Literature DB >> 32332283

Parameters of fluid responsiveness.

Rui Shi1,2, Xavier Monnet1,2, Jean-Louis Teboul1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: On the basis of recent literature, we summarized the new advances on the use of available dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. RECENT
FINDINGS: Reliability of passive leg raising to assess fluid responsiveness is well established provided that a real-time haemodynamic assessment is available. Recent studies have focused on totally noninvasive techniques to assess its haemodynamic effects with promising results. Presence of intra-abdominal hypertension is associated with false-negative cases of passive leg raising. Use of pulse pressure and stroke volume variations is limited and other heart-lung interaction tests have been developed. The tidal volume challenge may overcome the limitation of low tidal volume ventilation. Preliminary data suggest that changes in pulse pressure variation during this test well predict fluid responsiveness. Growing evidence confirms the good predictive performance of the end-expiratory occlusion test. All these dynamic tests allow selecting appropriate fluid responders and preventing excessive fluid administration. Performance of a mini-fluid challenge may help for the decision-making process of fluid management if other tests are not available.
SUMMARY: Several new dynamic variables and monitoring techniques to predict fluid responsiveness were investigated in the past years. Nevertheless, further research investigating their reliability and feasibility in larger cohorts is warranted. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32332283     DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation.

Authors:  Jan Bakker; Eduardo Kattan; Djillali Annane; Ricardo Castro; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Arnaldo Dubin; Laura Evans; Michelle Ng Gong; Olfa Hamzaoui; Can Ince; Bruno Levy; Xavier Monnet; Gustavo A Ospina Tascón; Marlies Ostermann; Michael R Pinsky; James A Russell; Bernd Saugel; Thomas W L Scheeren; Jean-Louis Teboul; Antoine Vieillard Baron; Jean-Louis Vincent; Fernando G Zampieri; Glenn Hernandez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Soufia Ayed; Francesca Moretto; Danila Azzolina; Nello De Vita; Francesco Gavelli; Simone Carelli; Arthur Pavot; Christopher Lai; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.334

3.  Assessment of Dynamic Changes in Stressed Volume and Venous Return during Hyperdynamic Septic Shock.

Authors:  Athanasios Chalkias; Eleni Laou; Nikolaos Papagiannakis; Vaios Spyropoulos; Evaggelia Kouskouni; Kassiani Theodoraki; Theodoros Xanthos
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 4.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Rui Shi; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 10.318

Review 5.  Evaluation of fluid responsiveness during COVID-19 pandemic: what are the remaining choices?

Authors:  Ahmed Hasanin; Maha Mostafa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  German Devia Jaramillo; Salvador Menendez Ramirez
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-12

7.  Predictive Value of the Respiratory Variation in Inferior Vena Cava Diameter for Ventilated Children With Septic Shock.

Authors:  Zihong Xiong; Guoying Zhang; Qin Zhou; Bing Lu; Xuemei Zheng; Mengjun Wu; Yi Qu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.569

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.