Literature DB >> 19474683

The influence of the number of retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer undergoing tumor-specific mesorectal excision.

Young-Wan Kim1, Nam-Kyu Kim, Byung-Soh Min, Kang-Young Lee, Seung-Kook Sohn, Chang-Hwan Cho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine whether the number of lymph nodes retrieved influence staging and survival in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer that undergo tumor-specific mesorectal excision. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The prognostic impact of the retrieved nodes has been emphasized in patients with colorectal cancer, but few studies have focused on patients with rectal cancer.
METHODS: A total of 900 patients who underwent tumor-specific mesorectal excision with curative intent and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy for stage II and III rectal cancer from January 1989 to December 2006 were analyzed.
RESULTS: Cancer-specific survival (CSS) of stage II patients with less than 15 nodes (25th percentile) was not different from stage III patients, but CSS was better in stage II patients with more than 15 nodes. When using cutoff values of the 25th and 50th percentiles (22 and 31 nodes), recurrence-free survival (RFS) was statistically different among subgroups of stage II and III patients. In multivariate analysis, stage II disease with less than 15 nodes retrieved was an adverse factor for CSS and RFS. In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, using cutoff values, the difference for CSS was not significant with 22 and more nodes and the difference for RFS was not observed with 23 and more nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of lymph nodes retrieved is closely associated with survival and recurrence in patients with stage II rectal cancer and, for more accurate prognostic stratification, at least 22 and 23 nodes seem to be necessary, respectively, for CSS and for RFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19474683     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a6cc25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  29 in total

1.  Number of lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: How many are needed?

Authors:  Stefano Scabini; Valter Ferrando
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-02-27

2.  Effect of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing on lymph node harvest in T1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Heae Surng Park; Im-kyung Kim; Younghae Song; Seung Hyuk Baik; Seung-Kook Sohn; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients: Implications for staging and adjuvant treatment strategies.

Authors:  J Brabender; E Bollschweiler; A H Hölscher; K Strobel; C Gutschow; K Prenzel; P Grimminger; U Drebber; W Schröder; R Metzger; D Vallböhmer
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  [Tumors of the lower gastrointestinal tract : Indication and extent of lymph node dissection].

Authors:  S Merkel; K Weber; A Perrakis; J Göhl; W Hohenberger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Association of certification, improved quality and better oncological outcomes for rectal cancer in a specialized colorectal unit.

Authors:  Annika Jacob; Wolfgang Albert; Thomas Jackisch; Christiane Jakob; Anja Sims; Helmut Witzigmann; Sören Torge Mees; Sigmar Stelzner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Downstaged ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy may not need adjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yu-Tso Liao; Yu-Lin Lin; John Huang; Ji-Shiang Hung; Been-Ren Lin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Prognostic implications of the number of retrieved lymph nodes of patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Chang Sik Yu; Seok-Byung Lim; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Tae Won Kim; Jong Hoon Kim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Stage II colon cancer staging using the number of retrieved lymph nodes may be superior to current TNM staging for prognosis stratification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shimpei Ogawa; Michio Itabashi; Yoshiko Bamba; Kimitaka Tani; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Shinichi Yamauchi; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Stage II/III rectal cancer with intermediate response to preoperative radiochemotherapy: do we have indications for individual risk stratification?

Authors:  Thilo Sprenger; Hilka Rothe; Klaus Jung; Hans Christiansen; Lena C Conradi; B Michael Ghadimi; Heinz Becker; Torsten Liersch
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy does not necessarily reduce lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer specimens--results from a prospective evaluation with extensive pathological work-up.

Authors:  Thilo Sprenger; Hilka Rothe; Kia Homayounfar; Tim Beissbarth; B Michael Ghadimi; Heinz Becker; Torsten Liersch
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.