Literature DB >> 32346038

Genetic factors associated with response to as-needed aflibercept therapy for typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Seigo Yoneyama1, Yoichi Sakurada2, Wataru Kikushima1, Atsushi Sugiyama1, Mio Matsubara1, Yoshiko Fukuda1, Naohiko Tanabe1, Ravi Parikh3,4, Fumihiko Mabuchi1, Kenji Kashiwagi1, Hiroyuki Iijima1.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the association between susceptible genetic variants to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and response to as-needed intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) therapy for exudative AMD including both typical neovascular AMD and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) over 12-months. A total of 234 patients with exudative AMD were initially treated with 3 monthly IAI and thereafter as-needed IAI over 12 months. Seven variants of 6 genes including ARMS2 A69S (rs10490924), CFH (I62V:rs800292 and rs1329428), C2-CFB-SKIV2L(rs429608), C3 (rs2241394), CETP (rs3764261) and ADAMTS-9 (rs6795735) were genotyped for all participants using TaqMan technology. After adjusting for age, gender, baseline BCVA and AMD subtype, A (protective) allele of C2-CFB-SKIV2L rs429608 was associated with visual improvement at 12-month (P = 0.003). Retreatment was associated with T(risk) allele of ARMS2 A69S (P = 2.0 × 10-4; hazard ratio: 2.18:95%CI: 1.47-3.24) and C(risk) allele of CFH rs1329428 (P = 2.0 × 10-3; hazard ratio: 1.74:95%CI: 1.16-2.59) after adjusting for the baseline confounders. The need for additional injections was also associated with T allele of ARMS2 A69S (P = 1.0 × 10-5) and C allele of CFH rs1329428 (P = 3.0 × 10-3) after adjusting for the baseline confounders. The variants of ARMS2 and CFH are informative for both physicians and patients to predict recurrence and to quantify the need for additional injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32346038      PMCID: PMC7189239          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64301-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of blindness in the industrialized countries of Asia[1], is subdivided into choroidal neovascularization secondary to exudative AMD or geographic atrophy (GA). A recent clinic-based study reported that exudative AMD accounts for almost 95% of advanced AMD in the Japanese[2]. It has been reported that more than 20 genetic variants are associated with AMD through genome-wide association studies[3-5]. Of the genetic variants which make one more susceptible to AMD, variants in ARMS2 and CFH genes have been reported to be strongly associated with AMD, followed by variants in C2-CFB-SKIV2L and C3 genes[3]. To date, intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have been first-line therapy for exudative AMD worldwide. VIEW1/2 study demonstrated that three monthly intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) followed by bimonthly IAI was effective for treating exudative AMD and was non-inferior to monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injection regarding best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)[6]. Pro re nata (PRN) regimen is also referred to as-needed regimen, and several prospective studies have demonstrated that PRN regimen is almost equivalent as monthly dosing regimen in terms of visual improvement[7,8]. PRN may also be a more practical treatment strategy due to the burdens of treatment cost and frequent clinic visits. In a recent genome-wide association study investigating the response to ranibizumab for exudative AMD among Japanese patients using a PRN regimen, no specific gene variants were associated with a significant improvement of visual acuity at 12 months. However, the ARMS2 A69S variant was associated with need for retreatment[9]. To date, there have been no reports investigating differences in response to aflibercept for exudative AMD among genotypic variants. In the present study, we investigated the genetic associations of response to as-needed IAI with visual outcomes and the need for additional injections after initial 3 monthly IAI and followed by as-needed IAI for exudative AMD during 12-month follow-up.

Results

Table 1 shows baseline demographic and genetic characteristics of 234 patients composed of 118 patients with typical neovascular AMD and 116 patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Compared with patients with PCV, patients with typical neovascular AMD were older (p = 3.5 × 10−6) and had higher T allele frequency of ARMS2 A69S (p = 3.5 × 10−3). The fellow eye condition was no drusen (n = 96), pachydrusen (n = 20), soft drusen (n = 49), pseudodrusen(n = 32), and exudative AMD/scarring(n = 37).
Table 1

Demographic and genetic characteristics in patients with exudative ag-related macular degeneration.

