Literature DB >> 32324954

Weight Stigma and the "Quarantine-15".

Rebecca L Pearl1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32324954      PMCID: PMC7264559          DOI: 10.1002/oby.22850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   9.298


× No keyword cloud information.
The coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 (i.e., COVID‐19) has caused significant disruption in everyday life on a global scale. Because of stay‐at‐home orders and sudden unemployment, millions have found themselves isolated at home without their usual routines. This rise in unstructured time, combined with the enormous stress of the pandemic and its far‐reaching consequences, has led to widespread concerns among the general public about vulnerability to overeating, sedentary behavior, and weight gain. These concerns are reflected in the explosion of social media posts referencing the “quarantine‐15.” Social media can help people to feel connected while practicing social distancing, and comical memes may be a source of laughter, distraction, and validation for many people. Positive social media posts offering tips for maintaining healthy habits during this time of stress and isolation may be helpful to those who are looking for support and encouragement. However, many of the recent coronavirus‐related posts have included text and visual content that convey strong fears of gaining weight or becoming “fat.” A quick search of “quarantine15” yields more than 30,000 Instagram posts, not including thousands of posts using related phrases (e.g., “COVID‐15”) and those found on Twitter and Facebook. Many of these posts display indulgent foods or workout plans. Others feature blatantly weight‐stigmatizing content, such as split‐screen “before‐and‐after quarantine” memes that show people in the “after” screen with an exaggerated amount of weight gain, wearing ill‐fitting clothing in an unflattering manner (sometimes in cartoon form), and eating excessive amounts of food. These types of portrayals elicit common stereotypes that people with obesity are lazy and slovenly, and that they lack self‐control (1). They also imply that having a higher body weight is an intolerable problem to be avoided at all costs (quarantine‐related messages that promote unrealistic thin ideals and extreme weight control practices have been flagged as dangerous by eating disorder advocates as well). Social media posts that stigmatize obesity and mock or diminish real struggles with weight and eating are harmful to people across the weight spectrum, and they may be particularly detrimental to individuals with obesity who are actively trying to manage their weight. Weight stigma is not uncommon in social media outlets such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram (2). Derogating individuals with a higher body weight is more socially acceptable than stigma directed toward other marginalized groups. The perceived controllability of weight, and the subsequent blame placed on those who are viewed as unable to control their weight, embolden people to feel justified when they target persons with obesity in pejorative memes and comments (3). Stereotypical media portrayals of obesity further perpetuate weight‐biased attitudes, which, when directed toward or internalized by persons with obesity, cause a myriad of downstream adverse consequences for health and well‐being (1, 4). Quarantine‐15 social media posts could also potentially undermine efforts to engage in healthy habits. Experimental research has shown that exposure to weight‐stigmatizing media increases caloric consumption among individuals with a higher body weight (5). This may, in part, be due to changes in cortisol in response to the stress of weight stigma (6). Additionally, quarantine‐15 posts that make weight gain seem inevitable, and those that reinforce stereotypes that people with obesity (or those who gain weight) are lazy and have no self‐control, may weaken weight‐related self‐efficacy or confidence in one’s ability to achieve healthy eating and activity goals. Weight‐stigmatizing public health messages elicit less self‐efficacy to engage in healthy behaviors than do more positive health messages (7). Reduced self‐efficacy is associated with poorer long‐term weight control (8). This may signify a “why try” effect (9); when individuals who are struggling with their weight are bombarded with messages that they lack the willpower to stave off weight gain, they may lose belief in their ability to overcome current barriers to maintaining healthy habits, which may ultimately lead them to give up trying altogether. People who internalize negative weight stereotypes and devalue themselves because of their weight (i.e., internalize stigma) might be particularly vulnerable to such messages, as they report lower self‐efficacy and greater self‐blame for their weight (4). Treatment‐seeking individuals with obesity tend to have higher levels of internalized weight stigma and psychological distress related to their weight than those who do not seek treatment (10). Thus, patients who are actively trying to manage their weight may be among those most hurt by social media posts that promote negative weight stereotypes and convey hopeless messages about engaging in healthy behaviors. In the coming months, researchers will likely investigate the effects of social distancing on changes in health habits and weight. As part of this research endeavor, it will be important to characterize the trending weight‐related social media posts and their effects through content analyses, mixed‐methods assessments of patients’ reactions to quarantine‐15 posts (as well as to reports of obesity as a risk factor for coronavirus‐related complications), and experimental studies to determine causal effects of these messages and images on mental and physical health. In addition to research efforts, several steps can be taken to try to counteract the potential harm of these posts. First, in order to drown out unhealthy social media messages, obesity professionals and advocates can try to “flood the zone” with more positive health messages that encourage self‐care and self‐compassion (some obesity and eating disorder groups are already contributing to the social media conversation in this way). As clinicians, we can talk with patients about how stigmatizing messages affect them and help to support them in their health goals. We must bear in mind that many cannot focus on weight management goals at the moment because of increased work demands (especially among essential workers), unforeseen hardships, and immediate concerns for safety and survival. For patients with obesity who are actively in treatment, we can help to boost their self‐efficacy by setting realistic behavioral goals and collaborating on concrete, specific plans to achieve these goals. When patients report weight gain, we can communicate acceptance, without judgment, and validate the unprecedented stressors that we are all facing, while simultaneously helping patients commit to doing their best to maintain their health and well‐being.

