Literature DB >> 32325112

An FDA/CDER perspective on nonclinical testing strategies: Classical toxicology approaches and new approach methodologies (NAMs).

Amy M Avila1, Ilona Bebenek1, Jessica A Bonzo1, Todd Bourcier1, Karen L Davis Bruno1, David B Carlson1, John Dubinion1, Ikram Elayan1, Wafa Harrouk1, Shwu-Luan Lee1, Donna L Mendrick2, Jill C Merrill1, Jackye Peretz1, Emily Place1, Muriel Saulnier1, Ronald L Wange1, Jia Yao1, Dong Zhao1, Paul C Brown3.   

Abstract

Nonclinical testing of human pharmaceuticals is conducted to assess the safety of compounds to be studied in human clinical trials and for marketing of new drugs. Although there is no exact number and type of nonclinical studies required for safety assessments, as there is inherent flexibility for each new compound, the traditional approach is outlined in various FDA and ICH guidance documents and involves a combination of in vitro assays and whole animal testing methods. Recent advances in science have led to the emergence of numerous new approach methodologies (NAMs) for nonclinical testing that are currently being used in various aspects of drug development. Traditional nonclinical testing methods can predict clinical outcomes, although improvements in these methods that can increase predictivity of clinical outcomes are encouraged and needed. This paper discusses FDA/CDER's view on the opportunities and challenges of using NAMs in drug development especially for regulatory purposes, and also includes examples where NAMs are currently being used in nonclinical safety assessments and where they may supplement and/or enhance current testing methods. FDA/CDER also encourages communication with stakeholders regarding NAMs and is committed to exploring the use of NAMs to improve regulatory efficiency and potentially expedite drug development.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative; Approach; Drug development; FDA; In vitro; Methodology; Regulatory

Year:  2020        PMID: 32325112     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  16 in total

1.  In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: current status and future needs in predicting liver toxicity.

Authors:  Arianna Bassan; Vinicius M Alves; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Andreas Bender; Mark T D Cronin; Kevin P Cross; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Nigel Greene; Raymond Kemper; Marlene T Kim; Moiz Mumtaz; Tobias Noeske; Manuela Pavan; Julia Pletz; Daniel P Russo; Yogesh Sabnis; Markus Schaefer; David T Szabo; Jean-Pierre Valentin; Joerg Wichard; Dominic Williams; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-09

Review 2.  Chemical Effects on Breast Development, Function, and Cancer Risk: Existing Knowledge and New Opportunities.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Bethsaida Cardona; Ruthann A Rudel; Laura N Vandenberg; Ana M Soto; Sofie Christiansen; Linda S Birnbaum; Suzanne E Fenton
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-08-19

3.  Microphysiological Systems Evaluation: Experience of TEX-VAL Tissue Chip Testing Consortium.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Courtney Sakolish; Yuki Kato; Clifford Stephan; Leoncio Vergara; Philip Hewitt; Vasanthi Bhaskaran; Myrtle Davis; Rhiannon N Hardwick; Stephen S Ferguson; Jason P Stanko; Piyush Bajaj; Karissa Adkins; Nisha S Sipes; E Sidney Hunter; Maria T Baltazar; Paul L Carmichael; Kritika Sadh; Richard A Becker
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.109

4.  A Model of Human Small Airway on a Chip for Studies of Subacute Effects of Inhalation Toxicants.

Authors:  Courtney Sakolish; Andrei Georgescu; Dan Dongeun Huh; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.109

5.  Operationalizing the Use of Biofabricated Tissue Models as Preclinical Screening Platforms for Drug Discovery and Development.

Authors:  Olive Jung; Min Jae Song; Marc Ferrer
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.341

Review 6.  Human biomimetic liver microphysiology systems in drug development and precision medicine.

Authors:  Albert Gough; Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez; Lawrence Vernetti; Mo R Ebrahimkhani; Andrew M Stern; D Lansing Taylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 73.082

Review 7.  Microphysiological Systems for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Mihyeon Bae; Hee-Gyeong Yi; Jinah Jang; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Performance of preclinical models in predicting drug-induced liver injury in humans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hubert Dirven; Gunn E Vist; Sricharan Bandhakavi; Jyotsna Mehta; Seneca E Fitch; Pandora Pound; Rebecca Ram; Breanne Kincaid; Cathalijn H C Leenaars; Minjun Chen; Robert A Wright; Katya Tsaioun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Characterizing the reproducibility in using a liver microphysiological system for assaying drug toxicity, metabolism, and accumulation.

Authors:  Andrés Rubiano; Amruta Indapurkar; Ryosuke Yokosawa; Alina Miedzik; Barry Rosenzweig; Ayesha Arefin; Chloe M Moulin; Keri Dame; Neil Hartman; Donna A Volpe; Murali K Matta; David J Hughes; David G Strauss; Tomasz Kostrzewski; Alexandre J S Ribeiro
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 4.689

10.  Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes as an in vitro model in toxicology: strengths and weaknesses for hazard identification and risk characterization.

Authors:  Sarah D Burnett; Alexander D Blanchette; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.936

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.