Arianna Rigon1,2, Justin Reber3, Nirav N Patel1, Melissa C Duff1. 1. Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN, USA. 2. Department of Communication Disorders, Marshall University , Huntington, WV, USA. 3. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA, USA.
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The current study examined how creative divergent thinking (i.e., the ability to produce varied and original solutions to a problem) is impacted by moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: Descriptive, observational. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We administered two tasks of divergent thinking, the Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA) and the Alternative Uses Test (AUT), as well as a battery of neuropsychological tests and psychosocial variables (assessing memory and learning, processing speed, set shifting and psychological distress), to 29 individuals with TBI and 20 demographically-matched healthy comparison participants. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Individuals with TBI performed similarly to healthy individuals on both tests of creative thinking, although they were impaired on the neuropsychological tasks. Moreover, there was no significant correlation between performance on the ATTA and performance on neuropsychological tests, but within the TBI group AUT performance and memory were significantly and positively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal that divergent thinking, as measured by the ATTA and AUT, might be spared following moderate-to-severe TBI. These findings further our understanding of the higher-level cognitive sequelae of TBI and suggest that divergent thinking might be leveraged during treatment planning.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The current study examined how creative divergent thinking (i.e., the ability to produce varied and original solutions to a problem) is impacted by moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: Descriptive, observational. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We administered two tasks of divergent thinking, the Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA) and the Alternative Uses Test (AUT), as well as a battery of neuropsychological tests and psychosocial variables (assessing memory and learning, processing speed, set shifting and psychological distress), to 29 individuals with TBI and 20 demographically-matched healthy comparison participants. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Individuals with TBI performed similarly to healthy individuals on both tests of creative thinking, although they were impaired on the neuropsychological tasks. Moreover, there was no significant correlation between performance on the ATTA and performance on neuropsychological tests, but within the TBI group AUT performance and memory were significantly and positively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal that divergent thinking, as measured by the ATTA and AUT, might be spared following moderate-to-severe TBI. These findings further our understanding of the higher-level cognitive sequelae of TBI and suggest that divergent thinking might be leveraged during treatment planning.
Authors: Steven Paul Woods; Anastasia Matchanova; Christina Alex; Samina Rahman; Michelle A Babicz; Kelli L Sullivan; Gunes Avci; Rodrigo Hasbun; Pariya L Fazeli; Thomas P Giordano Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 3.739