| Literature DB >> 32331216 |
Arseniy A Otlyotov1, Igor V Ryzhov1, Ilya A Kuzmin1, Yuriy A Zhabanov1, Maxim S Mikhailov1, Pavel A Stuzhin1.
Abstract
Electronic and geometric structures of Ca(II) and Zn(II) complexes with porphyrazine (Pz) and tetrakis(1,2,5-thiadiazole)porphyrazine (TTDPz) were investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations and compared. The perimeter of the coordination cavity was found to be practically independent on the nature of a metal and a ligand. According to the results of the natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis and quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) calculations, Ca-N bonds possess larger ionic contributions as compared to Zn-N. The model electronic absorption spectra obtained with the use of time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations indicate a strong bathochromic shift (~70 nm) of the Q-band with a change of Pz ligand by TTDPz for both Ca and Zn complexes. Additionally, CaTTDPz was synthesized and its electronic absorption spectrum was recorded in pyridine and acetone.Entities:
Keywords: 1,2,5-thiadiazole annulated; DFT study; molecular and electronic structure; porphyrazine
Year: 2020 PMID: 32331216 PMCID: PMC7215693 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21082923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Molecular models of M-porphyzarine (MPz) (a) and M-tetrakis(1,2,5-thiadiazole)porphyzarine (MTTDPz) (b) complexes with atom labeling (M = Ca, Zn).
Molecular parameters 1 of M-porphyzarine (MPz) and M-tetrakis(1,2,5-thiadiazole)porphyzarine (TTDPz) complexes optimized at B3LYP/pcseg-2 level.
| CaPz | CaTTDPz | ZnPz | ZnTTDPz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-Np | 2.276 | 2.299 | 1.979 | 2.025 |
| M-X 2 | 1.079 | 1.020 | ||
| Np-Cα | 1.364 | 1.373 | 1.363 | 1.375 |
| Cα-Cβ | 1.458 | 1.462 | 1.457 | 1.458 |
| Cα-Nm | 1.333 | 1.322 | 1.331 | 1.317 |
| Cβ-Cβ | 1.354 | 1.424 | 1.457 | 1.421 |
| Cβ-Nt | 1.316 | 1.316 | ||
| Nt-S | 1.645 | 1.644 | ||
| (Np…Np)opp | 4.008 | 4.120 | 3.958 | 4.049 |
| (Np…Np)adj | 2.834 | 2.913 | 2.799 | 2.863 |
| ∠ (Np–M–Np) | 123.4 | 127.3 | 180.0 | 180.0 |
| ∠ (Np–Cα–Nm) | 127.6 | 128.1 | 127.2 | 128.0 |
| ∠ (Cα–Nm–Cα) | 124.6 | 126.7 | 124.4 | 125.8 |
| ∠ (Cα–Np–Cα) | 107.7 | 111.8 | 108.8 | 111.7 |
| ∠ (Nt–S–Nt) | 100.2 | 100.3 |
1 Bond lengths in Å and bond angles in degrees. 2 X is dummy atom located in center between Np atoms.
Figure 2Schemes of the dominant donor-acceptor interactions between Zn and Pz ligand: (a) the result of the orbital interaction of the type LP(N) → 4s(Zn) (E(2) = 54.0 kcal mol−1); (b) the result of the orbital interaction of the type LP(N) → 4p(Zn) (E(2) = 61.9 kcal mol−1). Only one of the four corresponding interactions is demonstrated.
Figure 3Schemes of the dominant donor-acceptor interactions between Ca and Pz ligand. The results of the: (a) orbital interaction of the type LP(N) → 4s(Ca) (E(2) = 11.0 kcal mol−1); (b) orbital interaction of the type LP(N) → 3dx2−y2(Ca) (E(2) = 3.5 kcal mol−1); (c) orbital interaction of the type LP(N) → 3dyz(Ca) (E(2) = 3.9 kcal mol−1).
Selected parameters of MPz and MTTDPz complexes from NBO and quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) calculations.
| CaPz | ZnPz | CaTTDPz | ZnTTDPz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5.73 | −5.99 | −6.07 | −6.19 | |
| −3.10 | −3.33 | −3.78 | −3.91 | |
| ∆ | 2.64 | 2.66 | 2.29 | 2.29 |
| ∇2ρ, a.u. | 0.219 | 0.394 | 0.207 | 0.339 |
| δ(M|Np) | 0.270 | 0.464 | 0.262 | 0.446 |
| 1.754 | 1.198 | 1.768 | 1.234 | |
| −0.702 | −0.633 | −0.660 | −0.596 | |
| configuration | 4s0.123d0.14 | 4s0.363d9.964p0.48 | 4s0.113d0.13 | 4s0.353d9.974p0.44 |
| ∑ E(d-a), kcal/mol | 18 | 116 | 17 | 103 |
| Q(M-Np) | 0.110 | 0.336 | 0.104 | 0.321 |
| r(M-Np) | 2.276 | 1.979 | 2.299 | 2.025 |
Figure 4Internal macrocycle perimeter.
Figure 5Influence of the metal (Ca/Zn) and ligand (Pz/TTDPz) on the molecular orbitals of MPz and MTTDPz complexes.
Figure 6Molecular orbital (MO) level diagram for MPz and MTTDPz complexes (M = Ca, Zn). The values of highest occupied molecular orbital-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gaps are given in eV.
Figure 7Calculated TDDFT electronic absorption spectra for MPz and MTTDPz complexes.
Calculated composition of the lowest excited states and corresponding oscillator strengths for MPz and MTTDPz complexes (M = Ca and Zn).
| State | Composition (%) | λ, nm | f | exp λ, nm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 1 1E | 513 | 0.16 | ||
| 4 1E | 344 | 0.21 | ||
| 5 1E | 308 | 0.59 | ||
| 10 1E | 238 | 0.06 | ||
|
| ||||
| 1 1E | 585 | 0.27 | 647 (Py) [this work] | |
| 6 1E | 322 | 0.98 | ||
| 16 1E | 254 | 0.28 | ||
| 17 1E | 251 | 0.15 | ||
| 18 1E | 250 | 0.14 | ||
|
| ||||
| 1 1Eu | 505 | 0.17 | 584 (Py) [ | |
| 3 1Eu | 329 | 0.15 | ||
| 4 1Eu | 307 | 0.71 | 327 | |
| 5 1Eu | 238 | 0.06 | ||
|
| ||||
| 1 1Eu | 580 | 0.29 | 638 (DMSO) [ | |
| 4 1Eu | 334 | 0.28 | 400 | |
| 5 1Eu | 312 | 0.81 | 372 | |
| 8 1Eu | 252 | 0.55 | 320 | |
| 9 1Eu | 246 | 0.05 | ||
| 12 1Eu | 230 | 0.10 |