| Literature DB >> 32333081 |
Lujun Shen1,2, Han Qi1,2, Shuanggang Chen1,2, Fei Cao1,2, Lin Xie1,2, Ying Wu1,2, Weimei Ma1,2, Ze Song3, Hui Yuan1,2, Tao Zhang4, Dandan Li2,5, Xizhi Wen2,5, Qifeng Chen1,2, Wang Li1,2, Xiaoshi Zhang6,7, Weijun Fan8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presence of liver metastasis correlates with poor therapeutic response of PD-1 blockade therapy in melanoma. A novel treatment protocol by combining cryoablation with transarterial infusion of pembrolizumab (CATAP) was proposed, and its feasibility and safety was assessed among this group of patients.Entities:
Keywords: Cryoablation; Liver metastasis; Melanoma; Pembrolizumab; Proof-of-concept
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32333081 PMCID: PMC7413875 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02566-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother ISSN: 0340-7004 Impact factor: 6.968
Fig. 1Rationale and schematic design of the combined CATAP treatment. The cryoablation of target tumor releases neoantigens and Th1 cytokines in local tumor microenvironment, facilitating the activation of T cells and NK cells; meanwhile, PD-1 blockade using pembrolizumab inhibit the PD-L1/PD1 ligation induced energy of immune cells (a). Schematic charts explaining the process of transarterial infusion of pembrolizumab (b) and the sequencing of the planned combination treatment (c)
Patient baseline characteristics
| Category | Whole Cohort |
|---|---|
| Age, median (range) | 53 (32–76) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 8 (53.3) |
| Female | 7 (46.7) |
| Tumor origin | |
| Cutaneous | 9 (60.0) |
| Uveal | 6 (40.0) |
| ECOG | |
| 0 | 13 (86.7) |
| 1 | 2 (13.3) |
| LDH level | |
| Normal | 6 (40.0) |
| Elevated | 9 (60.0) |
| Metastatic onset | |
| Synchronous | 2 (13.3) |
| Metachronous | 13 (86.7) |
| Number of intrahepatic metastasis | |
| 4–20 | 6 (40.0) |
| > 20 | 9 (60.0) |
| Intrahepatic tumor size (cm) | |
| < 5 | 10 (66.7) |
| ≥ 5 | 5 (33.3) |
| Extrahepatic metastasis | |
| Absent | 2 (13.3) |
| Present | 13 (86.7) |
| Location of extrahepatic metastasis | |
| Lung | 7 (46.7) |
| Bone | 8 (53.3) |
| Subcutaneous | 4 (26.7) |
| Othera | 4 (26.7) |
| Number of metastatic sites | |
| 1 | 2 (13.3) |
| 2 | 6 (40.0) |
| 3 | 4 (26.7) |
| > 3 | 3 (20.0) |
| Previous treatments | |
| Pembrolizumab i.v | 6 (40.0) |
| Chemotherapy | 3 (20.0) |
| Targeted therapy | 4 (26.7) |
| Embolization-based therapy | 2 (13.3) |
| Other therapy | 5 (33.3) |
aOther locations includes pancreas, spleen, kidney, brain and retroperitoneal lymph nodes
Adverse events considered to be drug related by investigators (CTCAE v.5.0)
| Adverse events | Grade 1 ( | Grade 2 ( | Grade 3/4 ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any | 9 (60.0) | 3 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Fatigue | 7 (46.7) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Pyrexia | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Arthralgia | 4 (26.7) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Myalgia | 1 (6.7) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Headache | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Pruritus | 3 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Rash | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Nausea | 5 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Vitiligo | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Diarrhea | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Hypothyroidism | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Adrenal insufficiency | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Elevated Alanine Aminotransferase | 1 (6.7) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) |
CATAP treatment and treatment response in enrolled cohort
| Patient number | Gender | Age | Tumor origin | Pembro i.v. before | Number of intrahepatic lesions | Diameter (mm) | Extrahepatic metastasis | Cycles in combined stage | Reason for discontinuity in combined stagea | Cycles in infusion stage | Reason for discontinuity in infusion stagea | Best treatment Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 62 | Cutaneous | No | > 20 | 24 | Present | 3 | Self | 2 | Self | Partial response |
| 2 | Male | 43 | Uveal | No | > 20 | 21 | Present | 1 | disease progression | 0 | Disease progression | Progression |
