| Literature DB >> 32331367 |
Michelina Catauro1, Cristina Scolaro2, Giovanni Dal Poggetto3, Severina Pacifico4, Annamaria Visco2,5.
Abstract
In the present paper, we investigate the effectiveness of nanocomposites (comEntities:
Keywords: FTIR; UHMWPE; bio-activity; nanocomposites; wear tests
Year: 2020 PMID: 32331367 PMCID: PMC7240565 DOI: 10.3390/polym12040978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Values of reference UP and of the nanocomposites at different immersion times. U, ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE); P, paraffin oil; C, carbon nanofiller.
| Sample Code | Density (g/mL) |
|---|---|
| UP | 0.866 ± 0.001 |
| UPC 0.1 wt % | 0.864 ± 0.001 |
| UPC 0.5 wt % | 0.862 ± 0.002 |
| UPC 1.0 wt % | 0.862 ± 0.004 |
| UPC 1.5 wt % | 0.863 ± 0.002 |
| UPC 2.0 wt % | 0.865 ± 0.002 |
Body fluid (simulated body fluid, SBF) composition.
| Ion | Concentration/mol m3 | |
|---|---|---|
| SBF | Human Blood Plasma | |
|
| 142.0 | 142.0 |
|
| 5.0 | 5.0 |
|
| 1.5 | 1.5 |
|
| 2.5 | 2.5 |
|
| 147.8 | 103.0 |
|
| 4.2 | 27.0 |
|
| 1.0 | 1.0 |
|
| 0.5 | 0.5 |
Figure 1Wear rate of all of the samples vs. the carbon nano-filler (CNF) amount in different media (air, distilled water, and artificial and natural lubricant). The differences between the groups are statistically significant according to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) interaction and post hoc Bonferroni test, p < 0.0001).
Figure 2Total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR/FTIR) spectroscopy spectra of (a) UP; (b) UPC 0.1 wt % CNF; (c) UPC 0.5 wt % CNF; (d) UPC 1.0 wt % CNF; and (e) UPC 2.0 wt % CNF. U, ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE); P, paraffin oil; C, carbon nanofiller.
Figure 3Total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR/FTIR) spectroscopy spectra of (a) UP; (b) UPC 0.1 wt % CNF; (c) UPC 0.5 wt % CNF; (d) UPC 1.0 wt % CNF; and (e) UPC 2.0 wt % CNF after 21 days in simulated body fluid (SBF).
Figure 4(A) Representative image of E. coli and E. faecalis incubated with all materials. (B) Bacteria growth (%) of E. coli and E. faecalis incubated with UP, UPC 0.1 wt %, UPC 0.5 wt %, UPC 1.0 wt %, and UPC 2.0 wt %. Values are the mean SD of measurements carried out on samples analyzed three times. The means and S.D. are shown. * p < 0.05 vs. the bacteria control treated without materials.
Figure 5(A) Data from MTT assay expressed as NIH-3T3 cells viability (%) vs. untreated cells. Values are the mean ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate. *p < 0.05 vs. untreated cells. The increase in cell viability vs. UP sample is also shown. (B) Representative cell morphology images of NIH-3T3 cells after treatment with investigated samples. Images were acquired by Inverted Phase Contrast Brightfield Zeiss Primo Vert Microscope.