Valeria Castelletto1, Jani Seitsonen2, Kunal M Tewari3, Abshar Hasan3,4, Robert M Edkins3, Janne Ruokolainen2, Lalit M Pandey4, Ian W Hamley1, King Hang Aaron Lau3. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AD, U.K. 2. Nanomicroscopy Center, Aalto University, Puumiehenkuja 2, FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland. 3. Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G1 1XL, U.K. 4. Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India.
Abstract
Peptoids are biofunctional N-substituted glycine peptidomimics. Their self-assembly is of fundamental interest because they demonstrate alternatives to conventional peptide structures based on backbone chirality and beta-sheet hydrogen bonding. The search for self-assembling, water-soluble "minimal" sequences, be they peptide or peptidomimic, is a further challenge. Such sequences are highly desired for their compatibility with biomacromolecules and convenient synthesis for broader application. We report the self-assembly of a set of trimeric, water-soluble α-peptoids that exhibit a relatively low critical aggregation concentration (CAC ∼ 0.3 wt %). Cryo-EM and angle-resolved DLS show different sequence-dependent morphologies, namely uniform ca. 6 nm wide nanofibers, sheets, and clusters of globular assemblies. Absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopies indicate unique phenyl environments for π-interactions in the highly ordered nanofibers. Assembly of our peptoids takes place when the sequences are fully ionized, representing a departure from superficially similar amyloid-type hydrogen-bonded peptide nanostructures and expanding the horizons of assembly for sequence-specific bio- and biomimetic macromolecules.
Peptoids are biofunctional N-substituted glycine peptidomimics. Their self-assembly is of fundamental interest because they demonstrate alternatives to conventional peptide structures based on backbone chirality and beta-sheet hydrogen bonding. The search for self-assembling, water-soluble "minimal" sequences, be they peptide or peptidomimic, is a further challenge. Such sequences are highly desired for their compatibility with biomacromolecules and convenient synthesis for broader application. We report the self-assembly of a set of trimeric, water-soluble α-peptoids that exhibit a relatively low critical aggregation concentration (CAC ∼ 0.3 wt %). Cryo-EM and angle-resolved DLS show different sequence-dependent morphologies, namely uniform ca. 6 nm wide nanofibers, sheets, and clusters of globular assemblies. Absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopies indicate unique phenyl environments for π-interactions in the highly ordered nanofibers. Assembly of our peptoids takes place when the sequences are fully ionized, representing a departure from superficially similar amyloid-type hydrogen-bonded peptide nanostructures and expanding the horizons of assembly for sequence-specific bio- and biomimetic macromolecules.
Control of self-assembly using sequence-specific polymers such as
peptides and their mimics is a powerful approach to generating functional
nanomaterials. Very short self-assembling peptides and their mimics
(e.g., ≤ 5 residues) are of special interest since they are
more easily scalable and they lead to insight into assembly requirements.[1] Their discovery is nontrivial since assembly
propensity (e.g., hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding) and
favorable solvent (water) interactions must be balanced among just
a few residues.[1−3] The realization that diphenylalanine (FF) is a key
aggregating domain of amyloid peptides including amyloid β[4−6] has had an immense impact since assembly from such a simple dipeptide
was not anticipated. However, FF is not directly soluble in water,
and its assembly requires dilution from an organic solution. Assembly
of specific tripeptide derivatives of FF has also been reported, and
a number of applications for both FF and its derivatives have been
proposed.[1,7,8]Peptoids
are N-substituted glycine structural isomers of peptides,
in which the functional side chains are attached to backbone amidenitrogen atoms instead of the α-carbons.[9,10] This
preserves the side chain spacing of peptides but removes backbone
chirality. Like peptides, specific peptoid sequences may also give
rise to bioactivity and secondary structures.[11−14] Unlike peptides, the non-natural
backbone structure confers great resistance to proteolysis,[9,15] which greatly improves pharmacokinetics for therapeutic applications
such as antimicrobial peptoids[9,16−18] and benefits other long-term biomedical uses.[10,19] The side chain shift also eliminates backbone hydrogen-bond (H-bond)
donors, and hence intra- and interbackbone H-bonding. This also means
that the peptoid backbone may be freely hydrated[20,21] and, together with lack of backbone chirality, may exhibit great
conformational flexibility.[10,22]Peptoid self-assembly
is an emerging area.[9,10] To overcome flexible conformations
and restricted H-bonding, it might appear that a relatively high number
