Literature DB >> 32332077

2019 EULAR points to consider for non-physician health professionals to prevent and manage fragility fractures in adults 50 years or older.

Jo Adams1, Nicky Wilson1, Emalie Hurkmans2, Margot Bakkers3, Petra Balážová4,5, Mark Baxter6, Anne-Birgitte Blavnsfeldt7, Karine Briot8, Catharina Chiari9, Cyrus Cooper10, Razvan Gabriel Dragoi11, Gabriele Gäbler12, Willem Lems13, Erika Mosor12, Sandra Pais14, Cornelia Simon15, Paul Studenic16, Simon Tilley6,17, Jenny de la Torre-Aboki18, Tanja A Stamm19,20.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) points to consider for non-physician health professionals to prevent and manage fragility fractures in adults 50 years or older.
METHODS: Points to consider were developed in accordance with EULAR standard operating procedures for EULAR-endorsed recommendations, led by an international multidisciplinary task force, including patient research partners and different health professionals from 10 European countries. Level of evidence and strength of recommendation were determined for each point to consider, and the mean level of agreement among the task force members was calculated.
RESULTS: Two overarching principles and seven points to consider were formulated based on scientific evidence and the expert opinion of the task force. The two overarching principles focus on shared decisions between patients and non-physician health professionals and involvement of different non-physician health professionals in prevention and management of fragility fractures. Four points to consider relate to prevention: identification of patients at risk of fracture, fall risk evaluation, multicomponent interventions to prevent primary fracture and discouragement of smoking and overuse of alcohol. The remaining three focus on management of fragility fractures: exercise and nutritional interventions, the organisation and coordination of multidisciplinary services for post-fracture models of care and adherence to anti-osteoporosis medicines. The mean level of agreement among the task force for the overarching principles and the points to consider ranged between 8.4 and 9.6.
CONCLUSION: These first EULAR points to consider for non-physician health professionals to prevent and manage fragility fractures in adults 50 years or older serve to guide healthcare practice and education. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health services research; multidisciplinary team-care; osteoporosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32332077      PMCID: PMC7788058          DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   27.973


  78 in total

1.  Efficacy of a short multidisciplinary falls prevention program for elderly persons with osteoporosis and a fall history: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ellen Smulders; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Brenda E Groen; Jacques Duysens; Agnes Eijsbouts; Roland Laan; Wim van Lankveld
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Cigarette smoking and risk of hip fracture in women: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Guang Si Shen; Yong Li; GuoYang Zhao; Hai Bin Zhou; Zong Gang Xie; Wei Xu; Hai Nan Chen; Qi Rong Dong; You Jia Xu
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cigarette smoking on bone mineral density.

Authors:  K D Ward; R C Klesges
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Exercise and Sports Science Australia (ESSA) position statement on exercise prescription for the prevention and management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Belinda R Beck; Robin M Daly; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Dennis R Taaffe
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 5.  Effects of Exercise on Bone Status in Female Subjects, from Young Girls to Postmenopausal Women: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Jincheng Xu; Giovanni Lombardi; Wei Jiao; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Diet, nutrition and the prevention of osteoporosis.

Authors:  A Prentice
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; C De Laet; J A Eisman; S Fujiwara; H Kroger; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Persistence with denosumab and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective, observational study, and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Karlsson; J Lundkvist; E Psachoulia; M Intorcia; O Ström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Risk of subsequent fracture after prior fracture among older women.

Authors:  A Balasubramanian; J Zhang; L Chen; D Wenkert; S G Daigle; A Grauer; J R Curtis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Prevention and management of osteoporotic fractures by non-physician health professionals: a systematic literature review to inform EULAR points to consider.

Authors:  Nicky Wilson; Emailie Hurkmans; Jo Adams; Margot Bakkers; Petra Balážová; Mark Baxter; Anne-Birgitte Blavnsfeldt; Karine Briot; Catharina Chiari; Cyrus Cooper; Razvan Dragoi; Gabriele Gäbler; Willem Lems; Erika Mosor; Sandra Pais; Cornelia Simon; Paul Studenic; Simon Tilley; Jenny de la Torre; Tanja A Stamm
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2020-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Glucocorticoids in Lupus Nephritis: New Pathways for an Old Drug.

Authors:  Juan M Mejía-Vilet; Isabelle Ayoub
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.