Funding agencies

The author’s work is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the NIH (#K23HL140176).

Disclosure

The author declared no conflict of interest.
  9 in total

1.  Positive media portrayals of obese persons: impact on attitudes and image preferences.

Authors:  Rebecca L Pearl; Rebecca M Puhl; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Changes in self-efficacy and dietary adherence: the impact on weight loss in the PREFER study.

Authors:  Melanie T Warziski; Susan M Sereika; Mindi A Styn; Edvin Music; Lora E Burke
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-10-26

3.  Obesity in social media: a mixed methods analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Abby Prestin; Stephen Kunath
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The impact of weight stigma on caloric consumption.

Authors:  Natasha A Schvey; Rebecca M Puhl; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Public reactions to obesity-related health campaigns: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Puhl; Joerg Luedicke; Jamie Lee Peterson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Weight bias internalization and health: a systematic review.

Authors:  R L Pearl; R M Puhl
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 9.213

7.  Psychological correlates of obesity: moving to the next research generation.

Authors:  M A Friedman; K D Brownell
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The stress of stigma: exploring the effect of weight stigma on cortisol reactivity.

Authors:  Natasha A Schvey; Rebecca M Puhl; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  Self-stigma and the "why try" effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices.

Authors:  Patrick W Corrigan; Jonathon E Larson; Nicolas Rüsch
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 49.548

  9 in total
  33 in total

1.  Dietary Behaviours of University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Comparative Analysis of Nursing and Engineering Students.

Authors:  Miriam Araujo-Hernández; E Begoña García-Navarro; María José Cáceres-Titos
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-11

2.  Associations of Use of Social Media and Psychopathology and Body Image in Pre- and Post-surgical Bariatric Samples: a Cross-sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Melissa Butt; Lilly Su; Andrea Rigby
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  COVID-19 stress and eating and drinking behaviors in the United States during the early stages of the pandemic.

Authors:  Jenna R Cummings; Joshua M Ackerman; Julia A Wolfson; Ashley N Gearhardt
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 5.016

Review 4.  Changes of symptoms of eating disorders (ED) and their related psychological health issues during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Haghshomar; Parnian Shobeiri; Serge Brand; Susan L Rossell; Ava Akhavan Malayeri; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 5.  A mixed-studies systematic review of the experiences of body image, disordered eating, and eating disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jekaterina Schneider; Georgina Pegram; Benjamin Gibson; Deborah Talamonti; Aline Tinoco; Nadia Craddock; Emily Matheson; Mark Forshaw
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.791

6.  Obesity, eating behavior and physical activity during COVID-19 lockdown: A study of UK adults.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Emma Boyland; Anna Chisholm; Joanne Harrold; Niamh G Maloney; Lucile Marty; Bethan R Mead; Rob Noonan; Charlotte A Hardman
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  COVID-19 Related Distress Is Associated With Alcohol Problems, Social Media and Food Addiction Symptoms: Insights From the Italian Experience During the Lockdown.

Authors:  Angelo Panno; Giuseppe Alessio Carbone; Chiara Massullo; Benedetto Farina; Claudio Imperatori
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Disordered Eating Behavior: Qualitative Analysis of Social Media Posts.

Authors:  Sara K Nutley; Alyssa M Falise; Rebecca Henderson; Vasiliki Apostolou; Carol A Mathews; Catherine W Striley
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2021-01-27

9.  Dietary Habits before and during the COVID-19 Epidemic in Selected European Countries.

Authors:  Magdalena Skotnicka; Kaja Karwowska; Filip Kłobukowski; Eliza Wasilewska; Sylwia Małgorzewicz
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the United States: A Multicenter Electronic Health Records Network Study.

Authors:  Shailendra Singh; Mohammad Bilal; Haig Pakhchanian; Rahul Raiker; Gursimran S Kochhar; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.