of residues would be required to confer sufficient attractive side
chain interactions for assembly to occur. An initial report of self-assembled
“peptoid gels” actually comprised of hybrids with peptides
that could provide H-bonding.[23] A strategy
to recover H-bonding or constrain conformations is through Ugi-multicomponent
synthesis to obtain N-substituted polyamides with amino acid side
chains,[24,25] and a derivative has been shown to form
gels from organic–water mixtures.[26] Otherwise, reported micellar assemblies have been driven by the
relatively large hydrophobic blocks of long-chain polypeptoids or
the hydrophobic alkyl “tails” of sequence-specific lipo-peptoids.[27−31] Similarly, long amphiphilic sequences (16–36 residues) are
required for the assembly of nanosheet or nanotube structures.[32−35]We report the first examples of aqueous self-assembly from
very short, water-soluble linear α-peptoid sequences without
the directing influence of other components such as peptides[36] or lipid tails.[31] Inspired by FF and derivatives, we prepared a set of four achiral
peptoid trimers comprised of analogs of the aromatic amino acidphenylalanine
and the cationic lysine. In particular, we studied the effect of varying
the sequence order as well as the side chain length of the lysine
analog. In FF peptides and derivatives, various design rules have
been reported to account for the importance of π–π
stacking of the phenyl groups, interbackbone beta-sheet packing, and
chirality.[1,2,37] Chirality
and inter- and intra-backbone H-bonding are however absent in peptoids.
Our designs therefore test the minimal requirements for nanostructure
assembly of peptoids/peptides that are directly soluble in water.Our sequences are comprised of two residues of Nphe (N-benzylglycine), the analog of phenylalanine (Phe), and a residue
of either Nlys (N-(4-aminobutyl)glycine) or Nae (N-(2-aminoethyl)glycine). Nlys is a direct lysine (Lys)
analog, while Nae is a mimic with a shorter two methylene connection
to the amine (Figure ). The sequences are named with reference to the single letter codes
of their amino acid counterparts as N(KFF), N(kFF), N(FKF), and N(FkF),
with small “k” denoting Nae. The tripeptoids were synthesized
by regular submonomer solid-phase synthesis and purified by preparative
HPLC (see the SI). The purity and identity
of the sequences were characterized by analytical HPLC and mass spectrometry
(Figures S1–S3), the standard for
solid-phase synthesized peptoids (and peptides).
Figure 1
A) Chemical structures
of tripeptoids studied. B) Schematic of sample preparation and assembly
process.
A) Chemical structures
of tripeptoids studied. B) Schematic of sample preparation and assembly
process.In this first study, all samples
were prepared by directly dissolving the sequences in deionized water
(DIW). An acidic pH (e.g., pH ∼3 at 20 mg/mL) was measured
for our assembly solutions due to small amounts of trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA) typically retained from HPLC purification. The pH is far
below the pKa of N-terminal
and side chain amines (ca. 9–10). Thus, the amines on the Nlys
and Nae side chains and the N-termini are expected
to be ionized. This amine protonation increases solubility in water
and electrostatic repulsion between the peptoids and would actually
be expected to decrease assembly propensity.Figure shows that all four tripeptoids
exhibited a similar critical aggregation concentration (CAC) in a
fluorescence assay (0.3 ± 0.03 wt %, i.e., 3 ± 0.3 mg/mL),
indicating the self-assembly of hydrophobic cores above the CAC that
could sequester the hydrophobic dye. The measured CAC is actually
comparable to those of a previously reported set of lipo-peptoids
(ca. 0.1 wt %), which however required a long palmitoyl hydrophobic
tail to drive assembly.[31]
Figure 2
Examples of CAC determination
from peptoid concentration dependence of ANS fluorescence: A) N(FkF),
B) N(FKF), C) N(KFF), and D) N(kFF). I/I0 is the intensity ratio with and without peptoids. DIW
was added directly to preweighed lyophilized peptoids to obtain the
highest concentrations shown, and the samples were diluted further
with DIW for measurements at lower concentrations. See Figure S4 for original spectra, SI 1.4 for sample preparation details, and example CAC data
with pH control.
Examples of CAC determination
from peptoid concentration dependence of ANS fluorescence: A) N(FkF),
B) N(FKF), C) N(KFF), and D) N(kFF). I/I0 is the intensity ratio with and without peptoids. DIW
was added directly to preweighed lyophilized peptoids to obtain the
highest concentrations shown, and the samples were diluted further
with DIW for measurements at lower concentrations. See Figure S4 for original spectra, SI 1.4 for sample preparation details, and example CAC data
with pH control.Analytical gradient RP-HPLC
measurements (Figure S3) further characterized
more sensitively that N(FkF) and N(FKF) partitioned more readily in
water than N(kFF) and N(KFF) (i.e., eluted at a slightly higher 76%
vs 72% water content in a water–acetonitrile (ACN) gradient).
