| Literature DB >> 32328281 |
Hannaneh Moniri1, Reza Farahmandfar1, Ali Motamedzadegan1.
Abstract
The effects of different drying methods (hot air drying at 40, 60, and 80°C, and foam-mat drying) on the characteristics (FT-IR, zeta potential, conductivity, color, rheology, texture, and emulsifying) of extracted cress seed gum (CSG) have been investigated. The models described the rheological behavior of CSG with high R 2, but in general Herschel-Bulkley's model has higher values of R 2 and lower values of RMSE compared to the fitted models. The HD 80 has high amount of viscosity. This means that as the temperature rises, the gel network is getting stronger, and gums from the internal CSG sections have a stronger gel network. Results of strain sweep test demonstrated that storage ( G LVE ' ) and loss modulus ( G LVE ″ ) for all solutions except foam-mat drying in the linear area showed solid-like behavior. The parameters of strain sweep (Gf, τf, τy, G LVE ″ , G LVE ' , YLVE) increased with increasing temperatures. Frequency sweep test showed that storage ( G LVE ' ) was greater than loss modulus ( G LVE ″ ) and samples have a solid behavior but foam-mat drying exhibited liquid behavior. Increasing temperature has a direct impact on texture, so hardness and adhesion are increased consequently. Generally, CSG has good emulsifying and foaming characteristics, but no significant difference was observed.Entities:
Keywords: cress seed gum; drying; foam‐mat; rheology; texture
Year: 2020 PMID: 32328281 PMCID: PMC7174221 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT‐IR) of drying methods. HD (hot air drying)
Zeta potential and conductivity of cress seed gum solutions (0.1%)
| Drying method | Zeta (Mv) | Conductivity (mS/cm) |
|---|---|---|
| HD 40°C | −40.5 ± 1.2c | 0.173 ± 0.001c |
| HD 60°C | −39.9 ± 1.0bc | 0.172 ± 0.002c |
| HD 80°C | −38.5 ± 1.2b | 0.183 ± 0.001b |
| Foam‐mat D | −27.3 ± 0.1a | 0.194 ± 0.001a |
HD (hot air drying).
Different letters indicate significant differences between samples at p < .05.
Effects of drying methods on the color characteristics of cress seed gum (CSG)
| Drying method | L* | a* | b* | BI* | C* | HUE* | ΔE* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HD 40°C | 99.68 ± 0.02c | 0.07 ± 0.01b | 0.85 ± 0.05a | 0.88 ± 0.05a | 0.85 ± 0.05a | 85.24 ± 0.46b | 19/00 ± 0.05a |
| HD 60°C | 99.72 ± 0.04bc | 0.10 ± 0.02a | 0.54 ± 0.06b | 0.61 ± 0.07b | 0.55 ± 0.06b | 79.65 ± 0.71c | 8.97 ± 0.04b |
| HD 80°C | 99.73 ± 0.01b | 0.11 ± 0.01a | 0.53 ± 0.02b | 0.60 ± 0.02b | 0.54 ± 0.02b | 78.52 ± 0.70c | 8.99 ± 0.01b |
| Foam‐mat | 99.89 ± 0.01a | −0.05 ± 0.007c | 0.17 ± 0.02c | 0.13 ± 0.01c | 0.17 ± 0.02c | 106.00 ± 2.02a | 2.99 ± 0.01c |
HD (hot air drying).
Different letters indicate significant differences between samples at p < .05.
Figure 2Influence of drying methods on apparent viscosity of cress seed gum. HD (hot air drying)
Rheological parameters of CSG at different drying temperatures
| Model | HD 40°C | HD 60°C | HD 80°C | Foam‐mat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power law model | ||||
| Kp (Pa sn) | 1.641 ± 0.258a | 1.037 ± 0.027b | 1.847 ± 0.023a | 0.041 ± 0.003c |
|
| 0.323 ± 0.031c | 0.381 ± 0.002b | 0.357 ± 0.002b | 0.757 ± 0.009a |
|
| 0.976 | 0.979 | 0.976 | 0.999 |
| RMSE | 0.372 | 0.341 | 0.576 | 0.027 |
| Herschel–Bulkley model | ||||
|
| 0.750 ± 0.150b | 0.550 ± 0.020c | 0.914 ± 0.019a | 0.034 ± 0.002d |
|
| 0.459 ± 0.018c | 0.491 ± 0.003b | 0.478 ± 0.004b | 0.790 ± 0.006a |
| τ0H (Pa) | 0.955 ± 0.144a | 0.584 ± 0.004b | 1.062 ± 0.003a | 0.033 ± 0.004c |
|
| 0.991 | 0.991 | 0.991 | 0.999 |
| RMSE | 0.215 | 0.222 | 0.363 | 0.018 |
| Bingham model | ||||
| τ0B (Pa) | 1.944 ± 0.356b | 1.337 ± 0.029c | 2.293 ± 0.017a | 0.091 ± 0.007d |
|
| 0.039 ± 0.012b | 0.034 ± 0.001b | 0.053 ± 0.000a | 0.011 ± 0.000c |
|
| 0.900 | 0.907 | 0.902 | 0.988 |
| RMSE | 0.725 | 0.712 | 1.160 | 0.079 |
| Casson model | ||||
| τ0
| 3.164 ± 0.748b | 2.675 ± 0.058b | 4.587 ± 0.033a | 0.182 ± 0.014c |
| ηc (pa s) | 0.015 ± 0.001b | 0.019 ± 0.000a | 0.019 ± 0.000a | 0.018 ± 0.000a |
|
| 0.898 | 0.907 | 0.902 | 0.988 |
| RMSE | 0.604 | 0.712 | 1.160 | 0.079 |
HD (hot air drying).
