| Literature DB >> 32328250 |
Penghui Yu1,2,3, Hao Huang2, Xi Zhao2, Ni Zhong2, Hongfa Zheng2, Yushun Gong1,3.
Abstract
The quality of Congou black tea fluctuates greatly with the changing seasons. However, variations in the taste quality of Congou black tea manufactured during a single spring season are far from clear. Here, we analyzed the taste quality of HuangJinCha (HJC) Congou black tea using sensory evaluation and found the taste quality of black tea manufactured in the early spring was better than that manufactured in the late spring. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis for the data from the electronic tongue confirmed the variation and revealed that April 4 may be the critical time point at which variations in taste quality become apparent. The contents of tea polyphenols (TP), total catechins (TC), total flavones, (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), (-)-epicatechin gallate (ECG), and gallic acid (GA) showed increasing trends, whereas total amino acids (TAA) declined over time. Moreover, the variations in total amino acids (r = 0.846) and total flavones (r = - 0.858) were highly significantly correlated with the average taste quality score (p < .01), suggesting these compounds were the primary factors responsible for the fluctuation in taste quality of Congou black tea processed during a single spring season.Entities:
Keywords: black tea; electronic tongue; sensory evaluation; spring season; taste quality
Year: 2020 PMID: 32328250 PMCID: PMC7174197 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Sensory evaluation of black tea taste during a single spring season. Different lowercase letters in the figure indicate significant (p < .05) differences in the taste average score of black tea samples
Figure 2Electronic tongue analysis of HuangJinCha (HJC) black tea samples: (a) Principal component analysis (PCA) score plot; (b) Cluster analysis
Figure 3Contents of chemical compounds in black tea samples manufactured during a single spring. (a) Water extract. (b) Tea polyphenols. (c) Total catechins. (d) Total flavones. (e) Total amino acids. (f) Soluble sugar. (g) Gallic acid. (h) Caffeine. Different lowercase letters in the figure indicate significant (p < .05) differences in the contents of compounds
Figure 4Heat map of catechin monomers [(‐)‐Epigallocatechin (EGC), (‐)‐epicatechin (EC), (‐)‐epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and (‐)‐epicatechin gallate (ECG)], sweet amino acids (SAA), bitter amino acids (BAA), and umami amino acids (UAA) contents in tea samples from a single spring season. Contents of components are illustrated on a red (high) to blue (low) scale
Figure 5Variations of theaflavins (TFs) content, thearubigins (TRs) content, and theabrownins (TBs) content in black tea samples manufactured during a single spring season. Different lowercase letters in the figure indicate significant (p < .05) differences in the content of compounds
Figure 6Correlation coefficient of the taste average score and chemical compounds. (*) p < .05; (**) p < .01