Literature DB >> 32344177

In vitro testing of combined hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on SARS-CoV-2 shows synergistic effect.

Julien Andreani1, Marion Le Bideau1, Isabelle Duflot1, Priscilla Jardot1, Clara Rolland1, Manon Boxberger1, Nathalie Wurtz1, Jean-Marc Rolain1, Philippe Colson1, Bernard La Scola2, Didier Raoult3.   

Abstract

Human coronaviruses SARS-CoV-2 appeared at the end of 2019 and led to a pandemic with high morbidity and mortality. As there are currently no effective drugs targeting this virus, drug repurposing represents a short-term strategy to treat millions of infected patients at low costs. Hydroxychloroquine showed an antiviral effect in vitro. In vivo it showed efficacy, especially when combined with azithromycin in a preliminary clinical trial. Here we demonstrate that the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin has a synergistic effect in vitro on SARS-CoV-2 at concentrations compatible with that obtained in human lung.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2019-nCoV; Azithromycin; COVID-19; Hydroxychloroquine; SARS-CoV-2; Vero E6

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32344177      PMCID: PMC7182748          DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Pathog        ISSN: 0882-4010            Impact factor:   3.738


Introduction

Since the end of 2019, the world has encountered pandemic conditions attributable to a novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV 2 [[1], [2], [3]]. This is the 7th Coronavirus identified to infect the human population [1,4,5] and the first one that had pandemic potential in non-immune populations in the 21st century [6]. Finding therapeutics is thus crucial, and it is proposed to do so by repurposing existing drugs [[7], [8], [9]]. This strategy presents the advantages that safety profiles of such drugs are known and that they could be easily produced at relatively low cost, thus being quicker to deploy than new drugs or a vaccine. Chloroquine, a decades-old antimalarial agent, an analog of quinine, was known to inhibit the acidification of intracellular compartments [10] and has shown in vitro and in vivo (mice models) activity against different subtypes of Coronaviruses: SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, HCoV-229E and HCoV-OC43 [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. In 2004 it was tested in vitro against SARS-CoV [17] and caused a 99% reduction of viral replication after 3 days at 16 μM. Moreover, tests in vitro have shown inhibition of viral replication on SARS-CoV 2 detected by PCR and by CCK-8 assay [18]. Hydroxychloroquine (hydroxychloroquine sulfate; 7-Chloro-4-[4-(N-ethyl-N-b-hydroxyethylamino)-1-methylbutylamino]quinoline sulfate) has shown activity against SARS-CoV2 in vitro and exhibited a less toxic profile [19]. This drug is well known and currently used mostly to treat autoimmune diseases and also by our team to treat Q fever disease [20,21] and Whipple's disease [22,23]. In those clinical contexts, concentrations obtained in serum are close to 0.4–1 μg/mL at the dose of 600 mg per day over several months [24]. Clinical tests of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 are underway in China [25], with such trials using hydroxychloroquine in progress in the US (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04307693) and in Europe with the Discovery Trial. In this drug repurposing effort, antibacterial components have also been tested. Teicoplanin, a glycopeptide, was demonstrated in vitro to inhibit cellular penetration of Ebola virus [26] and SARS-CoV 2 [26,27]. Azithromycin (azithromycin dihydrate), a macrolide, N-Methyl-11-aza-10-deoxo-10-dihydroerythromycin A, has shown antiviral activity against Zika [[28], [29], [30]]. Azithromycin is a well-known and safe drug, widely prescribed in the US, for example, with 12 million treatment courses in children under 19 years of age alone [31]. A recent study has identified these two compounds (azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine) among 97 total potentially active agents as possible treatments for this disease [32]. In a preliminary clinical study, hydroxychloroquine and, with even greater potency, the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were found effective in reducing the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in COVID-19 patients [33]. Since the beginning of the epidemic in the Marseille region we isolated numerous strains and we tested one of them, the SARS-CoV-2 IHUMI-3, using different concentrations of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in combination, with Vero E6 cells.

