56	77.79 ± 26.18	11.36 ± 42.63	0.136
General health	70.29 ± 18.64	74.31 ± 20.92	4.01 ± 22.67	0.202	64.04 ± 14.03	73.79 ± 17.87	9.75 ± 17.86	0.004*

Notes: Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05. §Improvement is indicated by a negative mean difference in the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores, and a positive mean difference in the SF-36 scores.

Abbreviations: PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; GAD-7, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Survey.

The mean GAD-7 scores did not change significantly from baseline to three months later among the women in the metformin and lifestyle modifications only groups (Table 2). Similarly, no significant difference was found in the percentage of women with a GAD-7 score ≥10, indicating the presence of generalized anxiety disorder at baseline. However, the difference was significant after three months of follow-up, shifting downward from 30.19% to 26.42% among the women in the metformin group, and upward from 42.42% to 48.48% among the women in the lifestyle modifications only group (P=0.036).

Scores on the eight scales of the SF-36 at baseline and three months later are presented in Table 2. Both groups’ scores on role limitations due to emotional problems improved after three months of follow-up. Furthermore, the women who received metformin felt more energetic/less fatigued, and experienced improved emotional well-being. The women who were treated only with lifestyle modifications reported fewer role limitations due to physical health and better general health. Self-reported physical functioning, social functioning, and level of pain were not affected by either type of treatment.

Women on metformin had 3.3 times lower odds of having major depression (PHQ-9 score ≥10) compared to those in the lifestyle modifications only group, controlling for the PHQ-9 score at baseline, age, educational level, health literacy, marital status, BMI, and the number of comorbidities (OR=0.302; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.093–0.976; P=0.045). This significant relationship remained significant in all of the regression models, except the model that controlled for marital status and the baseline PHQ-9 score (Table 3). On the other hand, the odds of having a GAD-7 score ≥10, which indicates generalized anxiety disorder, was 2.91 times lower among women in the metformin group than their counterparts in the lifestyle modifications only group, but the difference was not statistically significant in most of the regression models that controlled for the GAD-7 score at baseline as well as age, educational level, health literacy, marital status, BMI, and the number of comorbidities (OR=0.344; 95% CI, 0.117–1.011; P=0.052) (Table 4).

Table 3

Logistic Regression Analyses for the Association Between Treatment with Metformin and Scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Items (PHQ-9)

Variable	Odds Ratio	P-value	95% Confidence Interval
			Lower	Upper
Model I, adjusted for the baseline PHQ-9 score
Metformin Use	0.309	0.036*	0.103	0.931
Model II, adjusted for the baseline PHQ-9 score and age
Metformin Use	0.291	0.031*	0.095	0.893
Model III, adjusted for the baseline PHQ-9 score and other comorbidities
Metformin Use	0.308	0.031*	0.102	0.928
Model IV, adjusted for the baseline PHQ-9 score and education
Metformin Use	0.303	0.038*	0.098	0.906
Model V, adjusted for the baseline PHQ-9 score and BMI
Metformin Use	0.303	0.034*	0.100	0.918
Model VI, adjusted for the baseline PHQ-9 score and marital status
Metformin Use	0.334	0.055	0.109	1.023
Model VII, adjusted for the baseline PHQ-9 score and health literacy
Metformin Use	0.310	0.039	0.102	0.946
Model VIII, adjusted for the baseline PHQ-9 score, age, number of comorbidities, education, health literacy, marital status, and BMI
Metformin Use	0.302	0.045*	0.093	0.976

Note: *P<0.05.

Table 4

Multiple Logistic Regression Analyses for the Association Between Treatment with Metformin and Scores on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Scale

Variable	Odds Ratio	P-value	95% Confidence Interval
			Lower	Upper
Model I, adjusted for the baseline GAD-7score
Metformin Use	0.413	0.068	0.160	1.069
Model II, adjusted for the baseline GAD-7score and age
Metformin Use	0.446	0.106	0.168	1.189
Model III, adjusted for the baseline GAD-7score and other comorbidities
Metformin Use	0.413	0.068	0.159	1069
Model IV, adjusted for the baseline GAD-7 score and education
Metformin Use	0.385	0.055	0.145	1.021
Model V, adjusted for the baseline GAD-7 score and BMI
Metformin Use	0.434	0.094	0.163	1.153
Model VI, adjusted for the baseline GAD-7 score and marital status
Metformin Use	0.388	0.054	0.148	1.020
Model VII, adjusted for the baseline GAD-7 score and health literacy
Metformin Use	0.361	0.041*	0.136	0.961
Model VIII, adjusted for the baseline GAD-7 score, age, other comorbidities, education, health literacy, marital status, and BMI
Metformin Use	0.344	0.052	0.117	1.011

Note: *P<0.05.