All patients (n = 234)Typical neovascular AMD (n = 118)PCV (n = 116)P value
Age74.9 ± 8.277.5 ± 8.072.2 ± 7.73.5 × 10−6
Male gender170 (72.7%)80 (67.8%)90 (77.6%)0.093
Need for retreatment157 (67.1%)81 (68.6%)76 (65.5%)0.31
Baseline BCVA (log MAR)0.42 ± 0.370.51 ± 0.380.33 ± 0.334.0 × 10−4
ARMS2 A69S (rs10490924)
TT100(42.7%)60(50.9%)40(34.5%)
TG95(40.6%)44(37.2%)51(44.0%)
GG39(16.7%)14(11.9%)25(21.5%)
T allele frequency63.0%69.5%56.5%3.5 × 10−3
CFH I62V (rs800292)
GG134(57.3%)71(60.2%)63(54.3%)
GA88(37.6%)42(35.6%)46(39.7%)
AA12(5.1%)5(4.2%)7(6.0%)
G allele frequency76.1%78.0%74.1%0.016
CFH (rs1329428)
CC101(43.2%)52(44.1%)49(42.2%)
CT108(46.2%)59(50.0%)49(42.2%)
TT25(10.6%)7(5.9%)18(15.6%)
C allele frequency66.2%69.1%63.4%0.19
C2-CFB-SKIV2L (rs429608)
AA2(0.9%)02(1.7%)
AG33(14.1%)13 (11.0%)20(17.2%)
GG199(85.0%)105(89.0%)94(81.1%)
A allele frequency7.9%5.5%10.3%0.053
C3 (rs2241394)
GG1(0.4%)01(0.9%)
GC27(11.5%)14(11.9%)13(11.2%)
CC206(88.0%)104(88.1%)102(87.9%)
G allele frequency6.2%5.9%6.5%0.81
CETP (rs3764261)
TT10(4.3%)5(4.2%)5(4.3%)
TG70(29.9%)33(28.0%)37(31.9%)
GG154(65.8%)80(67.6%)74(63.8%)
T allele frequency19.2%18.2%20.3%0.58
ADAMTS9 (rs6795735)
CC4(1.7%)1(0.8%)3(2.6%)
CT55(23.5%)29(24.6%)26(22.4%)
TT175(74.8%)88(74.6%)87(75.0%)
C allele frequency13.5%13.1%13.8%0.84
Demographic and genetic characteristics in patients with exudative ag-related macular degeneration. Table 2 shows the demographic and genetic characteristics of patients with or without requiring retreatment. Of 234 patients, 157(67.1%) required the additional injection. Compared with patients without requiring the retreatment, patients requiring the retreatment were significantly older(p = 5.2 × 10−4) and had higher risk allele frequency of ARMS2 A69S and CFH rs1329428(p = 2.0 × 10−4 and 2.0 × 10−3, respectively). Table 3 show number of additional intravitreal aflibercept injection according to genotypes in 7 variants of 6 genes. Number of additional injections was significantly different among ARMS2 A69S and CFH rs1329428 (p = 1.2 × 10−5 and 4.0 × 10−3, respectively). Number of additional injections was significantly associated with risk allele of ARMS2 A69S (risk allele: T allele) and CFH rs1329428 (risk allele: C allele) (p = 1.0 × 10−5 and 3.0 × 10−3, respectively). Figure 1 shows Kaplan-Meier estimator demonstrating retreatment-free period from the initial injection according to ARMS2 A69S genotypes and CFH rs1329428 genotypes. A statistically significant difference was seen in retreatment-free period among ARMS2 A69S genotypes (P = 6.0 × 10−4, log-rank test).
Table 2

Comparison of genetic characteristics between patients with or without retreatment.

