OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that carriers of Dutch founder mutations in cardiac myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3), without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) or electrocardiographic abnormalities, have diastolic dysfunction on tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), which can be used for the screening of family members in the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) population. BACKGROUND: TDI is a more sensitive technique for the assessment of left ventricular contraction and relaxation abnormalities than is conventional echocardiography. METHODS: Echocardiographic studies including TDI were performed in genotyped hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients (genotype-positive, G+/LVH+; n = 27), mutation carriers without LVH (G+/LVH-; n = 27), and healthy controls (n = 55). The identified mutations in MYBPC3 in the G+/LVH+ subjects were c.2864_2865delCT (12 subjects), c.2373dupG (n = 8), and p. Arg943X (n = 7). In the G+/LVH- subjects, the following mutations were identified: c.2864_2865delCT (n = 11), c.2373dupG (n = 8), and p. Arg943X (n = 8). RESULTS: Mean TDI-derived systolic and early and late diastolic mitral annular velocities were significantly lower in the G+/LVH+ subjects compared with the other groups. However, there was no difference between controls and G+/LVH- subjects. Mean TDI-derived late mitral annular diastolic velocities were significantly higher in the G+/LVH- subjects compared with controls and G+/LVH+ subjects. Using a cut-off value of mean +/- 2 SD, an abnormal late mitral annular diastolic velocity was found in 14 (51%) of G+/LVH- patients. There was no difference among the 3 different mutations. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to earlier reports, mean mitral annular systolic velocity and early mitral annular diastolic velocity velocities were not reduced in G+/LVH- subjects, and TDI velocities were not sufficiently sensitive for determination of the affected status of an individual subject. Our findings, however, support the theory that diastolic dysfunction is a primary component of pre-clinical HCM.
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that carriers of Dutch founder mutations in cardiac myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3), without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) or electrocardiographic abnormalities, have diastolic dysfunction on tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), which can be used for the screening of family members in the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) population. BACKGROUND: TDI is a more sensitive technique for the assessment of left ventricular contraction and relaxation abnormalities than is conventional echocardiography. METHODS: Echocardiographic studies including TDI were performed in genotyped hypertrophic cardiomyopathypatients (genotype-positive, G+/LVH+; n = 27), mutation carriers without LVH (G+/LVH-; n = 27), and healthy controls (n = 55). The identified mutations in MYBPC3 in the G+/LVH+ subjects were c.2864_2865delCT (12 subjects), c.2373dupG (n = 8), and p. Arg943X (n = 7). In the G+/LVH- subjects, the following mutations were identified: c.2864_2865delCT (n = 11), c.2373dupG (n = 8), and p. Arg943X (n = 8). RESULTS: Mean TDI-derived systolic and early and late diastolic mitral annular velocities were significantly lower in the G+/LVH+ subjects compared with the other groups. However, there was no difference between controls and G+/LVH- subjects. Mean TDI-derived late mitral annular diastolic velocities were significantly higher in the G+/LVH- subjects compared with controls and G+/LVH+ subjects. Using a cut-off value of mean +/- 2 SD, an abnormal late mitral annular diastolic velocity was found in 14 (51%) of G+/LVH- patients. There was no difference among the 3 different mutations. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to earlier reports, mean mitral annular systolic velocity and early mitral annular diastolic velocity velocities were not reduced in G+/LVH- subjects, and TDI velocities were not sufficiently sensitive for determination of the affected status of an individual subject. Our findings, however, support the theory that diastolic dysfunction is a primary component of pre-clinical HCM.
Authors: Sabe De; Allen G Borowski; Heng Wang; Leah Nye; Baozhong Xin; James D Thomas; W H Wilson Tang Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: I Christiaans; E A Nannenberg; D Dooijes; R J E Jongbloed; M Michels; P G Postema; D Majoor-Krakauer; A van den Wijngaard; M M A M Mannens; J P van Tintelen; I M van Langen; A A M Wilde Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Jolanda van der Velden; Carolyn Y Ho; Jil C Tardiff; Iacopo Olivotto; Bjorn C Knollmann; Lucie Carrier Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: T Germans; R Nijveldt; W P Brouwer; J G J Groothuis; A M Beek; M J W Götte; A C van Rossum Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Paul J M Wijnker; Vasco Sequeira; Diederik W D Kuster; Jolanda van der Velden Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Tjeerd Germans; Iris K Rüssel; Marco J W Götte; Marieke D Spreeuwenberg; Pieter A Doevendans; Yigal M Pinto; Rob J van der Geest; Jolanda van der Velden; Arthur A M Wilde; Albert C van Rossum Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Peter O Awinda; Yemeserach Bishaw; Marissa Watanabe; Maya A Guglin; Kenneth S Campbell; Bertrand C W Tanner Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 8.739