Cristiano Mendes Gomes1, Marcio Augusto Averbeck2, Mitti Koyama3, Roberto Soler4. 1. Division of Urology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Department of Urology, Moinhos de Vento Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil. 3. Research and Statistical Methodology, Kamiyama Statistical Consulting, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Department of Medical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of individual lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and LUTS-specific bother on daily/leisure activities, work productivity and treatment behaviors and satisfaction in a Brazilian population reporting symptoms of the overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. Methods: Secondary analysis of Brazil LUTS study data, including individuals ≥40 years old with a possible diagnosis of OAB, based on a score of ≥8 on the OAB-V8 questionnaire. Participants used a 5-point Likert scale to rate occurrence of LUTS during the previous month. Regression models were constructed to analyze association of symptom frequency and bother, controlled for demographics, comorbid conditions, habits and body mass index, to outcomes related to people's lives and treatment patterns. Results: This analysis included 5184 individuals (53% female), 24.4% of whom received a possible diagnosis of OAB. There was a greater likelihood of OAB symptoms in men reporting depression/anxiety (2.0 times), diabetes (1.8 times), or constipation (1.9 times) and women reporting depression/anxiety (2.6 times), constipation (1.7 times), and being overweight (1.4 times) or obese (1.8 times). Symptoms of all categories, including voiding, storage, and post-micturition, were associated with a negative impact on individuals' lives, quality of life and treatment-related outcomes. Treatment seeking for OAB was low among men and women overall (35.1 and 43.6%, respectively), with highest rates among individuals in the 60-69 age group.Conclusions: LUTS of all categories impacted all domains studied. These results highlight the importance of comprehensive LUTS assessment in OAB patients, including voiding, storage and post-micturition symptoms.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of individual lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and LUTS-specific bother on daily/leisure activities, work productivity and treatment behaviors and satisfaction in a Brazilian population reporting symptoms of the overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. Methods: Secondary analysis of Brazil LUTS study data, including individuals ≥40 years old with a possible diagnosis of OAB, based on a score of ≥8 on the OAB-V8 questionnaire. Participants used a 5-point Likert scale to rate occurrence of LUTS during the previous month. Regression models were constructed to analyze association of symptom frequency and bother, controlled for demographics, comorbid conditions, habits and body mass index, to outcomes related to people's lives and treatment patterns. Results: This analysis included 5184 individuals (53% female), 24.4% of whom received a possible diagnosis of OAB. There was a greater likelihood of OAB symptoms in men reporting depression/anxiety (2.0 times), diabetes (1.8 times), or constipation (1.9 times) and women reporting depression/anxiety (2.6 times), constipation (1.7 times), and being overweight (1.4 times) or obese (1.8 times). Symptoms of all categories, including voiding, storage, and post-micturition, were associated with a negative impact on individuals' lives, quality of life and treatment-related outcomes. Treatment seeking for OAB was low among men and women overall (35.1 and 43.6%, respectively), with highest rates among individuals in the 60-69 age group.Conclusions: LUTS of all categories impacted all domains studied. These results highlight the importance of comprehensive LUTS assessment in OABpatients, including voiding, storage and post-micturition symptoms.
Entities:
Keywords:
Brazil; Overactive bladder; leisure activity; lower urinary tract symptoms; quality of life; treatment seeking; work
Authors: Mikolaj Przydacz; Przemyslaw Dudek; Tomasz Golabek; Piotr Chlosta Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 3.390