Materials and methods

Viral isolation procedure and viral stock

The procedure of viral isolation of our SARS-Cov 2 strain IHUMI-3 was detailed elsewhere [33]. The viral production was done in 75 cm2 cell culture flask containing Vero E6 cells (American type culture collection ATCC® CRL-1586™) in Minimum Essential Media (Gibco, ThermoFischer) (MEM) with 4% of fetal bovine serum and 1% glutamine. Cytopathic effect was monitored daily under an inverted microscope (Fig. 1 ). After nearly complete cell lysis (approximately 96 h), viral supernatant was used for inoculation on 96-well plate. We determined the TCID50 of the strain at 5.105 infectious particles per mL.
Fig. 1

Observations of infected cells resistant or not to viral replication after inoculation of SARS-CoV 2 strain IHUMI-3 at MOI 0.25.

Observations of infected cells resistant or not to viral replication after inoculation of SARS-CoV 2 strain IHUMI-3 at MOI 0.25.

Testing procedure for drugs

Briefly, we prepared 96-well plates with 5.105 cells/mL of Vero E6 (200 μL per well), using MEM with 4% of fetal bovine serum and 1% l-glutamine. Plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C in a CO2 atmosphere. Drug concentrations tested, expressed in micromoles per liter (μM), were 1, 2 or 5 μM for hydroxychloroquine associated with 5 or 10 μM for azithromycin. Each test was done at least in triplicate and repeated two times except conditions with 5 μM for hydroxychloroquine associated with 5 or 10 μM for azithromycin that were repeated a third time. Four hours before infection, cell culture supernatant was removed and replaced by drugs diluted in the culture medium. At t = 0, virus suspension in culture medium was added to all wells except in negative controls where 50 μL of the medium was added. Multiplicity of infection (MOI) was of 0.25. Then RT-PCR was done 30 min post-infection in one plate and again at 60 h post-infection on a second plate. For this, 100 μL from each well was collected and added to 100 μL of the ready-use VXL buffer from QIAcube kit (Qiagen, Germany). The extraction was done using the manual High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche Life Science), following the recommended procedures. The RT-PCR was done using the Roche RealTime PCR Ready RNA Virus Master Kit. The primers were designed against the E gene using the protocol of Amrane et al. [34] in the Roche LightCycler® 480 Instrument II. Relative viral quantification was done compare to the positive control (viruses without drugs) by the 2∧(–delta delta CT) method [35]. We performed a statistical analysis using GraphPad Prism v9.0.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA). Distribution of the data not followed a normal law. So, non parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare each combinations against positive controls using ΔCt between H0 and H60. Then, Dunn's test was used to correct the multiple comparison. All test was used at p = 0,05 parameter and were bilateral (two-sides) and significant P-value was indicated on Fig. 2 . All others conditions was not significant.
Fig. 2

Effect of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin association on SARS-CoV 2 replication.

2A. Delta Ct between 0 and 60 h post infection. Ordered axis represents the variation of delta cycle-thresholds obtained by RT-PCR between H0 and H60 for each condition. Each point represents data obtained for one well. Number of replicates was indicated for each conditions are A10H5 n = 16, A10H2 n = 5, A10H1 n = 5, A5H5 n = 15, A5H2 n = 5, A5H1 n = 3, A2H5 n = 3, A2H2 n = 3, A2H1 n = 3 and n = 13 for the positive control. Median and interquartile range were indicated for each condition. *** represent significant results under p < 0,0005. Others are not significant compared to the control.

2B. Percentage of inhibition as compared to control by the combinations of 5 μM of hydroxychloroquine associated with 5 or 10 μM for azithromycin. Data represent the mean ± SD, representing three independent experiments conducted at least in triplicate.

Effect of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin association on SARS-CoV 2 replication. 2A. Delta Ct between 0 and 60 h post infection. Ordered axis represents the variation of delta cycle-thresholds obtained by RT-PCR between H0 and H60 for each condition. Each point represents data obtained for one well. Number of replicates was indicated for each conditions are A10H5 n = 16, A10H2 n = 5, A10H1 n = 5, A5H5 n = 15, A5H2 n = 5, A5H1 n = 3, A2H5 n = 3, A2H2 n = 3, A2H1 n = 3 and n = 13 for the positive control. Median and interquartile range were indicated for each condition. *** represent significant results under p < 0,0005. Others are not significant compared to the control. 2B. Percentage of inhibition as compared to control by the combinations of 5 μM of hydroxychloroquine associated with 5 or 10 μM for azithromycin. Data represent the mean ± SD, representing three independent experiments conducted at least in triplicate.

