Literature DB >> 32335207

New ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity: Report from an EPAA Blue Sky Workshop.

Catherine Mahony1, Randolph S Ashton2, Barbara Birk3, Alan R Boobis4, Tom Cull5, George P Daston6, Lorna Ewart7, Thomas B Knudsen8, Irene Manou9, Sebastian Maurer-Stroh10, Luigi Margiotta-Casaluci11, Boris P Müller12, Pär Nordlund13, Ruth A Roberts14, Thomas Steger-Hartmann15, Evita Vandenbossche16, Mark R Viant17, Mathieu Vinken18, Maurice Whelan19, Zvonar Zvonimir20, Mark T D Cronin21.   

Abstract

The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) convened a 'Blue Sky Workshop' on new ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity. The aim of the Workshop was to formulate strategic ideas to improve and increase the applicability, implementation and acceptance of modern non-animal methods to determine systemic toxicity. The Workshop concluded that good progress is being made to assess repeated dose toxicity without animals taking advantage of existing knowledge in toxicology, thresholds of toxicological concern, adverse outcome pathways and read-across workflows. These approaches can be supported by New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) utilising modern molecular technologies and computational methods. Recommendations from the Workshop were based around the needs for better chemical safety assessment: how to strengthen the evidence base for decision making; to develop, standardise and harmonise NAMs for human toxicity; and the improvement in the applicability and acceptance of novel techniques. "Disruptive thinking" is required to reconsider chemical legislation, validation of NAMs and the opportunities to move away from reliance on animal tests. Case study practices and data sharing, ensuring reproducibility of NAMs, were viewed as crucial to the improvement of non-animal test approaches for systemic toxicity.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternatives; Chemical legislation; Read-across; Repeated dose toxicity testing; Safety assessment; ab initio; in silico; in vitro

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335207     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  8 in total

1.  In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: current status and future needs in predicting liver toxicity.

Authors:  Arianna Bassan; Vinicius M Alves; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Andreas Bender; Mark T D Cronin; Kevin P Cross; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Nigel Greene; Raymond Kemper; Marlene T Kim; Moiz Mumtaz; Tobias Noeske; Manuela Pavan; Julia Pletz; Daniel P Russo; Yogesh Sabnis; Markus Schaefer; David T Szabo; Jean-Pierre Valentin; Joerg Wichard; Dominic Williams; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-09

Review 2.  FutureTox IV Workshop Summary: Predictive Toxicology for Healthy Children.

Authors:  Thomas B Knudsen; Suzanne Compton Fitzpatrick; K Nadira De Abrew; Linda S Birnbaum; Anne Chappelle; George P Daston; Dana C Dolinoy; Alison Elder; Susan Euling; Elaine M Faustman; Kristi Pullen Fedinick; Jill A Franzosa; Derik E Haggard; Laurie Haws; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Germaine M Buck Louis; Donna L Mendrick; Ruthann Rudel; Katerine S Saili; Thaddeus T Schug; Robyn L Tanguay; Alexandra E Turley; Barbara A Wetmore; Kimberly W White; Todd J Zurlinden
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The use of Bayesian methodology in the development and validation of a tiered assessment approach towards prediction of rat acute oral toxicity.

Authors:  James W Firman; Mark T D Cronin; Philip H Rowe; Elizaveta Semenova; John E Doe
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 4.  Studying metabolism with multi-organ chips: new tools for disease modelling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Tanvi Shroff; Kehinde Aina; Christian Maass; Madalena Cipriano; Joeri Lambrecht; Frank Tacke; Alexander Mosig; Peter Loskill
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 6.411

Review 5.  A matter of trust: Learning lessons about causality will make qAOPs credible.

Authors:  Nicoleta Spînu; Mark T D Cronin; Judith C Madden; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-02

6.  Probabilistic modelling of developmental neurotoxicity based on a simplified adverse outcome pathway network.

Authors:  Nicoleta Spînu; Mark T D Cronin; Junpeng Lao; Anna Bal-Price; Ivana Campia; Steven J Enoch; Judith C Madden; Liadys Mora Lagares; Marjana Novič; David Pamies; Stefan Scholz; Daniel L Villeneuve; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-02

7.  Subchronic toxicity and genotoxicity studies of Hericium erinaceus β-glucan extract preparation.

Authors:  S N Chen; C S Chang; M F Yang; S Chen; M Soni; B Mahadevan
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-11

8.  A framework for chemical safety assessment incorporating new approach methodologies within REACH.

Authors:  Nicholas Ball; Remi Bars; Philip A Botham; Andreea Cuciureanu; Mark T D Cronin; John E Doe; Tatsiana Dudzina; Timothy W Gant; Marcel Leist; Bennard van Ravenzwaay
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.