Literature DB >> 3233474

Physiological changes after postanal repair and parameters predicting outcome.

K Yoshioka1, G Hyland, M R Keighley.   

Abstract

Nineteen patients have been studied before and 3 months after postanal repair. Physiological parameters have been compared with 16 age- and sex-matched controls. Twelve patients were substantially improved whereas seven obtained no clinical benefit. Pre-operative resting (P less than 0.005), squeeze (P less than 0.005) and strain (P less than 0.005) anal pressures at 2 cm were significantly less than controls. Similarly, pressures during all three events at 4 cm were significantly less than controls (resting P less than 0.05, squeeze P less than 0.005, strain P less than 0.025). Median volume of first leak during saline infusion was significantly less than controls (P less than 0.005) as was the total tolerable volume (P less than 0.005). Videoproctographic parameters which differed significantly from controls included pelvic floor descent at rest (P less than 0.005), during contraction (P less than 0.005) and straining (P less than 0.05); resting and squeeze perineal descent (P less than 0.005); and anal canal length at rest and straining (P less than 0.005). Anorectal angles, rectal compliance, rectal sensation and emptying did not differ from controls. None of these parameters was improved by postanal repair. Patients not improved by operation could be detected pre-operatively by low resting (P less than 0.05), squeeze (P less than 0.025) and strain (P less than 0.05) anal pressure at 2 cm as well as by videoproctographic evidence of increased pelvic floor descent at rest (P less than 0.01), during contraction (P less than 0.005) and straining (P less than 0.005), excessive perineal descent at rest (P less than 0.05), during contraction (P less than 0.05) and during attempted defaecation (P less than 0.05) and a short anal canal at rest (P less than 0.05) and during straining (P less than 0.025).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3233474     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800751225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  6 in total

1.  A technique for the dynamic assessment of anal sphincter function.

Authors:  O O Rasmussen; H Colstrup; G Lose; J Christiansen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Fecal incontinence: a review.

Authors:  Nicolas Bellicini; Peter J Molloy; Phillip Caushaj; Pamelasue Kozlowski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The effect of age on pelvic floor dynamics.

Authors:  M Pinho; K Yoshioka; J Ortiz; M Oya; M R Keighley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Defecographic assessment after colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  M Kusunoki; T Okamoto; H Yoshikawa; H Yanagi; Y Shoji; T Yamamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Fecal incontinence: indications for repairing the anal sphincter.

Authors:  F Penninckx
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The position of the patient does not adversely influence the results of the most clinically important measurements of anorectal function.

Authors:  K Yoshioka; M R Keighley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.