Results

No cytotoxicity was associated with drugs in combination in all 13 control wells (without viruses). We detected RNA viral production from 25 to 16 cycle-thresholds (Ct, inversely correlated with RNA copy numbers) for the positive control that was associated with cell lyses. In all cases, cell lyses at 60 h was correlated with viral production as compared to control (Fig. 1). Combination of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine led to significant inhibition of viral replication for wells containing hydroxychloroquine at 5 μM in combination with azithromycin at 10 and 5 μM (P-values at 0,0003 for A10H5 and at 0,0004 for A5H5) (Fig. 2A) with relative viral inhibition of 97.5% and 99.1% respectively (Fig. 2B). Others conditions were not significant. In agreement with the relative viral RNA load reduction, a cytopathic effect could be observed in 5/31 wells at 60 h post infection as compared to 13/13 in positive controls.

Discussion

In the work we identified a strong synergistic effect of the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Hydroxychloroquine has been demonstrated in vitro to inhibit replication of SARS-CoVs 1 and 2 [17,19]. Concentrations of drugs for our study were based on the known cytotoxicity of the drugs (50% of cytotoxicity, CC 50) and their effect on microorganisms (50% inhibitory concentration, IC50). With Zika virus, azithromycin showed activity with an IC 50 range from 2.1 to 5.1 μM depending on MOI [28] without notable effect on EC 50 at high concentration [29]. The observation of efficacy of azithromycin on RNA viruses is probably shared by some other macrolides. Clarithromycin or the non antibiotic macrolide EM900 were observed as effective on rhinovirus in vitro [[36], [37]]. In vivo sulfate of hydroxychloroquine could be imply in the modulation of the immune response by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines and by modification of the lysosome acidification procedure [38]. Those aspects may play a keystone role in severe cases of SARS-coronaviruses. Indeed, in mouse models from SARS-CoV pneumonia and lung affections was associated with cytokines storm [39]. In parallel azithromycin was known as inhibit the viral replication of Zika virus in vitro [29]. And in enlarge viral infection context, azithromycin was associated to up-regulate interferons I and III [30]. Concerning the respiratory syncytial virus, it was also shown that Macrolides reduce the acidity of the lysosome and by the down-regulation of the ICAM-1 protein (36). So, in the SARS-CoV 2 context, azithromycin could potentialize the effect of hydroxychloroquine by similar mechanism. On Vero E6 it was shown that for hydroxychloroquine, CC 50 is close to 250 μM (249.50 μM), which is significantly above the concentrations we tested herein [19]. Against SARS-CoV 2, the IC 50 of hydroxychloroquine was determined to be 4.51, 4.06, 17.31, and 12.96 μM with various MOI of 0.01, 0.02, 0.2, and 0.8, respectively. One of the main criticisms of previously published data was that drug concentrations for viral inhibition used in vitro are difficult to translate clinically due to side effects that would occur at those concentrations. The synergy between hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin that we observed herein is at concentrations achieved in vivo and detected in serum [35] and pulmonary tissues (36–37) respectively. Our data are thus in agreement with the clinical efficacy of the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin observed by Gautret et al. [33]. They support the clinical use of this drug combination, especially at the early stage of the COVID-19 infection before the patients develop respiratory distress syndrome with associated cytokine storm and become less treatable by any antiviral treatment.

Funding

This research was funded by the French Government under the “Investissements d'avenir” (Investments for the Future) program managed by the , (reference: Méditerranée Infection 10-IAHU-03), by and European funding .

Author statement

Virus culture and drug testing: JA, ML, ID, NW; Molecular biology testing: PJ, CR, MB; Analyzed the results: JA, JMR, PC, BL, DR; Wrote the manuscript: JA, BL; Conceived the study: BL, DR. Pictures were captured on ZEISS AxioCam ERC 5s, 58 h post infection. Magnitude X200.3A-B-C. overview of the monolayer in each well for the condition of azithromycin 5 μM associated with hydroxychloroquine at 5 μM, 3D. Negative control well and 3E. Positive control well. 1F. Observation was done 48 h post infection by the SARS-CoV 2 strain IHUMI-3 for the viral stock production. Magnitude X400.

Declaration of competing interest

Authors would like to declare that Didier Raoult is a consultant in microbiology for Hitachi High-Tech Corporation. Funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The others authors declare no conflict of interest.
  35 in total

1.  Fluorescence probe measurement of the intralysosomal pH in living cells and the perturbation of pH by various agents.

