Literature DB >> 23790987

Public reactions to obesity-related health campaigns: a randomized controlled trial.

Rebecca Puhl1, Joerg Luedicke2, Jamie Lee Peterson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous obesity-related health campaigns throughout the U.S., public perceptions of these campaigns have not been formally assessed. In addition, several recent publicized campaigns have come under criticism in the popular media for reinforcing stigmatization of obese people. Thus, research in this area is warranted.
PURPOSE: To systematically assess public perceptions of recent obesity-related public health campaigns in the U.S.
DESIGN: RCT. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The data were collected online in summer 2012 from a nationally representative sample of American adults (N=1085). INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to view 10 obesity-related health campaigns that were pretested and publicly criticized as being stigmatizing of obese people, or 10 campaigns that contained more-neutral content. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants provided evaluations of each of the campaigns regarding the extent to which campaigns were rated to be stigmatizing of obese people, motivating for improving lifestyle behaviors, and promoting of self-efficacy for healthy behavior change. Participants additionally evaluated the appropriateness of the visual content depicted in each campaign. Analysis was completed in 2012.
RESULTS: Stigmatizing campaigns were no more likely to instill motivation for improving lifestyle behaviors among participants than campaigns that were more neutral (OR=1.095, 95% CI=0.736, 1.630). Stigmatizing campaigns were also rated as inducing less self-efficacy (adjusted mean difference = -0.171 SD, 95% CI= -0.266, -0.076) and having less-appropriate visual content compared to less stigmatizing campaigns (adjusted difference in probability = -0.092, 95% CI= -0.124, -0.059). These findings remained consistent regardless of participants' body weight, and were generally consistent across sociodemographic predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for careful selection of language and visual content used in obesity-related health campaigns, and provides support for efforts to portray obese people in a nonstigmatizing manner.
Copyright © 2013 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23790987     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  24 in total

1.  Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention policy.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Jeff Niederdeppe; Colleen L Barry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Obesity in social media: a mixed methods analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Abby Prestin; Stephen Kunath
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Behaviors and motivations for weight loss in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Callie Lambert Brown; Joseph A Skelton; Eliana M Perrin; Asheley Cockrell Skinner
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 4.  Health Consequences of Weight Stigma: Implications for Obesity Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca Puhl; Young Suh
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-06

5.  Characterizing fear of weight gain and sensitivity to weight gain in individuals seeking weight loss treatment.

Authors:  Anastasia J Bullock; Jessica Barber; Rachel D Barnes
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.652

6.  Identifiable Characteristics and Potentially Malleable Beliefs Predict Stigmatizing Attributions Toward Persons With Alzheimer's Disease Dementia: Results of a Survey of the U.S. General Public.

Authors:  Shana D Stites; Rebecca Johnson; Kristin Harkins; Pamela Sankar; Dawei Xie; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-12-29

7.  The relative contributions of biomarkers, disease modifying treatment, and dementia severity to Alzheimer's stigma: A vignette-based experiment.

Authors:  Shana D Stites; Jeanine Gill; Emily A Largent; Kristin Harkins; Pamela Sankar; Abba Krieger; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  A critical analysis of obesity prevention policies and strategies.

Authors:  Ximena Ramos Salas; Mary Forhan; Timothy Caulfield; Arya M Sharma; Kim Raine
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Finding the keys to successful adult-targeted advertisements on obesity prevention: an experimental audience testing study.

Authors:  Helen Dixon; Maree Scully; Sarah Durkin; Emily Brennan; Trish Cotter; Sarah Maloney; Blythe J O'Hara; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Perceived discrimination and favourable regard toward underweight, normal weight and obese eating disorder sufferers: implications for obesity and eating disorder population health campaigns.

Authors:  Anita Star; Phillipa Hay; Frances Quirk; Jonathan Mond
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2015-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.