Different letters indicate significant differences between samples at p < .05.
Figure 3(a) Strain sweep dependency of storage (G′) and loss modulus (G″) at frequency = 1Hz at 20°C, (b) frequency sweep test of G′ and G″, and (c) Cox–Merz curve of cress seed gum (CSG) solution (1.5%). HD (hot air drying)
Storage modulus (), loss modulus, the critical strain (ΥL%), loss tangent (tanδLVE), flow‐point stress (τ), and yield stress (τy) in the linear viscoelastic region, and corresponding modulus (Gf: G′ = G″) in the strain sweep test at frequency (1 HZ), frequency sweep parameters (G′, G″, complex viscosity (ɳ*), Tan(δ), and slope of ɳ*) at frequency (1Hz), strain (0.3%), and frequency dependency of the storage modulus (G′) and loss (G″) for CSG 1.5% at 20℃
| Parameter | HD 40°C | HD 60°C | HD 80°C | Foam‐mat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain sweep parameters | ||||
| YL (%) | 3.15 ± 0.01a | 3.15 ± 0.01a | 3.13 ± 0.01a | 1.48 ± 0.52b |
| Tan(δ) | 0.43 ± 0.01a | 0.50 ± 0.01a | 0.43 ± 0.00a | 0.63 ± 0.37a |
|
| 6.79 ± 0.45b | 5.11 ± 0.04c | 9.68 ± 0.84a | 3.67 ± 0.17d |
|
| 2.49 ± 0.08ab | 2.11 ± 0.03b | 3.21 ± 0.10a | 2.12 ± 0.88b |
|
| 2.90 ± 0.13b | 2.54 ± 0.02bc | 4.14 ± 0.36a | 2.32 ± 0.32c |
| τ | 0.23 ± 0.01b | 0.18 ± 0.00c | 0.33 ± 0.03a | 0.06 ± 0.04d |
| τ | 3.02 ± 0.13b | 2.37 ± 0.02c | 3.76 ± 0.10a | 0.08 ± 0.01d |
| Frequency dependency of G′ | ||||
| a | 7.08 ± 0.09b | 5.53 ± 0.13c | 10.23 ± 0.08a | 0.11 ± 0.02d |
| b | 0.22 ± 0.06b | 0.24 ± 0.04b | 0.22 ± 0.05b | 1.21 ± 0.16a |
|
| 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| RMSE | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.04 |
| Frequency dependency of G″ | ||||
| c | 2.92 ± 0.00b | 2.81 ± 0.11b | 4.22 ± 0.09a | 0.20 ± 0.01c |
| d | 0.44 ± 0.00b | 0.46 ± 0.01b | 0.43 ± 0.00b | 0.80 ± 0.05a |
|
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 |
| RMSE | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.02 |
| Frequency sweep parameters | ||||
|
| 7.28 ± 0.19a | 5.60 ± 0.20c | 10.35 ± 0.25a | 0.10 ± 0.09d |
|
| 2.78 ± 0.11b | 2.61 ± 0.10c | 4.15 ± 0.09a | 0.21 ± 0.03d |
| Tan(δ) | 0.38 ± 0.02b | 0.47 ± 0.00b | 0.40 ± 0.00b | 2.17 ± 1.04a |
| ɳ* (Pa s) | 1.15 ± 0.03b | 0.91 ± 0.03c | 1.64 ± 0.04a | 0.04 ± 0.03d |
| Slope of ɳ* |
|
|
|
|
HD (hot air drying).
Different letters indicate significant differences between samples at p < .05.
Figure 4Influence of drying methods on textural properties of cress seed gum gel. (a) hardness; (b) adhesiveness. HD (hot air drying). Columns with different letters are significantly different (p < .05)
Figure 5Effects of drying methods on emulsifying and foaming properties of cress seed gum (CSG). (a) emulsion capacity and emulsion stability; (b) foaming capacity and foaming stability). HD (hot air drying). Columns with different letters are significantly different (p < .05)