Discussion

The findings of this study suggest that metformin might have mental-health benefits for women affected by PCOS. This conclusion was drawn from the results of two types of analyses. First, the mean score on the PHQ-9 scale, which was used to screen patients for depression, decreased by 2.75 points at the 3-month follow-up in the patients treated with metformin and lifestyle modifications, while no significant change was observed in the women treated with lifestyle modifications only. Furthermore, the women who received metformin had lower odds of having major depression, as indicated by a PHQ-9 score ≥10, even after controlling for the baseline PHQ-9 score, age, educational level, health literacy, BMI, and the number of comorbidities. However, metformin combined with lifestyle modifications failed to show a significant reduction in the mean GAD-7 score, even after controlling for the baseline GAD-7 score, age, educational level, health literacy, BMI, and the number of comorbidities. With regard to the patients’ HRQoL, the mean score on the SF-36 scale measuring role limitations due to emotional problems improved among the women in both treatment groups after three months of follow-up. However, the mean scores on the energy/fatigue and emotional well-being scales showed significant improvement after three months of follow-up only among the patients in the metformin with lifestyle modifications group. Of note, the scores on the perception of general health and role limitations due to physical health did not improve among the women treated with metformin; better scores at follow-up were achieved by the women in the lifestyle modifications only group.

Several studies have documented a beneficial impact of metformin on diabetes-related depression clinically,33,35,53 and experimentally,36,54 although in some cases, the antidepressant effect was not reported.27,55 Metformin has also demonstrated an anti-anxiety effect among patients with diabetes56 as well as in animal models.57 Despite these encouraging results, few studies have investigated the antidepressant or anxiolytic effects of metformin among patients with PCOS.33,38,39,58,59 These studies have reported conflicting results confirming33,38,58 and refuting39,59 the positive effect of metformin in the management of depression in this patient population. The present work suggests that metformin with lifestyle modifications has a positive impact on depression, but not on anxiety among women with PCOS. Interestingly, it is noteworthy that the latter finding is in agreement with the only study conducted thus far on the effect of metformin on the anxiety of women with PCOS. In this study, stress associated with public speaking was used as the measure of anxiety.59

The reasons for the discrepancies in the results of the published studies are difficult to explain. However, in addition to differences in study design and the small number of women examined, the ethnicity and genetics of the participants might have played a significant role as confounding factors.60–62 Genome-wide association studies have highlighted the need to include a large sample size and patients representing multiple ethnic groups in the context of diabetes treatment.63 Similarly, differences in the metabolic manifestations associated with PCOS are present among patients from various geographical regions.41 Middle Eastern women are more likely to be diagnosed with PCOS at a younger age and have a higher rate of insulin resistance compared to their Caucasian counterparts with PCOS.64 Hirsutism is more frequent in patients with PCOS from the Middle East than in those of European ancestry.65 African American and Hispanic women have significantly higher BMIs and waist circumferences compared with their Northern European and Asian counterparts.66 Thus, it is very likely that the discrepancies among the previous studies addressing the therapeutic impact of metformin on PCOS-related depression are also related to population genetics. This possibility highlights the necessity to obtain data pertaining to different ethnicities. The present study addresses this imperative by providing relevant data for a cohort of Middle Eastern women, which have previously been unavailable.

To understand fully, the effect of metformin on depression in PCOS and the basis for ethnic differences, its mechanism of action must be explained. Although it is most often assumed that metformin counteracts depression in women with diabetes and PCOS by alleviating the multiple sequelae of the underlying disease, alternative mechanisms have been recently proposed. Experimentally, metformin has been shown to act as an antidepressant by regulating DNA hydroxymethylation via the AMPK/Tet2 pathway, resulting in upregulation of a neuroprotective peptide, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).67 Metformin can also activate the formation of BDNF by activating CREB and Akt/GSK3 signaling pathways.68 In addition, research into the insulin resistance-independent modes of action of metformin on the brain may provide additional insights into the clinical application of this drug. The need for novel information is critical because at present there is a perceivable paucity of data on pharmacological treatment options for the management of depression and anxiety among patients with PCOS.18

Limitations

In comparison with previously published research, the current investigation has the advantage of being conducted in four clinical centers and being designed as a prospective study, providing additional strength to the conclusions reached.69 Moreover, the effects of metformin on multiple variables – depression, anxiety, and HRQoL – were analyzed. However, some limitations have to be acknowledged. The sample size, although it satisfied the pre-established level of statistical power, was relatively small. One of the reasons for not being able to recruit more participants was the difficulty of recruiting women with PCOS, given the cultural barriers in the Middle East. It should be recognized, however, that the sample size was comparable to those employed in similar studies.58,59 Despite the effort to recruit the same number of patients for both study groups, the number of patients in the metformin with lifestyle modifications group was significantly higher than the number in the lifestyle modifications only group. However, the study was an observational one, and the number of patients in each arm of treatment could not be controlled, as no randomization was performed and the investigators did not have any influence over the number of patients in either treatment group. In addition, depression and anxiety were assessed using the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales, which are widely used in assessments of levels of depression and anxiety with high levels of specificity and sensitivity,51,52 however, they are used in the assessment and screening for depression and anxiety, respectively, and not for diagnostic purposes. Moreover, the impact of metformin on body weight over the three months of follow-up was not assessed; this is something that could have a role in explaining the difference between the PHQ-9 scores at baseline and follow-up. Finally, adherence to medication and the required lifestyle modifications were not addressed in this study. Therefore, a causal effect of the use of metformin combined with lifestyle modifications on the improvement of symptoms of depression among patients with PCOS cannot be established.

Conclusion

Despite the shortcomings of this study, the collected data suggest that metformin treatment combined with lifestyle modifications improves the mental well-being of patients with PCOS. The current findings support the notion that all women with PCOS should undergo psychological screening and receive appropriate interventions whenever required. Finally, future studies should verify the findings of this study using more robust study designs, such as randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials.