| Literature DB >> 32328112 |
Jean Baptiste Niyibizi1,2, Peter G Kirira3,4, Francis T Kimani4, Fiona Oyatsi3,5, Joseph K Ng'ang'a1,5.
Abstract
Malaria is a disease caused by protozoans transmitted to humans by infected female Anopheles mosquitoes. According to the WHO report of 2015, there were 214 million cases of malaria with 438,000 deaths worldwide. Ninety percent of world's malaria cases occur in Africa, where the disease is recognized as a serious impediment to economic and social development. Despite advancement in malaria research, the disease continues to be a global problem, especially in developing countries. Currently, there is no effective vaccine for malaria control. In addition, although there are effective drugs for treatment of malaria, this could be lost to the drug resistance in different Plasmodium species. The most lethal form is caused by P. falciparum which has developed resistance to many chemotherapeutic agents and possibly to the current drugs of choice. Reducing the impact of malaria is a key to achieving the sustainable development goals which are geared toward combating the disease. Covalent bitherapy is a rational and logical way of drug design which entails joining a couple of molecules with individual intrinsic action into a unique agent, hence packaging dual activity into one hybrid. This suggests the need to develop new antimalarial drugs that are effective against malaria parasites based on the new mode of action, molecular targets, and chemical structures. In silico studies have shown that sarcosine is able to bind to unique plasmodia proteins (P. falciparum ATCase), whereas aniline can be a ligand to target protein (enoyl acyl carrier protein reductase), hence suppressing the progression of the disease. The main objective of this study was to synthesize and determine the efficacy and safety of antiplasmodial hybrid drug comprising the sarcosine and aniline derivative for management of plasmodial infections. The hybrid drug was synthesized by adding thionyl chloride to sarcosine to form acyl chloride which was then added to aniline to form sarcosine-aniline hybrid molecule. The IC50 of sarcosine-aniline hybrid was 44.80 ± 4.70 ng/ml compared with that of aniline derivative which was 22.86 ± 1.26 ng/ml. The IC50 of control drugs was 2.63 ± 0.38 ng/ml and 5.69 ± 0.39 ng/ml for artesunate and chloroquine, respectively. There was a significant difference between IC50 of sarcosine-aniline hybrid and aniline derivative (p < 0.05). There was also a significant difference between sarcosine-aniline hybrid and standard drugs used to treat malaria including artesunate and chloroquine (p < 0.05). The ED50 of sarcosine-aniline hybrid drug was 6.49 mg/kg compared with that of aniline derivative which was 3.61 mg/kg. The ED50 of control drugs was 3.56 mg/kg, 2.94 mg/kg, and 1.78 mg/kg for artesunate-aniline hybrid, artesunate, and chloroquine, respectively. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between ED50 of sarcosine-aniline hybrid and both controls such as aniline derivative, artesunate, artesunate-aniline hybrid, and chloroquine. Cytotoxicity results revealed that sarcosine-aniline hybrid was safe to vero cells with a CC50 of 50.18 ± 3.53 μg/ml. Sarcosine-aniline hybrid was significantly less toxic compared with artesunate, chloroquine, and doxorubicin. Sarcosine-aniline hybrid was efficacious and safe to mice. Therefore, covalent bitherapy should be used in drug development for drug resistance mitigation.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32328112 PMCID: PMC7171691 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1643015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Trop Med ISSN: 1687-9686
Figure 1Global distribution of malaria throughout the world (source: World Malaria Report 2018) [1].
Figure 2Structure of aniline and sarcosine.
Figure 3Reaction between sarcosine and thionyl chloride.
Figure 4Coupling acyl chloride to aniline.
Figure 5Thin layer chromatography results
IC50 of sarcosine-aniline hybrid versus control drugs on P. falciparum 3D7 strains.
| Drugs | IC50 |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 1 | Sarcosine-aniline hybrid drug | 44.80 ± 4.70 ng/ml |
|
|
| |
| 2 | Aniline | 22.86 ± 1.26 ng/ml |
|
|
| |
| 3 | Artesunate | 2.63 ± 0.38 ng/ml |
|
| 0.46 | |
| 4 | Chloroquine | 5.69 ± 0.39 ng/ml |
|
| 0.46 | |
| 5 | Sarcosine | No activity | ||||
Significant: p < 0.05. In this table, 1: sarcosine-aniline hybrid drug, 2: aniline, 3: artesunate, 4: chloroquine, and 5: sarcosine.
Figure 6Percentage of parasitaemia chemosupression of sarcosine-aniline hybrid.
ED50 of sarcosine-aniline hybrid versus control drugs on P. berghei ANKA.
| Drugs | ED50 |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
| 1 | Sarcosine-aniline hybrid drug | 6.49 mg/kg |
| 0.1 |
|
|
| |
| 2 | Aniline | 3.61 mg/kg |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 3 | Artesunate-aniline hybrid | 3.56 mg/kg |
| 0.1 |
|
|
| |
| 4 | Artesunate | 2.94 mg/kg |
| 0.424 |
|
|
| |
| 5 | Chloroquine | 1.78 mg/kg |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 6 | Sarcosine | No activity |
|
|
|
|
| |
p a: significant, p < 0.05.
Parasitaemia growth of sarcosine-aniline hybrid after stopping treatment.
| Drugs | Day 7 | Day 9 | Day 11 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sarcosine-aniline hybrid | 9.74 | 12.98 | 15.61 |
| Aniline | 6.97 | 9.03 | 11.84 |
| Artesunate | 0.00 | 0.2 | 0.67 |
| CQ | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.42 |
Survival rate after 11 days of in vivo efficacy testing.
| Dosage (mg/kg) | Sarcosine-aniline hybrid | Sarcosine | 3-Chloro-4-(4-chlorophenoxy) aniline | Artesunate | Artesunate-aniline hybrid | Chloroquine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.25 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 0.625 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Acute toxicity in mice following different dosage administrations.
| Group | Dosage of hybrid drug administered orally (mg/kg) | Number of mice per group | Number of dead mice after 28 days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 2000 | 3 | 0 |
| Group 2 | 300 | 3 | 0 |
| Group 3 | 50 | 3 | 0 |
| Control group | 0 | 3 | 0 |
The CC50 values of the different antimalarial drugs against vero cells.
| SN | Drugs | Mean CC50 in | SD |
|
| |||
| 1 | Sarcosine-aniline hybrid | 50.18 | 3.53 |
| 2 | Chloroquine | 57.96 | 3.85 |
| 3 | Artesunate | 19.69 | 3.26 |
| 4 | Doxorubicin | 1.96 | 0.59 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | Vero sarcosine-aniline hybrid VS vero chloroquine | −7.78 | 0.006 |
| 2 | Vero sarcosine-aniline hybrid VS vero artesunate | 30.48 |
|
| 3 | Vero sarcosine-aniline hybrid VS vero doxorubicin | 48.21 |
|