Michael R Boniello1, Paul M Schwingler1, Justin M Bonner2, Samuel P Robinson2, Andrew Cotter3, Kevin F Bonner4. 1. Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.A. 2. Jordan-Young Institute for Orthopedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Virginia Beach, Virginia, U.S.A. 3. LifeNet Health, Virginia Beach, Virginia, U.S.A. 4. Jordan-Young Institute for Orthopedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Virginia Beach, Virginia, U.S.A.. Electronic address: kfbonner@cox.net.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile strength of hamstring grafts of varying combined pull-through diameters within the clinically relevant range of 6 to 9 mm. METHODS: We tested 44 non-irradiated allograft hamstring grafts (11 per group). Combined looped semitendinosus and gracilis grafts were allocated to the 6-, 7-, 8-, or 9-mm group based on the smallest-diameter lumen that the graft could be "pulled through" using a surgical sizing instrument. Testing was performed on an Instron materials testing machine (Instron, Norwood, MA). Samples were secured with cryoclamps, prestressed, and pulled to failure at a rate of 10% gauge length per second. RESULTS: The mean load to failure was 2,359 ± 474 N, 3,263 ± 677 N, 3,908 ± 556 N, and 4,360 ± 606 N for the 6-, 7-, 8-, and 9-mm grafts, respectively. Minimum failure loads were as low as 1,567 N, 2,288 N, 2,874 N, and 3,720 N for each group, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the 6- and 7-mm, 6- and 8-mm, 6- and 9-mm, and 7- and 9-mm groups (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Statistically different increasing tensile strength was seen as graft diameter increased. Significant variability exists in the strength of multi-stranded hamstring allografts within the diameter range of 6 to 9 mm that often falls well below the commonly accepted value of 4,000 N for a hamstring graft. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Recent evidence suggests a higher early failure rate of hamstring autografts in subsets of patients with graft diameters of 8 mm or less. This study may increase awareness that hamstring grafts may not be nearly as strong as previously appreciated and that increasing tendon diameters by 1 to 2 mm may dramatically affect graft strength. These data may be helpful in preoperative discussions regarding variable hamstring size, strength, and potential intraoperative augmentation options.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile strength of hamstring grafts of varying combined pull-through diameters within the clinically relevant range of 6 to 9 mm. METHODS: We tested 44 non-irradiated allograft hamstring grafts (11 per group). Combined looped semitendinosus and gracilis grafts were allocated to the 6-, 7-, 8-, or 9-mm group based on the smallest-diameter lumen that the graft could be "pulled through" using a surgical sizing instrument. Testing was performed on an Instron materials testing machine (Instron, Norwood, MA). Samples were secured with cryoclamps, prestressed, and pulled to failure at a rate of 10% gauge length per second. RESULTS: The mean load to failure was 2,359 ± 474 N, 3,263 ± 677 N, 3,908 ± 556 N, and 4,360 ± 606 N for the 6-, 7-, 8-, and 9-mm grafts, respectively. Minimum failure loads were as low as 1,567 N, 2,288 N, 2,874 N, and 3,720 N for each group, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the 6- and 7-mm, 6- and 8-mm, 6- and 9-mm, and 7- and 9-mm groups (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Statistically different increasing tensile strength was seen as graft diameter increased. Significant variability exists in the strength of multi-stranded hamstring allografts within the diameter range of 6 to 9 mm that often falls well below the commonly accepted value of 4,000 N for a hamstring graft. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Recent evidence suggests a higher early failure rate of hamstring autografts in subsets of patients with graft diameters of 8 mm or less. This study may increase awareness that hamstring grafts may not be nearly as strong as previously appreciated and that increasing tendon diameters by 1 to 2 mm may dramatically affect graft strength. These data may be helpful in preoperative discussions regarding variable hamstring size, strength, and potential intraoperative augmentation options.
Authors: Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Marcio Albers; Cara Vernacchia; James J Irrgang; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Meghan W Richardson; Nicholas D Tsouris; Chaudry R Hassan; Justen H Elbayar; Yi-Xian Qin; David E Komatsu; Angelo V Rizzi; James M Paci Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Luis Fernando Z Funchal; Rafael Ortiz; Andrew Jimenez; Gabriella Di Giunta Funchal; Moises Cohen; Diego Costa Astur Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-03-10