Literature DB >> 32335264

Mapping functional brain networks from the structural connectome: Relating the series expansion and eigenmode approaches.

Prejaas Tewarie1, Bastian Prasse2, Jil M Meier3, Fernando A N Santos4, Linda Douw4, Menno M Schoonheim4, Cornelis J Stam5, Piet Van Mieghem3, Arjan Hillebrand5.   

Abstract

Functional brain networks are shaped and constrained by the underlying structural network. However, functional networks are not merely a one-to-one reflection of the structural network. Several theories have been put forward to understand the relationship between structural and functional networks. However, it remains unclear how these theories can be unified. Two existing recent theories state that 1) functional networks can be explained by all possible walks in the structural network, which we will refer to as the series expansion approach, and 2) functional networks can be explained by a weighted combination of the eigenmodes of the structural network, the so-called eigenmode approach. To elucidate the unique or common explanatory power of these approaches to estimate functional networks from the structural network, we analysed the relationship between these two existing views. Using linear algebra, we first show that the eigenmode approach can be written in terms of the series expansion approach, i.e., walks on the structural network associated with different hop counts correspond to different weightings of the eigenvectors of this network. Second, we provide explicit expressions for the coefficients for both the eigenmode and series expansion approach. These theoretical results were verified by empirical data from Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), demonstrating a strong correlation between the mappings based on both approaches. Third, we analytically and empirically demonstrate that the fit of the eigenmode approach to measured functional data is always at least as good as the fit of the series expansion approach, and that errors in the structural data lead to large errors of the estimated coefficients for the series expansion approach. Therefore, we argue that the eigenmode approach should be preferred over the series expansion approach. Results hold for eigenmodes of the weighted adjacency matrices as well as eigenmodes of the graph Laplacian. ​Taken together, these results provide an important step towards unification of existing theories regarding the structure-function relationships in brain networks.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); Functional MRI (fMRI); Functional network; Neural mass; Simultaneous diagonalisation; Structural connectome; Structural network

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335264     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

Review 1.  Graph Models of Pathology Spread in Alzheimer's Disease: An Alternative to Conventional Graph Theoretic Analysis.

Authors:  Ashish Raj
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2021-05-25

2.  Graph neural fields: A framework for spatiotemporal dynamical models on the human connectome.

Authors:  Marco Aqil; Selen Atasoy; Morten L Kringelbach; Rikkert Hindriks
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Damage to the structural connectome reflected in resting-state fMRI functional connectivity.

Authors:  Anirudh Wodeyar; Jessica M Cassidy; Steven C Cramer; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 4.  Biomarkers for autism spectrum disorder: opportunities for magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Timothy P L Roberts; Emily S Kuschner; J Christopher Edgar
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 5.  Computational Models in Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Katharina Glomb; Joana Cabral; Anna Cattani; Alberto Mazzoni; Ashish Raj; Benedetta Franceschiello
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Predicting Functional Connectivity From Observed and Latent Structural Connectivity via Eigenvalue Mapping.

Authors:  Jennifer A Cummings; Benjamin Sipes; Daniel H Mathalon; Ashish Raj
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Predicting time-resolved electrophysiological brain networks from structural eigenmodes.

Authors:  Prejaas Tewarie; Bastian Prasse; Jil Meier; Kanad Mandke; Shaun Warrington; Cornelis J Stam; Matthew J Brookes; Piet Van Mieghem; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Arjan Hillebrand
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.399

8.  Structure-informed functional connectivity driven by identifiable and state-specific control regions.

Authors:  Benjamin Chiêm; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Jean-Charles Delvenne
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-21

9.  Predicting MEG resting-state functional connectivity from microstructural information.

Authors:  Eirini Messaritaki; Sonya Foley; Simona Schiavi; Lorenzo Magazzini; Bethany Routley; Derek K Jones; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  Determination of Dynamic Brain Connectivity via Spectral Analysis.

Authors:  Peter A Robinson; James A Henderson; Natasha C Gabay; Kevin M Aquino; Tara Babaie-Janvier; Xiao Gao
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.