The overall similar CAC is presumably governed by the fixed number
of hydrophobic Nphe residues and +2 charges from Nlys/Nae and the
free N-terminus. The slightly higher hydrophobicity
of N(kFF) and N(KFF) could be related to the proximity of the side
chain primary and N-terminal secondary amines hindering
double protonation.In comparison, we recently showed that an
Nphedipeptoid and FF analogue are insoluble in water. For the dipeptoid,
X-ray crystallography showed that π–π stacking
of Nphe side chains induced crystallization of microneedles during
evaporation from a DMSO–water mixture.[38] Alternatively, lamellar nanostructures were observed when the dipeptoid
was precipitated in water from an ACN solution.For the present
water-soluble tripeptoids also incorporating Nphe residues, we were
able to confirm nanostructure formation by cryo-TEM (Figure ). Remarkably, N(FkF) formed
long, uniform ca. 6 nm wide nanofibers that extended many microns,
which further collected into relatively straight bundles (Figure A–C and S5A–D). We note that the nanofibers were
formed even at the acidic pH 3 of our 2 wt % samples, when we expect
N(FkF) to be fully ionized. This behavior stands in contrast to peptide
self-assembly, which is often triggered by adjusting the pH to deionize charged groups and enhance H-bonding.[1,39]
Figure 3
Cryo-TEM
images from 2 wt % (20 mg/mL) solutions of N(FkF) (A–C), N(FKF)
(D–F), N(KFF) (G–I), and N(kFF) (J–L). The left
column shows zoomed in areas indicated in the center column. The right
column shows additional typical images. Further areas are shown in Figure S5. The insets in G show that the ∼50
nm N(KFF) features are clusters of the finest structures. Peptoid
solutions were prepared in the same way as for CAC measurements (see
the caption of Figure ). See the SI for cryo-EM sample vitrification
procedures.
Cryo-TEM
images from 2 wt % (20 mg/mL) solutions of N(FkF) (A–C), N(FKF)
(D–F), N(KFF) (G–I), and N(kFF) (J–L). The left
column shows zoomed in areas indicated in the center column. The right
column shows additional typical images. Further areas are shown in Figure S5. The insets in G show that the ∼50
nm N(KFF) features are clusters of the finest structures. Peptoid
solutions were prepared in the same way as for CAC measurements (see
the caption of Figure ). See the SI for cryo-EM sample vitrification
procedures.Cryo-TEM further showed that tripeptoid
assembly was highly sensitive to both the side chain length and the
residue sequence order. N(FKF), which has Nlys with the longer side
chain in the same central residue position as N(FkF), formed networks
(Figure D–F)
spanning a few hundred nanometers that are composed of globular assemblies
ca. 15–20 nm wide (Figure D). However, nanofibers were occasionally observed
to coexist (Figure S5H), indicating that
the propensity for ordered assembly of this N(FxF) sequence is attenuated
by the longer Nlys vs Nae side chain. It is not immediately clear
why the seemingly small difference in side chain length between N(FkF)
and N(FKF) has caused such a large shift in assembled morphology.
However, the shift is corroborated by additional light scattering
and spectroscopic evidence (see below). Moreover, it is well-known
from peptide dimers and trimers that small changes in side chains
and/or sequences can give rise to diverse assembly behavior.[1−3] It is however possible that the longer side chain of Nlys is simply
mismatched to or provides excessive conformational flexibility for
potential ordered assembly.N(kFF) and N(KFF), which have the
cationic Nae/Nlys placed at the N-terminus, also
formed interconnected assemblies (Figure G–L). Upon closer inspection, N(KFF)
actually assembled into fine 5–10 nm features (insets in Figures G and S5K) that cluster into a second set of larger
ca. 50 nm spherical assemblies. N(kFF), which has the shorter Nae
side chain, also formed 5–10 nm fine features (Figure J). However, this sequence
appeared to exhibit stronger interactions, since the fine features
instead coalesced into globules ca. 50 nm in diameter (Figures J,K and S5O,P) as well as into nanosheets that spanned >100 nm
(Figures L and S5O).Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements
corroborated the size and morphology of the nanoassemblies. N(FkF)
shows a complex scattering behavior that could be fitted with subpopulations
with hydrodynamic radii (RH) centered
around 0.5 nm and 60 nm and another population > 1000 nm with a
large dependence on a scattering angle (2θ) (Figure A). Since angular differences
are characteristic of anisotropic particles, the micron-sized dimension
should be related to the length of the nanofibers. The nonvarying
sub-1 nm fraction was assigned to monomers, while the ca. 60 nm length
scale could represent the effective averaged widths of the nanofiber
bundles.