With retreatment (n = 157)Without retreatment (n = 77)Univariate p-valueMultivariate p-valueOdds ratio (95%CI)
Age76.2 ± 7.872.1 ± 8.53.5 × 10−65.2 × 10−4(※)1.06 (1.03–1.10)
Male gender113(72.0%)57(74.0%)0.74NANA
AMD subtype (neovascular AMD)81(51.6%)37(48.1%)0.61NANA
ARMS2 A69S (rs10490924)
TT77(49.0%)23(29.9%)
TG63(40.1%)32(41.6%)
GG17(10.9%)22(28.5%)
T allele frequency69.1%50.6%1.0 × 10−42.0 × 10−4(※※)2.18 (1.47–3.24)
CFH I62V (rs800292)
GG96(61.1%)38(49.4%)
GA55(35.0%)33(42.9%)
AA6(3.8%)6(7.3%)
G allele frequency78.7%71.2%0.060NANA
CFH (rs1329428)
CC75(47.8%)26(33.7%)
CT71(45.2%)37(48.1%)
TT11(7.0%)14(18.2%)
C allele frequency71.3%57.6%6.8 × 10−32.0 × 10−3(※※)1.74 (1.16–2.59)
C2-CFB-SKIV2L (rs429608)
AA1(0.6%)1(1.3%)
AG21(13.4%)12(15.6%)
GG135(86.0%)64(83.1%)
A allele frequency7.5%7.6%0.51NANA
C3 (rs2241394)
GG01(1.3%)
GC16(10.2%)11(14.3%)
CC141(89.8%)65(84.4%)
G allele frequency4.5%7.6%0.16NANA
CETP (rs3764261)
TT8(5.1%)2(2.6%)
TG46(29.3%)24(31.2%)
GG103(65.6%)51(66.2%)
T allele frequency18.7%20.5%0.69NANA
ADAMTS9 (rs6795735)
CC04(5.2%)
CT39(24.8%)16(20.8%)
TT118(75.2%)57(74.0%)
C allele frequency10.8%15.9%0.35NANA

(※)adjusting for gender, baseline BCVA, AMD subtype.

(※※) adjusting for age, gender, baseline BCVA, AMD subtype.

Table 3

Number of additional injections according to genotypes during 12-month.

Number of additional treatmentsP valueAdjusted p value
ARMS2 A69S (rs10490924)TT2.66 ± 2.31
TG1.84 ± 1.85
GG1.05 ± 1.431.2 × 10−51.0 × 10−5(※)
CFH I62V (rs800292)GG2.31 ± 2.20
GA1.78 ± 1.91
AA1.33 ± 1.500.027NA
CFH (rs1329428)CC2.45 ± 2.24
CT1.89 ± 1.96
TT1.24 ± 1.564.0 × 10−33.0 × 10−3(※)
C2-CFB-SKIV2L (rs429608)AA1.50 ± 2.12
AG1.85 ± 1.95
GG2.10 ± 2.100.46NA
C3 (rs2241394)GG0
GC1.52 ± 1.93
CC2.14 ± 2.090.085NA
CETP (rs3764261)TT2.70 ± 1.57
TG1.81 ± 1.88
GG2.13 ± 2.190.81NA
ADAMTS9 (rs6795735)CC0
CT2.58 ± 2.48
TT1.94 ± 1.920.43NA

(※) adjusting for age, gender, baseline BCVA, AMD subtype.

