Literature DB >> 32344025

Point of View of the Dutch Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy on Surgery during the Coronavirus 2019 Crisis.

Celine Radder1, Robert de Leeuw1, Sjors Coppus2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32344025      PMCID: PMC7194938          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: We are still in the middle of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic with almost 2 million confirmed cases and 123 000 deaths worldwide [1,2]. As a result, a second crisis has become visible: a reservoir of delayed elective surgeries and the consequences of postponed treatment of less urgent complaints. Currently, in the Netherlands, elective gynecologic surgery has been put on hold because anesthesiologists and operating room personnel are needed in intensive care units, limiting available resources. As acute surgery is still being performed, the debate regarding safe procedures and prevention of unnecessary risks is a hot topic. Despite numerous international safety statements and 2 Dutch guidelines [3,4], a discussion is ongoing regarding the following 2 important questions: “How can we accurately screen for COVID-19 before surgery, and is this even needed?” and “What are the contamination agents during surgery, and what precautions should be taken to protect healthcare providers (HCPs)?” [3,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] Though based on limited evidence [11,12], the guidelines suggest performing polymerase chain reaction tests and computed tomography scans for asymptomatic patients, preferably 48 hours before surgery. We fear that the suggested preference for computed tomography scan–testing with significantly higher sensitivity [11,13,14] might become a bottleneck in the future for preoperative screening owing to limited capacity [15,16]. The second question concerns the contaminating agents. These can be divided into 3 groups: proven contagious; possible presence of RNA; and undefined but possibly not contagious. The first group, comprising droplets and aerosols produced during the surgical procedures, especially during intubation and extubation 17, 18, 19, is taken care of by using additional protective measures. The second group, for example, surgical smoke, blood, and removed tissue [20,21], is surrounded by multi-interpretable arguments and ambiguous considerations such as excessive protection and the threat of lack of resources or unnecessary costs. And, finally, the unknown instances, for example, carbon dioxide from the pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy. The Dutch Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy supports the international and national statements, and recommends the following guidelines for surgery on a patient who has tested positive for COVID-19: Elective surgery should be delayed for a period of 2 weeks or performed after repeated testing for COVID-19 is negative. Personal protective equipment for the surgeon during (laparoscopic) surgery must include eye protection, a waterproof gown, and a surgical mask that conforms to at least the type IIR standards. There is no reason to perform a laparotomy when laparoscopy is normally the procedure of first choice. There is no moratorium on vaginal or hysteroscopic surgeries, which can be performed using normal protective methods. To decrease the contamination risk for HCPs during laparoscopy, we advise low-pressure operating rooms during intubation and extubation, if possible; balloon trocars that minimize gas leakage; active evacuation of surgical smoke and carbon dioxide in a closed circuit; removal of tissue after desufflating the abdomen; and allowing the operating room air to be sufficiently refreshed before attending new surgery [3]. With the availability of national guidelines and support from international societies, we sincerely hope that we can find the means to perform safe surgery and protect patients and HCPs. On behalf of the Dutch Society of Gynaecological Surgery.
  9 in total

1.  Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.

Authors:  Wenling Wang; Yanli Xu; Ruqin Gao; Roujian Lu; Kai Han; Guizhen Wu; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the feces of COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Yifei Chen; Liangjun Chen; Qiaoling Deng; Guqin Zhang; Kaisong Wu; Lan Ni; Yibin Yang; Bing Liu; Wei Wang; Chaojie Wei; Jiong Yang; Guangming Ye; Zhenshun Cheng
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR.

Authors:  Yicheng Fang; Huangqi Zhang; Jicheng Xie; Minjie Lin; Lingjun Ying; Peipei Pang; Wenbin Ji
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Chest CT Findings in Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19): Relationship to Duration of Infection.

Authors:  Adam Bernheim; Xueyan Mei; Mingqian Huang; Yang Yang; Zahi A Fayad; Ning Zhang; Kaiyue Diao; Bin Lin; Xiqi Zhu; Kunwei Li; Shaolin Li; Hong Shan; Adam Jacobi; Michael Chung
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases.

Authors:  Tao Ai; Zhenlu Yang; Hongyan Hou; Chenao Zhan; Chong Chen; Wenzhi Lv; Qian Tao; Ziyong Sun; Liming Xia
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Heshui Shi; Xiaoyu Han; Nanchuan Jiang; Yukun Cao; Osamah Alwalid; Jin Gu; Yanqing Fan; Chuansheng Zheng
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the department of endoscopy should know.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Roberta Maselli; Matteo Colombo; Roberto Gabbiadini; Marco Spadaccini; Andrea Anderloni; Silvia Carrara; Alessandro Fugazza; Milena Di Leo; Piera Alessia Galtieri; Gaia Pellegatta; Elisa Chiara Ferrara; Elena Azzolini; Michele Lagioia
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Radiology Department Preparedness for COVID-19: Radiology Scientific Expert Review Panel.

Authors:  Mahmud Mossa-Basha; Carolyn C Meltzer; Danny C Kim; Michael J Tuite; K Pallav Kolli; Bien Soo Tan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Joint Statement on Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.137

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  JMIG during the COVID-19 Crisis: Drawing on our International Expertise.

Authors:  Gary N Frishman; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.137

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.