Figure 4
Variation in hydrodynamic radii (RH)
with a DLS scattering angle (2θ = 90°) for A) N(FkF), B)
N(FKF), C) N(KFF), and D) N(kFF). Two wt % (20 mg/mL) solutions were
used. The different symbols in each panel refer simply to the different
size populations measured in each sample, as indicated by the labels
of hydrodynamic radii (RH). They are unrelated
between panels. Peptoid solutions were prepared in the same way as
for CAC measurements (see SI 1.4 for sample
preparation details).
Variation in hydrodynamic radii (RH)
with a DLS scattering angle (2θ = 90°) for A) N(FkF), B)
N(FKF), C) N(KFF), and D) N(kFF). Two wt % (20 mg/mL) solutions were
used. The different symbols in each panel refer simply to the different
size populations measured in each sample, as indicated by the labels
of hydrodynamic radii (RH). They are unrelated
between panels. Peptoid solutions were prepared in the same way as
for CAC measurements (see SI 1.4 for sample
preparation details).Peptoid N(FKF) shows
assemblies with RH centered around 108
nm (Figure B), which
could indicate the loose networks of finer assemblies (Figures D–F). N(kFF) and N(KFF)
show mainly the presence of structures with RH centered around 0.5 nm and 44–49 nm (Figures C,D), corresponding to respectively
monomers and the clusters observed.The high degree of molecular
ordering implied by the uniformity of the N(FkF) nanofibers is reminiscent
of some FF tripeptide derivatives assembling also into nanofibers.[1,37] However, our peptoids assembled directly in acidified water. Solubility
was likely promoted by the cationic Nae/Nlys side chains. Assembly
however cannot be related to beta-sheet structures because there is
no interbackbone H-bonding in peptoids. We speculate that, similar
to the Nphedipeptoid crystals we reported recently,[38] nanofiber assembly was facilitated by Nphe π–π
stacking as well as by flexible peptoid backbone twists that enable
favorable positioning of interacting groups.[38,40]We further characterized π–π stacking spectroscopically
(Figure ). First,
N(FkF) showed a set of absorption fine structures in the 245–270
nm phenyl band distinct from other sequences as well as an additional
absorption around 288 nm (Figure A), indicating a unique phenyl environment. This phenyl
signature was retained at concentrations below the CAC (Figure S6A), indicating that they originate from
the monomer state. On the other hand, while other tripeptoids produced
fluorescence emissions at 282 and 288 nm, N(FkF) displayed a pair
of especially well-separated emissions centered at 280 and 312 nm
(Figure B). These
peaks, separated by 32 nm (3663 cm–1), are assigned
as monomer and strongly red-shifted excimer emission, respectively.
An excimer was assigned based on its increasing emission with increasing
concentration above the CAC (Figure S6).
As the nanofibers assembled, the phenyl groups must be sufficiently
close in space to form the excimer efficiently during the excited-state
lifetime of the phenyl chromophore. This is analogous to the fluorescence
behavior of FF peptide nanofibers[37] and
certain dimerized peptoids that are mediated by π-interactions.[40,41]
Figure 5
A)
Absorbance spectra of tripeptoids in water (2 wt %, 20 mg/mL; intensities
normalized to local minimum at 243 nm). B) Fluorescence spectra of
the same solutions (265 nm excitation; normalized to emission maxima).
Peptoid solutions were prepared in the same way as for CAC measurements
(see the caption of Figure and SI 1.4 for details).
A)
Absorbance spectra of tripeptoids in water (2 wt %, 20 mg/mL; intensities
normalized to local minimum at 243 nm). B) Fluorescence spectra of
the same solutions (265 nm excitation; normalized to emission maxima).