Figure 1

Retreatment free period from the initial injection according to ARMS2 A69S and CFH rs1329428 genotypes. (A) Retreatment free period from the initial injection according to ARMS2 A69S genotypes. Mean retreatment-free period after the initial injection was 9.0 ± 3.5 (95%CI:7.9–10.1), 7.6 ± 3.5 (95%CI:6.9–8.3), 6.5 ± 3.3 (95%CI:5.9–7.2) in GG genotype, TG genotype, TT genotype, respectively. There was a significant difference in retreatment-free period among ARMS2 A69S genotypes (p = 6.0 × 10−4, log-rank test). (B) Retreatment free period from the initial injection according to CFH rs1329428 genotypes. Mean retreatment-free period after the initial injection was 8.8 ± 3.8 (95%CI:7.3–10.3), 7.5 ± 3.6 (95%CI:6.8–8.2), 6.9 ± 3.4 (95%CI:6.2–7.5) in TT genotype, CT genotype, CC genotype, respectively. There was a marginal significant difference in retreatment-free period among CFH rs1329428 genotypes (p = 0.0327, log-rank test).

Comparison of genetic characteristics between patients with or without retreatment. (※)adjusting for gender, baseline BCVA, AMD subtype. (※※) adjusting for age, gender, baseline BCVA, AMD subtype. Number of additional injections according to genotypes during 12-month. (※) adjusting for age, gender, baseline BCVA, AMD subtype. Retreatment free period from the initial injection according to ARMS2 A69S and CFH rs1329428 genotypes. (A) Retreatment free period from the initial injection according to ARMS2 A69S genotypes. Mean retreatment-free period after the initial injection was 9.0 ± 3.5 (95%CI:7.9–10.1), 7.6 ± 3.5 (95%CI:6.9–8.3), 6.5 ± 3.3 (95%CI:5.9–7.2) in GG genotype, TG genotype, TT genotype, respectively. There was a significant difference in retreatment-free period among ARMS2 A69S genotypes (p = 6.0 × 10−4, log-rank test). (B) Retreatment free period from the initial injection according to CFH rs1329428 genotypes. Mean retreatment-free period after the initial injection was 8.8 ± 3.8 (95%CI:7.3–10.3), 7.5 ± 3.6 (95%CI:6.8–8.2), 6.9 ± 3.4 (95%CI:6.2–7.5) in TT genotype, CT genotype, CC genotype, respectively. There was a marginal significant difference in retreatment-free period among CFH rs1329428 genotypes (p = 0.0327, log-rank test). Table 4 shows baseline BCVA and BCVA improvement according to genotypes in 7 variants of 6 genes. Although there was not a significant difference in baseline BCVA among genotypes in the 7 variants, A allele in rs429608 of C2-CFB-SKIV2L was significantly associated with BCVA improvement at 12-month.
Table 4

Visual improvement according to genotypes at 12-month.

Baseline BCVAP valueBCVA improvement at 12monthP valueAdjusted p value
ARMS2 A69S (rs10490924)TT0.42 ± 0.37−0.12 ± 0.28
TG0.49 ± 0.40−0.20 ± 0.33
GG0.30 ± 0.240.48−0.14 ± 0.200.34NA
CFH I62V (rs800292)GG0.41 ± 0.37−0.15 ± 0.26
GA0.43 ± 0.41−0.16 ± 0.32
AA0.54 ± 0.450.33−0.25 ± 0.430.39NA
CFH (rs1329428)CC0.42 ± 0.37−0.17 ± 0.27
CT0.43 ± 0.38−0.15 ± 0.30
TT0.40 ± 0.450.93−0.14 ± 0.330.48NA
C2-CFB-SKIV2L (rs429608)AA0.70 ± 0.42−0.50 ± 0.14
AG0.49 ± 0.44−0.30 ± 0.37
GG0.41 ± 0.360.12−0.13 ± 0.271.0 × 10−33.0 × 10−3(※)
C3 (rs2241394)GG0.7−0.18
GC0.52 ± 0.39−0.18 ± 0.29
CC0.41 ± 0.370.11−0.15 ± 0.290.70NA
CETP (rs3764261)TT0.27 ± 0.09−0.04 ± 0.40
TG0.39 ± 0.34−0.18 ± 0.23
GG0.45 ± 0.390.081−0.16 ± 0.300.42NA
ADAMTS9 (rs6795735)CC0.33 ± 0.30−0.14 ± 0.28
CT0.35 ± 0.28−0.09 ± 0.26
TT0.45 ± 0.390.083−0.18 ± 0.300.057NA

(※)adjusting for age, gender, baseline BCVA, and AMD subtype.