Authors:  S Ohkuma; B Poole
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bactericidal effect of doxycycline associated with lysosomotropic agents on Coxiella burnetii in P388D1 cells.

Authors:  D Raoult; M Drancourt; G Vestris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Azithromycin Protects against Zika virus Infection by Upregulating virus-induced Type I and III Interferon Responses.

Authors:  Chunfeng Li; Shulong Zu; Yong-Qiang Deng; Dapei Li; Kislay Parvatiyar; Natalie Quanquin; Jingzhe Shang; Nina Sun; Jiaqi Su; Zhenyang Liu; Min Wang; Saba R Aliyari; Xiao-Feng Li; Aiping Wu; Feng Ma; Yi Shi; Karin Nielsevn-Saines; Jae U Jung; Frank Xiao-Feng Qin; Cheng-Feng Qin; Genhong Cheng
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.

Authors:  Martin J Vincent; Eric Bergeron; Suzanne Benjannet; Bobbie R Erickson; Pierre E Rollin; Thomas G Ksiazek; Nabil G Seidah; Stuart T Nichol
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 5.  Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases?

Authors:  Andrea Savarino; Johan R Boelaert; Antonio Cassone; Giancarlo Majori; Roberto Cauda
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro.

Authors:  Manli Wang; Ruiyuan Cao; Leike Zhang; Xinglou Yang; Jia Liu; Mingyue Xu; Zhengli Shi; Zhihong Hu; Wu Zhong; Gengfu Xiao
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 25.617

8.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against coronavirus: what to expect for COVID-19?

Authors:  Christian A Devaux; Jean-Marc Rolain; Philippe Colson; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.283

10.  Human (non-severe acute respiratory syndrome) coronavirus infections in hospitalised children in France.

Authors:  Astrid Vabret; Julia Dina; Stéphanie Gouarin; Joëlle Petitjean; Valérie Tripey; Jacques Brouard; François Freymuth
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 1.954

View more
  92 in total

1.  Will Cannabis or Cannabinoids Protect You from SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Treat COVID-19?

Authors:  Joshua D Brown; Amie J Goodin
Journal:  Med Cannabis Cannabinoids       Date:  2022-02-25

Review 2.  COVID-19, cytokines, inflammation, and spices: How are they related?

Authors:  Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Varsha Rana; Dey Parama; Kishore Banik; Sosmitha Girisa; Sahu Henamayee; Krishan Kumar Thakur; Uma Dutta; Prachi Garodia; Subash C Gupta; Bharat B Aggarwal
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 3.  The Rise and Fall of Hydroxychloroquine with the COVID-19 Pandemic: Narrative Review of Selected Data.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Leila Khalili; Jon Giles; Yevgeniya Gartshteyn; Teja Kapoor; Cathy Guo; Tommy Chen; Deborah Theodore; Anca Askanase
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2021-05-24

Review 4.  Repurposing of antibiotics for clinical management of COVID-19: a narrative review.

Authors:  Abdourahamane Yacouba; Ahmed Olowo-Okere; Ismaeel Yunusa
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 5.  Cytokine Storm: The Primary Determinant for the Pathophysiological Evolution of COVID-19 Deterioration.

Authors:  Ruirong Chen; Zhien Lan; Jujian Ye; Limin Pang; Yi Liu; Wei Wu; Xiaohuan Qin; Yang Guo; Peidong Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Multi-Compartment Lymph-Node-on-a-Chip Enables Measurement of Immune Cell Motility in Response to Drugs.

Authors:  Nicholas Hallfors; Aya Shanti; Jiranuwat Sapudom; Jeremy Teo; Georg Petroianu; SungMun Lee; Lourdes Planelles; Cesare Stefanini
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31

7.  The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treatment of COVID19 -a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anirban Hom Choudhuri; Sakshi Duggal; Bhuvna Ahuja; Partha Sarathi Biswas
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 0.985

8.  Janus sword actions of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19.

Authors:  Xuesong Chen; Jonathan D Geiger
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.315

9.  Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) decreases the benefit of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Janna Krueger; Francois Santinon; Alexandra Kazanova; Mark E Issa; Bruno Larrivee; Richard Kremer; Catalin Milhalcioiu; Christopher E Rudd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  COVID-19 challenges and its therapeutics.

Authors:  Sabi Ur Rehman; Shaheed Ur Rehman; Hye Hyun Yoo
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 6.529

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.