Literature DB >> 32332016

Impact of DNA Damage Response and Repair (DDR) Gene Mutations on Efficacy of PD-(L)1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Mark M Awad1, Michael L Cheng2, Biagio Ricciuti2, Gonzalo Recondo2, Liam F Spurr3,4, Yvonne Y Li3,4, Giuseppe Lamberti2, Deepti Venkatraman2, Renato Umeton5,6, Andrew D Cherniack3,4, Mizuki Nishino7, Lynette M Sholl8, Geoffrey I Shapiro3,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: DNA damage response and repair (DDR) gene alterations are associated with increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, higher genomic instability, and higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) in cancer. Whether DDR alterations are associated with clinical outcomes to programmed death ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Tumors from patients treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors were analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Cancers were categorized on the basis of the presence or absence of deleterious mutations across a panel of 53 DDR genes. Clinical outcomes to PD-(L)1 inhibitors were evaluated according to DDR mutation status.
RESULTS: Of 266 patients with successful NGS who received PD-(L)1 inhibitors, 132 (49.6%) were identified as having deleterious DDR mutations (DDR-positive). DDR-positive and DDR-negative groups were similar in terms of baseline clinicopathologic characteristics. The median TMB was significantly higher in the DDR-positive group compared with the DDR-negative group (12.1 vs. 7.6 mutations/megabase; P < 0.001). Compared with DDR-negative patients (N = 134), DDR-positive patients had a significantly higher objective response rate (30.3% vs. 17.2%; P = 0.01), longer median progression-free survival [PFS; 5.4 vs. 2.2 months; HR, 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.76); P < 0.001], and longer median overall survival [OS; 18.8 vs. 9.9 months; HR, 0.57 (95% CI, 0.42-0.77); P < 0.001] with PD-(L)1 therapy. After adjusting for PD-L1, TMB, performance status, tobacco use, and line of therapy, DDR-positive status was associated with a significantly longer PFS [HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.51-0.92); P = 0.01] and OS [HR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.43-0.85); P = 0.004] in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Deleterious DDR mutations are frequent in NSCLC and are associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 blockade. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32332016     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  41 in total

1.  ATR Inhibitor M6620 (VX-970) Enhances the Effect of Radiation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastasis Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Authors:  Andrew M Baschnagel; Jacob H Elnaggar; Haley J VanBeek; Ashley C Kromke; Justin H Skiba; Saakshi Kaushik; Lindsey Abel; Paul A Clark; Colin A Longhurst; Kwangok P Nickel; Ticiana A Leal; Shuang G Zhao; Randall J Kimple
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Inhibition of Mtorc1/2 and DNA-PK via CC-115 Synergizes with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Gina M Castellano; Saman Zeeshan; Olga B Garbuzenko; Hatim E Sabaawy; Jyoti Malhotra; Tamara Minko; Sharon R Pine
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 6.009

Review 3.  [DNA Damage Repair System and Antineoplastic Agents in Lung Cancer].

Authors:  Linlin Zhang; Fanlu Meng; Diansheng Zhong
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Increased DNA Polymerase Epsilon Catalytic Subunit Expression Predicts Tumor Progression and Modulates Tumor Microenvironment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Haijia Tang; Xiaoxin Hu; Fujiang Xu; Kefei Lin; Wenhao Xu; Haineng Huang; Hailiang Zhang; Yu Xiao; Dongdong Sun; Wangrui Liu; Shiyin Wei
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.478

5.  Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Dan Sha; Zhaohui Jin; Jan Budczies; Klaus Kluck; Albrecht Stenzinger; Frank A Sinicrope
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 38.272

6.  Diverse immune response of DNA damage repair-deficient tumors.

Authors:  Tao Qing; Tomi Jun; Katherine E Lindblad; Amaia Lujambio; Michal Marczyk; Lajos Pusztai; Kuan-Lin Huang
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 7.  Current and future biomarkers for outcomes with immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Boris Duchemann; Jordi Remon; Marie Naigeon; Lydie Cassard; Jean Mehdi Jouniaux; Lisa Boselli; Jonathan Grivel; Edouard Auclin; Aude Desnoyer; Benjamin Besse; Nathalie Chaput
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06

Review 8.  Homozygous Co-Deletion of Type I Interferons and CDKN2A Genes in Thoracic Cancers: Potential Consequences for Therapy.

Authors:  Marion Grard; Camille Chatelain; Tiphaine Delaunay; Elvire Pons-Tostivint; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-François Fonteneau
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Influence of Different Age Cutoff Points on the Prediction of Prognosis of Cancer Patients Receiving ICIs and Potential Mechanistic Exploration.

Authors:  Rui Guan; Qiong Lyu; Anqi Lin; Junyi Liang; Weimin Ding; Manming Cao; Peng Luo; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Molecular and Clinical Features of Hospital Admissions in Patients with Thoracic Malignancies on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Dan Zhao; Haiqing Li; Isa Mambetsariev; Chen Chen; Rebecca Pharaon; Jeremy Fricke; Angel R Baroz; Prakash Kulkarni; Yan Xing; Erminia Massarelli; Marianna Koczywas; Karen L Reckamp; Kim Margolin; Ravi Salgia
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.