Visual improvement according to genotypes at 12-month. (※)adjusting for age, gender, baseline BCVA, and AMD subtype.

Discussion

To date, anti-VEGF therapy is a first-line treatment for exudative AMD worldwide; however, for each eye there may be a wide range of clinical responses as well as number of injections needed. In some patients, BCVA greatly improved without additional injections, while in other patients, BCVA deteriorated in spite of monthly injection over 12-months. Given that several genetic factors are associated with clinical phenotype in exudative AMD[10-13], it would be reasonable to consider that differences in response to the treatment might contribute to genetic factors. Our study has found some genetic basis in the variable response as well as treatment burden among Japanese patients with macular neovascularization from typical neovascular AMD and PCV. We found that the A (protective) allele of SKIV2L rs429608 was associated with visual improvement at 12-months. Further, we found that the need for retreatment was associated with T(risk) allele of ARMS2 A69S and the C(risk) allele of CFH rs1329428 after adjusting for the baseline confounders. There have been several reports investigating the association between genetic variants and response to ranibizumab or bevacizumab for exudative AMD. In CATT study, none of the investigated variants (CFH, ARMS2/HTRA1, C3) were associated with clinical outcomes including visual outcomes, OCT parameters, number of additional injections[14]. A recent Japanese prospective study using ranibizumab PRN regimen demonstrated that risk allele of ARMS2 A69S was associated with retreatment[9]. Several retrospective studies using ranibizumab also reported that risk allele of ARMS2 was associated with retreatment or number of additional injections[15,16]. In the present study using aflibercept, our results were consistent with previous reports, but our study is the first to investigate the effect of aflibercept response among the aforementioned genetic variants. In addition to ARMS2 A69S, risk (C) allele of CFH rs1329428 was associated with retreatment and number of additional injections. C allele of CFH rs1329428 is a susceptible variant to AMD; on the other hand, it has been reported that T allele of CFH rs1329428 is known as a genetic susceptible variant to central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC)[17-19] and with choroidal vascular hyperpermeability (CVH) and subfoveal choroidal thickness in eyes with PCV[20]. G allele of CFH I62V is a responsible variants in the CFH region for exudative AMD in the Japanese population; however, interestingly, response to aflibercept therapy in terms of retreatment was associated with C allele of CFH rs1329428 rather than G allele of CFH I62V. Pharmacogenetic genetic association was seen in terms of retreatment and number of additional IAI. Therefore, genotyping variants of ARMS2 A69S and CFH rs1329428 would be informative for both patients and physicians to predict additional injections and number of additional injections. This would be important for patient education, informing follow up, and bring AMD care towards a more personalized approach to optimize visual outcomes. Regarding the association between visual improvement and genetic variants, several studies demonstrated that none of variants were associated with visual improvement[9,14] and other studies have shown the positive association between ARMS2/HTRA variants and visual improvement[21,22]. In the present study, there was a statistically significant association between C2-CFB-SKIV2L rs429608 genotypes and visual improvement. There was a wide range in baseline BCVA among rs429608 genotypes although it did not reach a statistically significance. Further studies would be needed to confirm or refute the present results. Limitations of the current study include its retrospective nature of analysis and sample size and lack of information regarding symptoms prior to the initial presentation although the current sample is larger than prior retrospective genotype-clinical outcome studies in AMD. In the present study, we genotyped major risk allele in 7 variants of 6 genes; however, we cannot exclude the possibility that other susceptible variants to AMD are associated with aflibercept treatment response. A large-scale prospective genome-wide association study using aflibercept would be needed to confirm our tentative conclusion. In summary, the A allele of C2-CFB-SKIV2L rs429608 was associated with visual improvement while the T allele of ARMS2 A69S and C allele of CFH rs1329428 were associated with the need for retreatment and a greater number of additional injections during the first 12 months of PRN aflibercept therapy among treatment naïve exudative AMD of Japanese descent.