Peptoid solutions were prepared in the same way as for CAC measurements
(see the caption of Figure and SI 1.4 for details).The excimer fluorescence features were already
present 30 min after initially dissolving the peptoid in water, the
time sample preparation and measurements took. They also held constant
after long-term storage (tested up to 4 months at 4 °C; see Figure S7). Consistent with the CAC measured
for N(FkF) (∼3 mg/mL; Figure ), the 312 nm excimer peak grew more apparent as the
peptoid concentration increased above 1 mg/mL (Figure S6).In the context of sequence-specific assembly
facilitated by Nphe π–π stacking, it is noteworthy
that the less hydrophobic N(FxF) compared to N(xFF) (earlier elution
in HPLC—Figure S1), which ordinarily
would suggest lower assembly propensity, was actually able to form
the more ordered nanofibers. Indeed, as discussed above, the sequences
are expected to be fully charged to promote solubility. It is possible
that stronger nonspecific attractive interactions due to higher hydrophobicities
could be hindering the repositioning required during assembly to obtain
ordered nanostructures. Interestingly, the 312 nm excimer emission
remained when we raised the pH of the N(FkF) solution from pH 3 to
pH 11 (Figure S8), indicating that the
N(FkF) structural interactions were not controlled by charge or H-bonding.
In comparison, the small separation of the 282 nm/288 nm peaks for
N(FKF) is also unchanged from acidic to basic pH (Figure S9), although there is some slight overall shift of
these peaks and some additional low intensity features appeared by
pH 9. This lower pH stability could be due to the fact that the unordered
N(FKF) structure may possibly be more susceptible to changes in environmental
conditions.In summary, we have identified a set of minimally
short, water-soluble tripeptoids that assemble into uniform 6 nm wide
nanofibers and other nanoassemblies. This is the first demonstration
of self-assembly for such short linear α-peptoids. The assembled
morphology depended on the sequence and was further controlled by
the cationic side chain length. Spectroscopic results are consistent
with unique π–π interactions that differentiate
highly ordered nanofibers from other structures.Our tripeptoids
illustrate that ordered aqueous assembly of even very short peptidic
chains can still be engineered without chirality, backbone–backbone
H-bonding (e.g., beta-sheet structures[2,37]), and charge
group deionization. Even if our tripeptoids may superficially resemble
FF-peptides, peptoids and peptides appear to follow different assembly
rules to strike a balance between solvation and intermolecular attraction.
The flexibility of the peptoid backbone might even aid assembly, by
accommodating favorable conformations for side chain H-bonding or
π–π stacking, as previously implicated.[38,40] Nae, the Lys-mimic included in our nanofiber- and sheet-forming
tripeptoids, is also found in longer peptoid sequences that assemble
into highly ordered bilayer nanosheets,[32,34] suggesting
a potential structural role. Future studies comprising additional
nano characterization, molecular simulations, and a larger set of
sequences may elucidate the molecular structures observed and clarify
how the sequence and the Nae side chain may control the assembly.
Overall, our tri-peptoid sequences display unique and novel self-assembly
behavior distinct from di- and tripeptides and open the door to convenient
studies of peptoid assembly directly in water. The proteolytically
stable peptidic structures should be of fundamental interest as well
as of value to applications such as stable biomaterials and other
sequence-tunable nanostructures.
Authors: King Hang Aaron Lau; Valeria Castelletto; Thomas Kendall; Jan Sefcik; Ian W Hamley; Mehedi Reza; Janne Ruokolainen Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Ellen J Robertson; Alessia Battigelli; Caroline Proulx; Ranjan V Mannige; Thomas K Haxton; Lisa Yun; Stephen Whitelam; Ronald N Zuckermann Journal: Acc Chem Res Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 22.384
Authors: Christian J Jimenez; Jiacheng Tan; Kalli M Dowell; Gillian E Gadbois; Cameron A Read; Nicole Burgess; Jesus E Cervantes; Shannon Chan; Anmol Jandaur; Tara Karanik; Jaenic J Lee; Mikaela C Ley; Molly McGeehan; Ann McMonigal; Kira L Palazzo; Samantha A Parker; Andre Payman; Maritza Soria; Lauren Verheyden; Vivian T Vo; Jennifer Yin; Anna L Calkins; Amelia A Fuller; Grace Y Stokes Journal: Biopolymers Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 2.505
Authors: Ann M Czyzewski; Håvard Jenssen; Christopher D Fjell; Matt Waldbrook; Nathaniel P Chongsiriwatana; Eddie Yuen; Robert E W Hancock; Annelise E Barron Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Josefine Eilsø Nielsen; Morgan Ashley Alford; Deborah Bow Yue Yung; Natalia Molchanova; John A Fortkort; Jennifer S Lin; Gill Diamond; Robert E W Hancock; Håvard Jenssen; Daniel Pletzer; Reidar Lund; Annelise E Barron Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 5.084