BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are often indolent; however, identifying patients at risk for rapidly progressing variants is critical, particularly for those with small tumors who may be candidates for expectant management. Specific growth rate (SGR) has been predictive of survival in other malignancies but has not been examined in PNETs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent PNET resection from 2000 to 2016 was performed utilizing the multi-institutional United States Neuroendocrine Study Group database. Patients with ≥ 2 preoperative cross-sectional imaging studies at least 30 days apart were included in our analysis (N = 288). Patients were grouped as "high SGR" or "low SGR." Demographic and clinical factors were compared between the groups. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess the impact of various clinical factors on overall survival (OS). RESULTS: High SGR was associated with higher T stage at resection, shorter doubling time, and elevated HbA1c (all P ≤ 0.01). Patients with high SGR had significantly decreased 5-year OS (63 vs 80%, P = 0.01) and disease-specific survival (72 vs 91%, P = 0.03) compared to those with low SGR. In patients with small (≤ 2 cm) tumors (N = 106), high SGR predicted lower 5-year OS (79 vs 96%, P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, high SGR was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio 2.67, 95% confidence interval 1.05-6.84, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: High SGR is associated with worse survival in PNET patients. Evaluating PNET SGR may enhance clinical decision-making, particularly when weighing expectant management versus surgery in patients with small tumors.
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are often indolent; however, identifying patients at risk for rapidly progressing variants is critical, particularly for those with small tumors who may be candidates for expectant management. Specific growth rate (SGR) has been predictive of survival in other malignancies but has not been examined in PNETs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent PNET resection from 2000 to 2016 was performed utilizing the multi-institutional United States Neuroendocrine Study Group database. Patients with ≥ 2 preoperative cross-sectional imaging studies at least 30 days apart were included in our analysis (N = 288). Patients were grouped as "high SGR" or "low SGR." Demographic and clinical factors were compared between the groups. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess the impact of various clinical factors on overall survival (OS). RESULTS: High SGR was associated with higher T stage at resection, shorter doubling time, and elevated HbA1c (all P ≤ 0.01). Patients with high SGR had significantly decreased 5-year OS (63 vs 80%, P = 0.01) and disease-specific survival (72 vs 91%, P = 0.03) compared to those with low SGR. In patients with small (≤ 2 cm) tumors (N = 106), high SGR predicted lower 5-year OS (79 vs 96%, P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, high SGR was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio 2.67, 95% confidence interval 1.05-6.84, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: High SGR is associated with worse survival in PNET patients. Evaluating PNET SGR may enhance clinical decision-making, particularly when weighing expectant management versus surgery in patients with small tumors.
Authors: Matthew H Kulke; Lowell B Anthony; David L Bushnell; Wouter W de Herder; Stanley J Goldsmith; David S Klimstra; Stephen J Marx; Janice L Pasieka; Rodney F Pommier; James C Yao; Robert T Jensen Journal: Pancreas Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Trevor A Ellison; Christopher L Wolfgang; Chanjuan Shi; John L Cameron; Peter Murakami; Liew Jun Mun; Aatur D Singhi; Toby C Cornish; Kelly Olino; Zina Meriden; Michael Choti; Luis A Diaz; Timothy M Pawlik; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Barish H Edil Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Olca Basturk; Laura Tang; Ralph H Hruban; Volkan Adsay; Zhaohai Yang; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Efsevia Vakiani; Stefano La Rosa; Kee-Taek Jang; Wendy L Frankel; Xiuli Liu; Lizhi Zhang; Thomas J Giordano; Andrew M Bellizzi; Jey-Hsin Chen; Chanjuan Shi; Peter Allen; Diane L Reidy; Christopher L Wolfgang; Burcu Saka; Neda Rezaee; Vikram Deshpande; David S Klimstra Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: John G Touzios; James M Kiely; Susan C Pitt; William S Rilling; Edward J Quebbeman; Stuart D Wilson; Henry A Pitt Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jovenel Cherenfant; Susan J Stocker; Mistry K Gage; Hongyan Du; Tiffany A Thurow; Melanie Odeleye; Scott W Schimpke; Karen L Kaul; Curtis R Hall; Ihab Lamzabi; Paolo Gattuso; David J Winchester; Robert W Marsh; Kevin K Roggin; David J Bentrem; Marshall S Baker; Richard A Prinz; Mark S Talamonti Journal: Surgery Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Yuchen Jiao; Chanjuan Shi; Barish H Edil; Roeland F de Wilde; David S Klimstra; Anirban Maitra; Richard D Schulick; Laura H Tang; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; Victor E Velculescu; Luis A Diaz; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler; Ralph H Hruban; Nickolas Papadopoulos Journal: Science Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Joseph Rubin; Michael B Farnell; Clive S Grant; Gloria M Petersen Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 5.678