| Literature DB >> 32341788 |
Berglind Adalsteinsdottir1,2, Michael Burke3,4, Barry J Maron5, Ragnar Danielsen2, Begoña Lopez6,7, Javier Diez6,7, Petr Jarolim8, Jonathan Seidman3, Christine E Seidman3,9,10, Carolyn Y Ho9, Gunnar Th Gunnarsson1,11.
Abstract
Objective: The myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3) c.927-2A>G founder mutation accounts for >90% of sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in Iceland. This cross-sectional observational study explored the penetrance and phenotypic burden among carriers of this single, prevalent founder mutation.Entities:
Keywords: cardiomyopathy hypertrophic; echocardiography; genetics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32341788 PMCID: PMC7174027 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Heart ISSN: 2053-3624
Figure 1A flow diagram demonstrating the study cohort. *27 individuals were excluded due to hypertension and/or coronary artery disease, and 2 because of metastatic cancer.
Baseline clinical characteristics by study group
| HCM | Relatives | P value | P value G+/LVH− versus unaffected | |||
| G+/LVH+ | G+/LVH− | Unaffected | ||||
| (n=60) | (n=49) | (n=59) | (n=117) | |||
| Age at enrolment, years | 53±17 | 50±19 | 34±17 | 40±18 | 0.379 | 0.100 |
| Age at HCM diagnosis, years | 41±14 | 50±19 | 0.004 | |||
| Male | 40 (67%) | 27 (55%) | 19 (32%) | 55 (47%) | 0.217 | 0.060 |
| Reason for diagnosis | ||||||
| Symptoms | 24 (40%) | |||||
| Incidental finding* | 22 (37%) | |||||
| Prior screening† | 14 (23%) | |||||
| Body surface area (kg/m2) | 2.01±0.22 | 1.99±0.23 | 1.76±0.30 | 1.92±0.36 | 0.982 | 0.169 |
| Blood pressure, mm Hg | ||||||
| Systolic | 120±13 | 125±12 | 117±13 | 122±14 | 0.037 | 0.360 |
| Diastolic | 73±9 | 75±10 | 70±9 | 74±10 | 0.075 | 0.605 |
| NYHA class | <0.0001 | 0.994 | ||||
| I | 31 (52%) | 47 (96%) | 58 (98%) | 115 (98%) | ||
| II | 26 (43%) | 2 (4%) | 1 (2%) | 2 (2%) | ||
| III | 3 (5%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| IV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Medication use | ||||||
| Amiodarone | 5 (8%) | 1 (2%) | 0 | 0 | 0.152 | |
| Anticoagulation | 4 (7%) | 1 (2%) | 0 | 0 | 0.251 | |
| ACE inhibitor/ARB | 10 (17%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.021 | |
| β-blocker | 36 (60%) | 11 (22%) | 3 (5%) | 0 | <0.0001 | 0.036 |
| Calcium channel blocker | 6 (10%) | 3 (6%) | 0 | 0 | 0.464 | |
| No cardiovascular medications | 17 (28%) | 37 (76%) | 56 (95%) | 117 (100%) | <0.0001 | 0.036 |
| History of atrial fibrillation | 11 (18%) | 4 (8%) | 0 | 0 | 0.126 | |
| Heart failure hospitalisation | 6 (10%) | 1 (2%) | 0 | 0 | 0.129 | |
| History of stroke/TIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.9%) | 1.00 | |
| Unexplained syncope | 11 (18%) | 4 (8%) | 0 | 0 | 0.135 | |
| Implantable cardioverter defibrillator | 11 (18%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | <0.0001 | |
Values are means±SD or numbers and proportions (%). P values for body surface area and blood pressure were adjusted for age and sex.
*12 had abnormal ECGs, 3 were examined because of heart murmurs and five underwent echocardiography due to other reasons.
†14 individuals were diagnosed through prior screening 14±9 years ago.
ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; G+, genotype positive; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; NYHA, New York Heart Association; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.