Methods

Subjects

We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 234 eyes (from 234 patients) with treatment naïve exudative AMD receiving 3 monthly intravitreal aflibercept (0.05 ml/2 mg) injections at the University of Yamanashi Hospital between 2013 January and 2018 September and completed 12-months of follow-up. We included the patients with exudative AMD including PCV and typical neovascular AMD. Eyes with typical neovascular AMD show type 1 or type 2 NV on SD-OCT and absence of polypoidal lesion on ICGA. This study was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Yamanashi and adhered to the tenets of Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before treatment.

Treatment and follow-up

Prior to the treatment, all patients had undergone comprehensive ophthalmic examinations including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement using Landolt C chart, intraocular pressure measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy with 78 diopter contact lens, fundus color photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography(OCT) using Spectralis version 5.4 HRA + OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany) and fluorescein angiography(FA) and indocyanine green angiography(ICGA) using a confocal laser scanning system (HRA-2;Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany).The fellow eye condition was classified into 5 groups;1) no drusen,2) pachydrusen,3)soft drusen,4)pseudodrusen with or without soft drusen,5)exudative AMD/scarring based on the criteria as we previously described[23]. All patients received 3-monthly intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) followed by monthly follow-up. BCVA and IOP measurement, biomicroscopy with or without 78D lens and a crosshair OCT scan were examined for all study eyes at each visit. If intraretinal/subretinal fluid was detected on SD-OCT or new macular hemorrhage were found on ophthalmoscopy, single additional intravitreal aflibercept injection was administrated.

Genotyping

A peripheral blood sample (5 ml) was collected when baseline FA/ICGA was performed. Genomic DNA was purified using PureGene Isolation Kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, US). The variants of ARMS2 A69S(rs10490924), CFH I62V(rs800292), CFH rs1329428, C2-CFB-SKIV2L rs429608, C3 rs2241394, CETP rs3764261, ADAMTS9 rs6795735 were selected to genotype in the present study because these variants were reported to have a strong association with AMD in the Japanese population. Because the T allele of CFH rs1329428 was reported to be associated with central serous chorioretinopathy and choroidal vascular hyperpermeability in eyes with PCV[17,20], the CFH I62V variant was also included in our genotyping analysis. Genotyping was performed using TaqMan genotyping assays with 7300/7500 Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with manufacturers’ recommendation as we previously described[20,24].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using DR. SPSS for Windows (IBM, Tokyo, Japan). BCVA measured with decimal format using Landolt chart was converted to the logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (log MAR) for statistical analysis. Differences in categorical variables were examined using chi-square test. Difference in continuous variables between 2 groups and 3 groups were examined using Mann-Whitney U test and analysis of variance, respectively. Adjusted p-value was obtained using multivariate linear regression analysis. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In addition, we genotyped 7 genetic variants and assumed that these 7 genetic variants were statistically independent, we used the Bonferroni correction, which require less than 0.0071(0.05/7) to reach a statistical significance.
  21 in total