| 3 | Male | 53 | Cutaneous | No | > 20 | 42 | Present | 3 | Disease progression | 1 | Disease progression | Progression |
| 4 | Male | 76 | Cutaneous | No | 4–20 | 55 | Present | 2 | Self | 0 | Self | Stable disease |
| 5 | Female | 43 | Uveal | No | > 20 | 30 | Present | 3 | Self | 6 | Self | Partial response |
| 6 | Female | 68 | Uveal | No | 4–20 | 13 | Absent | 2 | Disease progression | 2 | Disease progression | Progression |
| 7 | Female | 32 | Cutaneous | Yes | > 20 | 60 | Present | 2 | Self | 0 | Self | Stable disease |
| 8 | Male | 34 | Cutaneous | Yes | 4–20 | 13 | Present | 2 | Self | 2 | Self | Partial response |
| 9 | Female | 57 | Uveal | No | 4–20 | 52 | Present | 4 | – | 3 | Disease progression | Stable disease |
| 10 | Female | 55 | Uveal | No | 4–20 | 65 | Absent | 3 | High PS score | 2 | Disease progression | Progression |
| 11 | Male | 53 | Cutaneous | Yes | 4–20 | 32 | Present | 2 | Disease progression | 1 | Disease progression | Progression |
| 12 | Female | 53 | Uveal | No | > 20 | 60 | Present | 1 | High PS score | 0 | High PS score | Progression |
| 13 | Male | 54 | Cutaneous | Yes | > 20 | 17 | Present | 2 | Disease progression | 0 | Disease progression | Progression |
| 14 | Male | 33 | Cutaneous | Yes | > 20 | 30 | Present | 1 | Self | 1 | Disease progression | Progression |
| 15 | Male | 56 | Cutaneous | Yes | > 20 | 27 | Present | 2 | Self | 8 | CR achieved | Complete response |
aSelf refers to discontinuity of treatment based on patients’ requests
Fig. 2Example of a patient with complete response. (a) A 56-year old male with melanoma in left big toe and inguinal lymph nodes metastases underwent surgical resection and adjuvant i.v. pembrolizumab therapy. Multiple liver metastases, bony metastases and pancreatic metastases were identified after two cycles of i.v. pembrolizumab; the disease progressed after additional two cycles of i.v. pembrolizumab treatment. Seeking for novel treatment options, the patient agreed to receive the CATAP treatment. A major PR was observed after two cycles of combination treatment; CR was achieved after two more cycles of i.a. infusion of pembrolizumab. (b) The change of serum LDH level during the treatment. (c) Capillary hyperplasia on the chest after i.v. pembrolizumab turn for the better after the combined CATAP treatment
Best treatment response assessed by RECIST 1.1
| Categories | CR ( | PR ( | SD ( | PD ( | ORR ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Cohort | 1 (6.7) | 3 (20.0) | 3 (20.0) | 8 (53.3) | 4 (26.7) | |
| Tumor origin | 0.462 | |||||
| Cutaneous origin | 1 (11.1) | 2 (22.2) | 2 (22.2) | 4 (44.4) | 3 (33.3) | |
| Uveal origin | 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | 4 (66.7) | 1 (16.7) | |
| Intrahepatic tumor size (cm) | 0.154 | |||||
| < 5 | 1 (10.0) | 3 (30.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (60.0) | 4 (40.0) | |
| ≥ 5 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (60.0) | 2 (40.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Previous Pembrolizumab i.v | 0.538 | |||||
| No | 0 (0.0) | 2 (22.2) | 2 (22.2) | 5 (55.6) | 2 (22.2) | |
| Yes | 1 (16.7) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 3 (66.7) | 2 (33.3) |
ORR, overall response rate. P value was calculated by comparing ORR rates between subgroups using two sided Fisher-exact Chi-square test
Fig. 3Response of enrolled population receiving CATAP treatment. (a) Swimmer’s plot showing patients’ time to response and current status if applicable; arrow indicates the patient still on study. (b) Spider plot showing the change of sum of target lesions over time based on RECIST 1.1 criteria
Fig. 4The immune correlative studies and NGS of the enrolled patients. (a) Dynamic changes of serum IL-6 and lymphocytes subsets of patients with paired test results during the first combined CATAP treatment of the combined stage. (b) Changes of serum IL-6 and lymphocytes subsets of patients with paired test results before and 3 weeks after the first combined CATAP treatment of the combined stage. (c) Tumor mutation burden of responders and non-responders. (d) Heatmap of genetic alterations in pretreatment tumors of responding and non-responding patients. Melanoma signature genes, PD-1 blockade-associated genes that found mutated in our cohort and mutated genes occurred in more than 25% in non-responding patients while absent in the responding group were displayed