Literature DB >> 33804317

Out-of-Distribution Detection of Human Activity Recognition with Smartwatch Inertial Sensors.

Philip Boyer1,2, David Burns3, Cari Whyne1,2,3.   

Abstract

Out-of-distribution (OOD) in the context of Human Activity Recognition (HAR) refers to data from activity classes that are not represented in the training data of a Machine Learning (ML) algorithm. OOD data are a challenge to classify accurately for most ML algorithms, especially deep learning models that are prone to overconfident predictions based on in-distribution (IIN) classes. To simulate the OOD problem in physiotherapy, our team collected a new dataset (SPARS9x) consisting of inertial data captured by smartwatches worn by 20 healthy subjects as they performed supervised physiotherapy exercises (IIN), followed by a minimum 3 h of data captured for each subject as they engaged in unrelated and unstructured activities (OOD). In this paper, we experiment with three traditional algorithms for OOD-detection using engineered statistical features, deep learning-generated features, and several popular deep learning approaches on SPARS9x and two other publicly-available human activity datasets (MHEALTH and SPARS). We demonstrate that, while deep learning algorithms perform better than simple traditional algorithms such as KNN with engineered features for in-distribution classification, traditional algorithms outperform deep learning approaches for OOD detection for these HAR time series datasets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anomaly detection; human activity recognition; inertial sensors; machine learning; open set classification; out of distribution; physiotherapy; rehabilitation; smart watch

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33804317      PMCID: PMC7957807          DOI: 10.3390/s21051669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  24 in total

1.  Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution.

Authors:  B Schölkopf; J C Platt; J Shawe-Taylor; A J Smola; R C Williamson
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Varying behavior of different window sizes on the classification of static and dynamic physical activities from a single accelerometer.

Authors:  Benish Fida; Ivan Bernabucci; Daniele Bibbo; Silvia Conforto; Maurizio Schmid
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Shoulder physiotherapy exercise recognition: machine learning the inertial signals from a smartwatch.

Authors:  David M Burns; Nathan Leung; Michael Hardisty; Cari M Whyne; Patrick Henry; Stewart McLachlin
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Toward open set recognition.

Authors:  Walter J Scheirer; Anderson de Rezende Rocha; Archana Sapkota; Terrance E Boult
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Survey.

Authors:  Chuanxing Geng; Sheng-Jun Huang; Songcan Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  Mathematical Modeling and Evaluation of Human Motions in Physical Therapy Using Mixture Density Neural Networks.

Authors:  A Vakanski; J M Ferguson; S Lee
Journal:  J Physiother Phys Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-11

7.  Patient classification as an outlier detection problem: an application of the One-Class Support Vector Machine.

Authors:  Janaina Mourão-Miranda; David R Hardoon; Tim Hahn; Andre F Marquand; Steve C R Williams; John Shawe-Taylor; Michael Brammer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Long-term activity recognition from wristwatch accelerometer data.

Authors:  Enrique Garcia-Ceja; Ramon F Brena; Jose C Carrasco-Jimenez; Leonardo Garrido
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  A Review of Activity Trackers for Senior Citizens: Research Perspectives, Commercial Landscape and the Role of the Insurance Industry.

Authors:  Salvatore Tedesco; John Barton; Brendan O'Flynn
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  MEMS Inertial Sensors Based Gait Analysis for Rehabilitation Assessment via Multi-Sensor Fusion.

Authors:  Sen Qiu; Long Liu; Hongyu Zhao; Zhelong Wang; Yongmei Jiang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.891

View more
  4 in total

1.  Special Issue "Wearable and BAN Sensors for Physical Rehabilitation and eHealth Architectures".

Authors:  Maria de Fátima Domingues; Andrea Sciarrone; Ayman Radwan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Personalized Activity Recognition with Deep Triplet Embeddings.

Authors:  David Burns; Philip Boyer; Colin Arrowsmith; Cari Whyne
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Detection of Low Back Physiotherapy Exercises With Inertial Sensors and Machine Learning: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Authors:  Abdalrahman Alfakir; Colin Arrowsmith; David Burns; Helen Razmjou; Michael Hardisty; Cari Whyne
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2022-08-23

4.  Comparing Handcrafted Features and Deep Neural Representations for Domain Generalization in Human Activity Recognition.

Authors:  Nuno Bento; Joana Rebelo; Marília Barandas; André V Carreiro; Andrea Campagner; Federico Cabitza; Hugo Gamboa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.847

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.