Review 1.  The prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryo Kawasaki; Miho Yasuda; Su Jeong Song; Shih-Jen Chen; Jost B Jonas; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Association of LOC387715 A69S with vitreous hemorrhage in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  Yoichi Sakurada; Takeo Kubota; Fumihiko Mabuchi; Mitsuhiro Imasawa; Naohiko Tanabe; Hiroyuki Iijima
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  A missense variant in FGD6 confers increased risk of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  Lulin Huang; Houbin Zhang; Ching-Yu Cheng; Feng Wen; Pancy O S Tam; Peiquan Zhao; Haoyu Chen; Zheng Li; Lijia Chen; Zhengfu Tai; Kenji Yamashiro; Shaoping Deng; Xianjun Zhu; Weiqi Chen; Li Cai; Fang Lu; Yuanfeng Li; Chui-Ming G Cheung; Yi Shi; Masahiro Miyake; Yin Lin; Bo Gong; Xiaoqi Liu; Kar-Seng Sim; Jiyun Yang; Keisuke Mori; Xiongzhe Zhang; Peter D Cackett; Motokazu Tsujikawa; Kohji Nishida; Fang Hao; Shi Ma; He Lin; Jing Cheng; Ping Fei; Timothy Y Y Lai; Sibo Tang; Augustinus Laude; Satoshi Inoue; Ian Y Yeo; Yoichi Sakurada; Yu Zhou; Hiroyuki Iijima; Shigeru Honda; Chuntao Lei; Lin Zhang; Hong Zheng; Dan Jiang; Xiong Zhu; Tien-Ying Wong; Chiea-Chuen Khor; Chi-Pui Pang; Nagahisa Yoshimura; Zhenglin Yang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Role of complement factor H I62V and age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2 A69S variants in the clinical expression of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  Yoichi Sakurada; Takeo Kubota; Mitsuhiro Imasawa; Fumihiko Mabuchi; Yasushi Tateno; Naohiko Tanabe; Hiroyuki Iijima
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Angiographic lesion size associated with LOC387715 A69S genotype in subfoveal polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  Yoichi Sakurada; Takeo Kubota; Mitsuhiro Imasawa; Toyoaki Tsumura; Fumihiko Mabuchi; Naohiko Tanabe; Hiroyuki Iijima
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Clinical phenotypes associated with the complement factor H Y402H variant in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Milam A Brantley; Sean L Edelstein; Jennifer M King; Rajendra S Apte; Steven M Kymes; Alan Shiels
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Heier; David M Brown; Victor Chong; Jean-Francois Korobelnik; Peter K Kaiser; Quan Dong Nguyen; Bernd Kirchhof; Allen Ho; Yuichiro Ogura; George D Yancopoulos; Neil Stahl; Robert Vitti; Alyson J Berliner; Yuhwen Soo; Majid Anderesi; Georg Groetzbach; Bernd Sommerauer; Rupert Sandbrink; Christian Simader; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  New loci and coding variants confer risk for age-related macular degeneration in East Asians.

