| Literature DB >> 32336319 |
Bokyeong Ryu1, Seong Woo Choi2, Seul-Gi Lee2, Young-Hoon Jeong2, Ukjin Kim1, Jin Kim1, Cho-Rok Jung3, Hyung-Min Chung2, Jae-Hak Park1, C-Yoon Kim2.
Abstract
In accordance with requirements of the ICH S7B safety pharmacology guidelines, numerous next-generation cardiotoxicity studies using human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (CMs) are being conducted globally. Although several stem cell-derived CMs are being developed for commercialization, there is insufficient research to verify if these CMs can replace animal experiments. In this study, in vitro high-efficiency CMs derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESC-CMs) were compared with Sprague-Dawley rats as in vivo experimental animals, and primary cultured in vitro rat-CMs for cardiotoxicity tests. In vivo rats were administrated with two consecutive injections of 100 mg/kg isoproterenol, 15 mg/kg doxorubicin, or 100 mg/kg nifedipine, while in vitro rat-CMs and hESC-CMs were treated with 5 μM isoproterenol, 5 μM doxorubicin, and 50 μM nifedipine. We have verified the equivalence of hESC-CMs assessments over various molecular biological markers, morphological analysis. Also, we have identified the advantages of hESC-CMs, which can distinguish between species variability, over electrophysiological analysis of ion channels against cardiac damage. Our findings demonstrate the possibility and advantage of high-efficiency hESC-CMs as next-generation cardiotoxicity assessment. [BMB Reports 2020; 53(8): 437-441].Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32336319 PMCID: PMC7473479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMB Rep ISSN: 1976-6696 Impact factor: 4.778
Fig. 1Overview of the hESC-CM differentiation. (A) The hESC-CM differentiation protocol using small-molecules. (B) At differentiation day 30, the cells were stained with cTnT and α-actinin-2. Scale bars: 100 µm. (C) And at day 30, the purity was monitored by the flow cytometry and showed as upper 80%.
Fig. 2Morphological changes in three models with cardiotoxicants. (A) The rat hearts showed damaged cardiac myocyte architectures (arrows), and characteristics of apoptotic cell death showed in the cells (arrowheads). Scale bars: 50 µm. (B) All of samples were stained with α-actinin-2 (green) and DAPI (blue). The arrows and arrow-heads indicate α-actinin-2 deterioration. Scale bars: 100 µm. (C-E) The apoptosis indices of rats (C), rat-CMs (D), and hESC-CMs (E) were assessed with the TUNEL. Data shown are mean ± SD (***P < 0.001; n = 5).
Fig. 3mRNA expression and electrophysiology in three models with cardiotoxicants. (A) The relative expression of iNOS, Hmox1, Sod1, Gpx1, β-MHC, ANP, BNP, Spp1, IL-1β, IL-6, TLR2, TLR4, TNF-α, ratio of Bax/Bcl-2, Casp9, p53 were monitored. Data shown are mean ± SEM (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; n = 5). (B-D) The heat-maps in which the entire set of genes were clus-tered hierarchically to visualize general expression patterns with isoproterenol (B), doxorubicin (C), or nifedipine (D). The profiles are represented by models (columns) and genes (rows). The color scale at the top represents relative expression level, wherein yellow and blue colors indicate upregulated and unaltered expression, respectively (See Supplementary Table 1). (E) The ECG and patch clamp were recorded (see Table 1).
Electrophysiological changes in three models with cardiotoxicants
| Ctrl | ISO | DOX | NIF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECG results from rats | ||||
| HR (bpm) | 287±2 | 452±17 | 271±16 | 224±22 |
| QT (msec) | 87.76±12.92 | 91.84±0.52 | 130.61±10.43 | 65.31±7.78 |
| QTcB (msec) | 191.87±28.24 | 252.11±1.41 | 277.52±22.16 | 126.06±15.01 |
| QTcF (msec) | 147.83±21.76 | 180.06±1.01 | 215.87±17.24 | 101.25±12.05 |
| QRlc (msec) | 209.54±12.92 | 225.40±0.51 | 250.50±10.43 | 177.98±7.78 |
| Patch clamp results from rat-CMs | ||||
| HR (bpm) | 117±9 | 142±13 | 114±10 | 38±10 |
| APD50 (msec) | 64.6±5.2 | 78.4±6.4 | 65.1±4.9 | 47.2±4.5 |
| Patch clamp results from hESC-CMs | ||||
| HR (bpm) | 83±12 | 107±9 | 87±7 | 64±8 |
| APD50 (msec) | 295.0±30.9 | 217.0±22.1 | 291.0±21.4 | 157.0±38.0 |
Data shown are mean ± SD (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n = 5). See Fig. 3E.