Literature DB >> 25675366

Stem cell-derived systems in toxicology assessment.

Laura Suter-Dick1, Paula M Alves2,3, Bas J Blaauboer4, Klaus-Dieter Bremm5, Catarina Brito2,3, Sandra Coecke6, Burkhard Flick7, Paul Fowler, Jürgen Hescheler8, Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg9, Paul Jennings10, Jens M Kelm11, Irene Manou12, Pratibha Mistry13, Angelo Moretto14,15, Adrian Roth16, Donald Stedman17, Bob van de Water18, Mario Beilmann.   

Abstract

Industrial sectors perform toxicological assessments of their potential products to ensure human safety and to fulfill regulatory requirements. These assessments often involve animal testing, but ethical, cost, and time concerns, together with a ban on it in specific sectors, make appropriate in vitro systems indispensable in toxicology. In this study, we summarize the outcome of an EPAA (European Partnership of Alternatives to Animal Testing)-organized workshop on the use of stem cell-derived (SCD) systems in toxicology, with a focus on industrial applications. SCD systems, in particular, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived, provide physiological cell culture systems of easy access and amenable to a variety of assays. They also present the opportunity to apply the vast repository of existing nonclinical data for the understanding of in vitro to in vivo translation. SCD systems from several toxicologically relevant tissues exist; they generally recapitulate many aspects of physiology and respond to toxicological and pharmacological interventions. However, focused research is necessary to accelerate implementation of SCD systems in an industrial setting and subsequent use of such systems by regulatory authorities. Research is required into the phenotypic characterization of the systems, since methods and protocols for generating terminally differentiated SCD cells are still lacking. Organotypical 3D culture systems in bioreactors and microscale tissue engineering technologies should be fostered, as they promote and maintain differentiation and support coculture systems. They need further development and validation for their successful implementation in toxicity testing in industry. Analytical measures also need to be implemented to enable compound exposure and metabolism measurements for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation. The future of SCD toxicological tests will combine advanced cell culture technologies and biokinetic measurements to support regulatory and research applications. However, scientific and technical hurdles must be overcome before SCD in vitro methods undergo appropriate validation and become accepted in the regulatory arena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25675366     DOI: 10.1089/scd.2014.0540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  12 in total

1.  21st Century Cell Culture for 21st Century Toxicology.

Authors:  David Pamies; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  In vitro cardiotoxicity assessment of environmental chemicals using an organotypic human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived model.

Authors:  Oksana Sirenko; Fabian A Grimm; Kristen R Ryan; Yasuhiro Iwata; Weihsueh A Chiu; Frederick Parham; Jessica A Wignall; Blake Anson; Evan F Cromwell; Mamta Behl; Ivan Rusyn; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Functional and Mechanistic Neurotoxicity Profiling Using Human iPSC-Derived Neural 3D Cultures.

Authors:  Oksana Sirenko; Frederick Parham; Steven Dea; Neha Sodhi; Steven Biesmans; Sergio Mora-Castilla; Kristen Ryan; Mamta Behl; Grischa Chandy; Carole Crittenden; Sarah Vargas-Hurlston; Oivin Guicherit; Ryan Gordon; Fabian Zanella; Cassiano Carromeu
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Generation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using Endothelial Progenitor Cells Derived from Umbilical Cord Blood and Adult Peripheral Blood.

Authors:  Xiugong Gao; Jeffrey J Yourick; Robert L Sprando
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Effects of Co-Culture Media on Hepatic Differentiation of hiPSC with or without HUVEC Co-Culture.

Authors:  Nora Freyer; Selina Greuel; Fanny Knöspel; Nadja Strahl; Leila Amini; Frank Jacobs; Mario Monshouwer; Katrin Zeilinger
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  3S - Systematic, systemic, and systems biology and toxicology.

Authors:  Lena Smirnova; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Raffaella Corvi; Andre Levchenko; Suzanne C Fitzpatrick; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 6.043

7.  Ab initio chemical safety assessment: A workflow based on exposure considerations and non-animal methods.

Authors:  Elisabet Berggren; Andrew White; Gladys Ouedraogo; Alicia Paini; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Frederic Y Bois; Thomas Exner; Sofia Leite; Leo A van Grunsven; Andrew Worth; Catherine Mahony
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2017-11

8.  The European General Data Protection Regulation: challenges and considerations for iPSC researchers and biobanks.

Authors:  Michael Morrison; Jessica Bell; Carol George; Shawn Harmon; Megan Munsie; Jane Kaye
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.806

9.  Development and evaluation of next-generation cardiotoxicity assay based on embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Bokyeong Ryu; Seong Woo Choi; Seul-Gi Lee; Young-Hoon Jeong; Ukjin Kim; Jin Kim; Cho-Rok Jung; Hyung-Min Chung; Jae-Hak Park; C-Yoon Kim
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.778

10.  A human population-based organotypic in vitro model for cardiotoxicity screening.

Authors:  Fabian A Grimm; Alexander Blanchette; John S House; Kyle Ferguson; Nan-Hung Hsieh; Chimeddulam Dalaijamts; Alec A Wright; Blake Anson; Fred A Wright; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 6.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.