Echocardiographic findings and biomarker analysis
| HCM | Relatives | P value | P value G+/LVH− versus unaffected | |||
| G+/LVH+ | G+/LVH− | Unaffected | ||||
| (n=60) | (n=49) | (n=59) | (n=117) | |||
| Maximal LVWT, mm | 24.9 (0.7) | 18.2 (0.8) | 9.9 (0.2) | 9.5 (0.1) | <0.0001 | 0.032 |
| LVEDD, mm | 42.8 (1.0) | 44.0 (1.0) | 45.1 (0.7) | 46.4 (0.5) | 0.409 | 0.116 |
| LVEDD indexed to BSA, mm/m2 | 21.7 (0.5) | 22.4 (0.5) | 25.0 (0.6) | 25.4 (0.4) | 0.249 | 0.695 |
| LVESD, mm | 27.1 (0.8) | 27.6 (0.9) | 29.0 (0.6) | 30.2 (0.4) | 0.717 | 0.059 |
| LVESD indexed to BSA, mm/m2 | 13.7 (0.4) | 14.0 (0.4) | 16.1 (0.4) | 16.42 (0.3) | 0.619 | 0.331 |
| Left atrial diameter, mm | 42 (0.9) | 40.0 (1.0) | 33.6 (0.6) | 34.2 (0.4) | 0.109 | 0.406 |
| Left atrial volume indexed to BSA, mm/m2 | 46.0 (2.3) | 37.3 (2.4) | 24.6 (0.9) | 25.2 (0.6) | 0.008 | 0.596 |
| Ratio of LVWT to LVEDD | 0.61 (0.02) | 0.42 (0.02) | 0.23 (0.005) | 0.20 (0.004) | <0.0001 | 0.008 |
| Relative wall thickness | 0.51 (0.02) | 0.42 (0.02) | 0.37 (0.01) | 0.34 (0.007) | 0.001 | 0.025 |
| LVEF, % | 64.0 (1.5) | 66.4 (1.5) | 64.9 (1.0) | 63.9 (0.7) | 0.267 | 0.350 |
| Peak LV outflow tract gradient, mm Hg | 18.3 (3.0) | 8.0 (3.1) | 7.1 (0.3) | 6.7 (0.2) | 0.011 | 0.255 |
| Peak LV outflow tract gradient>30 mm Hg | 9 (15%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.003 | |
| Tissue Doppler velocities: | ||||||
| Septal E', cm/s | 5.7 (0.3) | 8.1 (0.3) | 10.1 (0.3) | 9.8 (0.2) | <0.0001 | 0.384 |
| Lateral E', cm/s | 8.2 (0.4) | 10.7 (0.4) | 13.6 (0.4) | 13.2 (0.3) | <0.0001 | 0.395 |
| Septal S', cm/s | 7.0 (0.2) | 7.7 (0.23) | 8.3 (0.20) | 8.2 (0.1) | 0.025 | 0.956 |
| Lateral S', cm/s | 7.4 (0.3) | 9.0 (0.30) | 10.2 (0.3) | 9.7 (0.2) | 0.0001 | 0.278 |
| Septal E/E' ratio, cm/s | 15.6 (0.8) | 10.7 (0.86) | 8.5 (0.3) | 8.7 (0.2) | <0.0001 | 0.549 |
| Lateral E/E' ratio, cm/s | 11.4 (0.7) | 8.3 (0.8) | 6.4 (0.3) | 6.6 (0.2) | 0.003 | 0.761 |
| Septal morphology: | ||||||
| Reverse curvature septum | 54 (90%) | 34 (69%) | 0.019 | |||
| Sigmoid septum | 2 (3.3%) | 1 (2.0%) | 0.488 | |||
| Apical hypertrophy | 0 | 3 (6.1%) | 0.052 | |||
| Neutral septum | 4 (6.7%) | 11 (22%) | 0.040 | |||
| Biomarkers | ||||||
| NT-proBNP, pg/ml | 349 (1.2) | 116 (1.2) | 50.8 (1.1) | 34.6 (1.1) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| High-sensitivity troponin I, ng/mL | 12.3 (1.2) | 3.9 (1.2) | 1.4 (1.1) | 1.1 (1.1) | <0.0001 | 0.332 |
| PICP, µg/L | 103 (4.7) | 100 (5.0) | 122 (5.5) | 118 (3.8) | 0.749 | 0.329 |
Values are adjusted means (SE) or numbers and proportions (%). P values were adjusted for age, sex and within-family correlation.
