Literature DB >> 27616650

Microplastic pollution in the Greenland Sea: Background levels and selective contamination of planktivorous diving seabirds.

F Amélineau1, D Bonnet2, O Heitz3, V Mortreux2, A M A Harding4, N Karnovsky5, W Walkusz6, J Fort7, D Grémillet8.   

Abstract

Microplastics have been reported everywhere around the globe. With very limited human activities, the Arctic is distant from major sources of microplastics. However, microplastic ingestions have been found in several Arctic marine predators, confirming their presence in this region. Nonetheless, existing information for this area remains scarce, thus there is an urgent need to quantify the contamination of Arctic marine waters. In this context, we studied microplastic abundance and composition within the zooplankton community off East Greenland. For the same area, we concurrently evaluated microplastic contamination of little auks (Alle alle), an Arctic seabird feeding on zooplankton while diving between 0 and 50 m. The study took place off East Greenland in July 2005 and 2014, under strongly contrasted sea-ice conditions. Among all samples, 97.2% of the debris found were filaments. Despite the remoteness of our study area, microplastic abundances were comparable to those of other oceans, with 0.99 ± 0.62 m-3 in the presence of sea-ice (2005), and 2.38 ± 1.11 m-3 in the nearby absence of sea-ice (2014). Microplastic rise between 2005 and 2014 might be linked to an increase in plastic production worldwide or to lower sea-ice extents in 2014, as sea-ice can represent a sink for microplastic particles, which are subsequently released to the water column upon melting. Crucially, all birds had eaten plastic filaments, and they collected high levels of microplastics compared to background levels with 9.99 and 8.99 pieces per chick meal in 2005 and 2014, respectively. Importantly, we also demonstrated that little auks took more often light colored microplastics, rather than darker ones, strongly suggesting an active contamination with birds mistaking microplastics for their natural prey. Overall, our study stresses the great vulnerability of Arctic marine species to microplastic pollution in a warming Arctic, where sea-ice melting is expected to release vast volumes of trapped debris.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arctic; Little auk; Plastic; Sea ice; Selective uptake; Zooplankton

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27616650     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  13 in total

1.  Removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm-125 μm) during drinking water treatment.

Authors:  Yongli Zhang; Allison Diehl; Ashton Lewandowski; Kishore Gopalakrishnan; Tracie Baker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Estuarine plastisphere as an overlooked source of N2O production.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Su; Leyang Yang; Kai Yang; Yijia Tang; Teng Wen; Yingmu Wang; Matthias C Rillig; Lena Rohe; Junliang Pan; Hu Li; Yong-Guan Zhu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Polystyrene microplastic contamination versus microplankton abundances in two lagoons of the Florida Keys.

Authors:  Susan Badylak; Edward Phlips; Christopher Batich; Miranda Jackson; Anna Wachnicka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Microplastics in eviscerated flesh and excised organs of dried fish.

Authors:  Ali Karami; Abolfazl Golieskardi; Yu Bin Ho; Vincent Larat; Babak Salamatinia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  An end to the controversy over the microscopic detection and effects of pristine microplastics in fish organs.

Authors:  Carolina De Sales-Ribeiro; Yeray Brito-Casillas; Antonio Fernandez; María José Caballero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Currently monitored microplastics pose negligible ecological risk to the global ocean.

Authors:  Ricardo Beiras; Alexandre M Schönemann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Microplastic contamination of the drilling bivalve Hiatella arctica in Arctic rhodolith beds.

Authors:  Sebastian Teichert; Martin G J Löder; Ines Pyko; Marlene Mordek; Christian Schulbert; Max Wisshak; Christian Laforsch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Arctic climate change and pollution impact little auk foraging and fitness across a decade.

Authors:  Françoise Amélineau; David Grémillet; Ann M A Harding; Wojciech Walkusz; Rémi Choquet; Jérôme Fort
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Microplastics in marine mammals stranded around the British coast: ubiquitous but transitory?

Authors:  S E Nelms; J Barnett; A Brownlow; N J Davison; R Deaville; T S Galloway; P K Lindeque; D Santillo; B J Godley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Microplastics in sea ice and seawater beneath ice floes from the Arctic Ocean.

Authors:  La Daana K Kanhai; Katarina Gardfeldt; Thomas Krumpen; Richard C Thompson; Ian O'Connor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.