Literature DB >> 32342517

What is the threshold dose of upper limb training for children with cerebral palsy to improve function? A systematic review.

Michelle Jackman1, Natasha Lannin2, Claire Galea3, Leanne Sakzewski4, Laura Miller5, Iona Novak3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Neuroplasticity is harnessed through high-intensity or high-dose training. Given the costs and time burden for families of children with cerebral palsy (CP), it is important to quantify which rehabilitation training approaches and doses confer the largest clinical gain. The main objective of this systematic review was to determine any threshold dose of upper limb training needed for children with CP to achieve clinically significant functional improvements.
METHODS: This systematic review included studies if they were as follows: randomised controlled trials; participants had a diagnosis of CP or brain injury; mean age of participants was 0-18 years; and intervention was an active upper limb training intervention. Two raters independently extracted data. Data were pooled and analysed using a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and odds ratios to investigate the dose of practice that led to clinically significant gains.
RESULTS: A total of 74 trials were included in this review. Quantitative analyses included 25 studies (707 participants; age range 18 months to 21 years) for motor function (Assisting Hand Assessment) and 20 studies (491 participants; age range 3 months to 17 years) for individual goal achievement (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure). ROC curve analyses found that approximately 40 hr of practice is needed to improve upper limb motor ability in the unilateral population. For all typographies of CP, individual goals were achieved at a lower dose (14-25 hr) of practice when goal-directed interventions were provided.
CONCLUSION: To improve individual goals, children need to practice goals for more than 14-25 hr, combining face-to-face therapy with home practice. To improve general upper limb function (based on evidence in the unilateral population), children need to practice for more than 30-40 hr. Interventions that set functional goals and involve actual practice of those goals lead to goal achievement at a lower dose than general upper limb motor training.
© 2020 Occupational Therapy Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebral palsy; motor training; neuroplasticity; occupational therapy; physiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32342517     DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J        ISSN: 0045-0766            Impact factor:   1.856


  7 in total

Review 1.  Childhood stroke.

Authors:  Peter B Sporns; Heather J Fullerton; Sarah Lee; Helen Kim; Warren D Lo; Mark T Mackay; Moritz Wildgruber
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 52.329

2.  Daily Outpatient Physical Therapy for a Toddler With a Neurodegenerative Disease: A Case Report.

Authors:  Rachel Bican; Rachel Ferrante; Sarah Hendershot; Michelle Byars; Warren Lo; Jill C Heathcock
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.452

3.  Single-centre parental survey of paediatric rehabilitation services for children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Rachel Bican; Rachel Ferrante; Sarah Hendershot; Jill C Heathcock
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-03-30

4.  Physical ACTivity in Survivorship (PACTS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating a goal-directed therapeutic exercise program in pediatric posterior fossa brain tumor survivors.

Authors:  Brooke E Kohler; Emmah Baque; Carolina X Sandler; Denise S K Brookes; Caroline O Terranova; Matthew Rixon; Tim Hassall; Stewart G Trost
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Kindy Moves: a protocol for establishing the feasibility of an activity-based intervention on goal attainment and motor capacity delivered within an interdisciplinary framework for preschool aged children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Dayna Pool; Catherine Elliott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Experiences of patients who had a stroke and rehabilitation professionals with upper limb rehabilitation robots: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Manigandan Chockalingam; Lenny Thinagaran Vasanthan; Sivakumar Balasubramanian; Vimal Sriram
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 7.  Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Decision-Making: The READ Model.

Authors:  Iona Novak; Anna Te Velde; Ashleigh Hines; Emma Stanton; Maria Mc Namara; Madison C B Paton; Megan Finch-Edmondson; Catherine Morgan
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-10-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.