BSA, body surface area; LV, left ventricular; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LVWT, left ventricular wall thickness; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide; PICP, carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I.
Figure 2Scatter plots stratified by genotype–phenotype showing the relationship between (a) age and LVWT. There was no correlation between age and LVWT in HCM probands (red line, r=−0.11, p=0.42) and G+/LVH+ relatives (blue line, r=0.14, p=0.32). A modest linear increase in LVWT by age was noted in G+/LVH− relatives (green line, r=0.32, p=0.015) and unaffected relatives (black line, r=0.38, p<0.0001). (b) Age and LA volume indexed to BSA. There was a significant relationship between LA volume and age in G+/LVH+ relatives (blue line, r=0.49, p=0.0003), while there was no significant correlation among HCM probands (red line, r=0.17, p=0.19), G+/LVH- relatives (green line, r=−0.07, p=0.61) and unaffected relatives (black line, r=−0.02, p=0.81).
Figure 3Stacked column bars demonstrating LV diastolic function for each group. HCM probands had significantly worse diastolic function than their G+/LVH+ relatives. Diastolic function was normal in 38% of HCM probands, 71% of G+/LVH+ relatives, 97% of G+/LVH− relatives and 95% of unaffected relatives. P values were adjusted for age, sex and within-family correlation.
Figure 4Frequency of ECG abnormalities among each group. ECG abnormalities, including Cornell voltage criteria, Q waves and/or repolarisation abnormalities (QST), were significantly more prevalent among HCM probands than among their G+/LVH+relatives. The G+/LVH- relatives were less likely to have a normal ECG than their unaffected relatives. P-values were adjusted for age, sex and within-family correlation. P-values<0.05 are shown for comparison between HCM probands and G+/LVH+relatives, as well as G+/LVH- relatives vs controls.
Figure 5Clustered bar chart demonstrating the proportion (and 95% CI) of MYBPC3 c.927-2A>G mutation carriers identified through family screening with clinical evidence of LVH, by age and gender.
Comparison of MYBPC3 founder mutations in three populations
| Icelandic probands (n=60) | Dutch probands (n=134)* | Italian probands (n=19)† | Icelandic G+/LVH+ relatives | Dutch | Italian | |
| Mutation | c.927-2A>G | c.2373dupG (46%), c.2827C>T (32%), c.2864_2865 | p.F305Pfs*27 | c.927-2A>G | c.2373dupG (46%), c.2827C>T (32%), c.2864_2865 | p.F305Pfs*27 |
| Diagnosed by family screening | 100% | 100% | 72% | |||
| Male (%) | 67% | 67% | 74% | 55% | 57% | 59% |
| Age at diagnosis | 41±14 | 44±14 | 36±16 | 50±19 | 47±16 | 44±19 |
| LVWT, mean (mm) | 25 | 20 | 23 | 18 | 16 | 19 |
| LVOT gradient>30 mm Hg (%) | 15% | 28% | 16% | 0% | 4% | 14% |
| Left atrial diameter, mean (mm) | 42 | 45 | 49 | 40 | 40 | 45 |
| Diastolic dysfunction (%) | 62% | 56% | N/A | 29% | 38% | N/A |
| NYHA class≥2 (%) | 48% | 48% | 58% | 0% | 8% | 28% |
| Atrial fibrillation (%) | 18% | 21% | 21% | 8% | 7% | 14% |
| SCD/aborted SCD (%) | 8% | 14% | 32% | 0% | 4% | 7% |
| ICD (%) | 18% | 23% | 58% | 0% | 13% | 14% |
*Clinical data from Dutch subjects with MYBPC3 founder mutations reported in.2
†Clinical data from Italian subjects with a MYBPC3 founder mutation reported in.1
G+, genotype-positive; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; LVWT, left ventricular wall thickness; MYBPC3, myosin-binding protein C; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SCD, suden cardiac death.