Juan L Molina1, Bradley Voytek2, Michael L Thomas3, Yash B Joshi4, Savita G Bhakta1, Jo A Talledo1, Neal R Swerdlow5, Gregory A Light4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. 2. Department of Cognitive Sciences, Halicioğlu Data Science Institute, and Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: nswerdlow@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in cortical excitation and inhibition (E/I) balance are thought to underlie sensory and information processing deficits in schizophrenia. Deficits in early auditory information processing mediate both neurocognitive and functional impairment and appear to be normalized by acute pharmacologic challenge with the NMDA antagonist memantine (MEM). METHODS:Thirty-six subjects with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 31 healthy control subjects underwentelectroencephalographic recordings. Subjects ingested either placebo or MEM (10 or 20 mg) in a double-blind, within-subject, crossover, randomized design. The aperiodic, 1/f-like scaling property of the neural power spectra, which is thought to index relative E/I balance, was estimated using a robust linear regression algorithm. RESULTS: Patients with schizophrenia had greater aperiodic components compared with healthy control subjects (p < .01, d = 0.64), which was normalized after 20 mg MEM. Analysis revealed a significant dose × diagnosis interaction (p < .0001, d = 0.82). Furthermore, the MEM effect (change in aperiodic component in MEM vs. placebo conditions) was associated with baseline attention and vigilance (r = .54, p < .05) and MEM-induced enhancements in gamma power (r = -.60, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Findings confirmed E/I balance abnormalities in schizophrenia that were normalized with acute MEM administration and suggest that neurocognitive profiles may predict treatment response based on E/I sensitivity. These data provide proof-of-concept evidence for the utility of E/I balance indices as metrics of acute pharmacologic sensitivity for central nervous system therapeutics.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in cortical excitation and inhibition (E/I) balance are thought to underlie sensory and information processing deficits in schizophrenia. Deficits in early auditory information processing mediate both neurocognitive and functional impairment and appear to be normalized by acute pharmacologic challenge with the NMDA antagonist memantine (MEM). METHODS: Thirty-six subjects with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 31 healthy control subjects underwent electroencephalographic recordings. Subjects ingested either placebo or MEM (10 or 20 mg) in a double-blind, within-subject, crossover, randomized design. The aperiodic, 1/f-like scaling property of the neural power spectra, which is thought to index relative E/I balance, was estimated using a robust linear regression algorithm. RESULTS:Patients with schizophrenia had greater aperiodic components compared with healthy control subjects (p < .01, d = 0.64), which was normalized after 20 mg MEM. Analysis revealed a significant dose × diagnosis interaction (p < .0001, d = 0.82). Furthermore, the MEM effect (change in aperiodic component in MEM vs. placebo conditions) was associated with baseline attention and vigilance (r = .54, p < .05) and MEM-induced enhancements in gamma power (r = -.60, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Findings confirmed E/I balance abnormalities in schizophrenia that were normalized with acute MEM administration and suggest that neurocognitive profiles may predict treatment response based on E/I sensitivity. These data provide proof-of-concept evidence for the utility of E/I balance indices as metrics of acute pharmacologic sensitivity for central nervous system therapeutics.
Authors: Bradley Voytek; Mark A Kramer; John Case; Kyle Q Lepage; Zechari R Tempesta; Robert T Knight; Adam Gazzaley Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: J H Callicott; A Bertolino; V S Mattay; F J Langheim; J Duyn; R Coppola; T E Goldberg; D R Weinberger Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Alan Anticevic; Mark Gancsos; John D Murray; Grega Repovs; Naomi R Driesen; Debra J Ennis; Mark J Niciu; Peter T Morgan; Toral S Surti; Michael H Bloch; Ramachandran Ramani; Mark A Smith; Xiao-Jing Wang; John H Krystal; Philip R Corlett Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: E Fuller Torrey; Beata M Barci; Maree J Webster; John J Bartko; James H Meador-Woodruff; Michael B Knable Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Georg Winterer; Francesco Musso; Christian Beckmann; Venkata Mattay; Michael F Egan; Douglas W Jones; Joseph H Callicott; Richard Coppola; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Anthony T Lee; Steven M Gee; Daniel Vogt; Tosha Patel; John L Rubenstein; Vikaas S Sohal Journal: Neuron Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Michael L Thomas; Michael F Green; Gerhard Hellemann; Catherine A Sugar; Melissa Tarasenko; Monica E Calkins; Tiffany A Greenwood; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Laura C Lazzeroni; Keith H Nuechterlein; Allen D Radant; Larry J Seidman; Alexandra L Shiluk; Larry J Siever; Jeremy M Silverman; Joyce Sprock; William S Stone; Neal R Swerdlow; Debby W Tsuang; Ming T Tsuang; Bruce I Turetsky; David L Braff; Gregory A Light Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Thomas Donoghue; Matar Haller; Erik J Peterson; Paroma Varma; Priyadarshini Sebastian; Richard Gao; Torben Noto; Antonio H Lara; Joni D Wallis; Robert T Knight; Avgusta Shestyuk; Bradley Voytek Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Juan L Molina; Yash B Joshi; John A Nungaray; Michael L Thomas; Joyce Sprock; Peter E Clayson; Victoria A Sanchez; Mouna Attarha; Bruno Biagianti; Neal R Swerdlow; Gregory A Light Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 4.662
Authors: Neal R Swerdlow; Savita G Bhakta; Jo Talledo; Juliana Kotz; Benjamin Z Roberts; Royce Ellen Clifford; Michael L Thomas; Yash B Joshi; Juan L Molina; Gregory A Light Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Neal R Swerdlow; Juliana E Kotz; Yash B Joshi; Jo Talledo; Joyce Sprock; Juan L Molina; Branko Huisa; Steven F Huege; Jairo Alberto Romero; Michael J Walsh; Lisa Delano-Wood; Gregory A Light Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: J Lanzone; M A Colombo; S Sarasso; F Zappasodi; M Rosanova; M Massimini; V Di Lazzaro; G Assenza Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Juan L Molina; Michael L Thomas; Yash B Joshi; William C Hochberger; Daisuke Koshiyama; John A Nungaray; Lauren Cardoso; Joyce Sprock; David L Braff; Neal R Swerdlow; Gregory A Light Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Daisuke Koshiyama; Makoto Miyakoshi; Kumiko Tanaka-Koshiyama; Yash B Joshi; Juan L Molina; Joyce Sprock; David L Braff; Gregory A Light Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 4.157