Authors:  Ching-Yu Cheng; Kenji Yamashiro; Li Jia Chen; Jeeyun Ahn; Lulin Huang; Lvzhen Huang; Chui Ming G Cheung; Masahiro Miyake; Peter D Cackett; Ian Y Yeo; Augustinus Laude; Ranjana Mathur; Junxiong Pang; Kar Seng Sim; Adrian H Koh; Peng Chen; Shu Yen Lee; Doric Wong; Choi Mun Chan; Boon Kwang Loh; Yaoyao Sun; Sonia Davila; Isao Nakata; Hideo Nakanishi; Yumiko Akagi-Kurashige; Norimoto Gotoh; Akitaka Tsujikawa; Fumihiko Matsuda; Keisuke Mori; Shin Yoneya; Yoichi Sakurada; Hiroyuki Iijima; Tomohiro Iida; Shigeru Honda; Timothy Yuk Yau Lai; Pancy Oi Sin Tam; Haoyu Chen; Shibo Tang; Xiaoyan Ding; Feng Wen; Fang Lu; Xiongze Zhang; Yi Shi; Peiquan Zhao; Bowen Zhao; Jinghong Sang; Bo Gong; Rajkumar Dorajoo; Jian-Min Yuan; Woon-Puay Koh; Rob M van Dam; Yechiel Friedlander; Ying Lin; Martin L Hibberd; Jia Nee Foo; Ningli Wang; Chang Hua Wong; Gavin S Tan; Sang Jun Park; Mayuri Bhargava; Lingam Gopal; Thet Naing; Jiemin Liao; Peng Guan Ong; Paul Mitchell; Peng Zhou; Xuefeng Xie; Jinlong Liang; Junpu Mei; Xin Jin; Seang-Mei Saw; Mineo Ozaki; Takanori Mizoguchi; Yasuo Kurimoto; Se Joon Woo; Hum Chung; Hyeong-Gon Yu; Joo Young Shin; Dong Ho Park; In Taek Kim; Woohyok Chang; Min Sagong; Sang-Joon Lee; Hyun Woong Kim; Ji Eun Lee; Yi Li; Jianjun Liu; Yik Ying Teo; Chew Kiat Heng; Tock Han Lim; Suk-Kyun Yang; Kyuyoung Song; Eranga N Vithana; Tin Aung; Jin Xin Bei; Yi Xin Zeng; E Shyong Tai; Xiao Xin Li; Zhenglin Yang; Kyu-Hyung Park; Chi Pui Pang; Nagahisa Yoshimura; Tien Yin Wong; Chiea Chuen Khor
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Prevalence and Genetic Characteristics of Geographic Atrophy among Elderly Japanese with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Yoichi Sakurada; Seigo Yoneyama; Atsushi Sugiyama; Naohiko Tanabe; Wataru Kikushima; Fumihiko Mabuchi; Atsuki Kume; Takeo Kubota; Hiroyuki Iijima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A prospective multicenter study on genome wide associations to ranibizumab treatment outcome for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Kenji Yamashiro; Keisuke Mori; Shigeru Honda; Mariko Kano; Yasuo Yanagi; Akira Obana; Yoichi Sakurada; Taku Sato; Yoshimi Nagai; Taiichi Hikichi; Yasushi Kataoka; Chikako Hara; Yasurou Koyama; Hideki Koizumi; Munemitsu Yoshikawa; Masahiro Miyake; Isao Nakata; Takashi Tsuchihashi; Kuniko Horie-Inoue; Wataru Matsumiya; Masashi Ogasawara; Ryo Obata; Seigo Yoneyama; Hidetaka Matsumoto; Masayuki Ohnaka; Hirokuni Kitamei; Kaori Sayanagi; Sotaro Ooto; Hiroshi Tamura; Akio Oishi; Sho Kabasawa; Kazuhiro Ueyama; Akiko Miki; Naoshi Kondo; Hiroaki Bessho; Masaaki Saito; Hidenori Takahashi; Xue Tan; Keiko Azuma; Wataru Kikushima; Ryo Mukai; Akihiro Ohira; Fumi Gomi; Kazunori Miyata; Kanji Takahashi; Shoji Kishi; Hiroyuki Iijima; Tetsuju Sekiryu; Tomohiro Iida; Takuya Awata; Satoshi Inoue; Ryo Yamada; Fumihiko Matsuda; Akitaka Tsujikawa; Akira Negi; Shin Yoneya; Takeshi Iwata; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genetic Variants Affecting Anti-VEGF Drug Response in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xando Díaz-Villamarín; David Blánquez-Martínez; Ana Pozo-Agundo; Ana María Pérez-Gutiérrez; José Ignacio Muñoz-Ávila; Alba Antúnez-Rodríguez; Ana Estefanía Fernández-Gómez; Paloma García-Navas; Luis Javier Martínez-González; Cristina Lucía Dávila-Fajardo
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 2.  Molecular Genetic Mechanisms in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Aumer Shughoury; Duriye Damla Sevgi; Thomas A Ciulla
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 3.  Zinc and Autophagy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Janusz Blasiak; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Jan Chojnacki; Joanna Szczepanska; Cezary Chojnacki; Kai Kaarniranta
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.