Literature DB >> 32322982

Course of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed during pregnancy.

Donata Grimm1,2, Isabelle Lang3, Katharina Prieske3, Anna Jaeger3, Volkmar Müller3, Sascha Kuerti3, Eike Burandt4, Susanne Lezius5, Barbara Schmalfeldt3, Linn Woelber3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Management of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN grade 2 or 3 (CIN2-3)] diagnosed during pregnancy is controversial. Monitoring with colposcopy and cytology every 8-12 weeks is advised by the most current guidelines. STUDY
DESIGN: This study analyzes the course of disease in pregnant women with abnormal cytologies or clinically suspicious cervixes.
RESULTS: In total, 139 pregnant women, at a median age of 31 years (range 19-49), treated at the Colposcopy Unit of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2011 and 2017 were identified. During pregnancy, at least one biopsy was performed on 70.5% of patients. In 84.7% of cases, CIN2-3 (CIN2 n = 14 (14.3%), CIN3 n = 69 (70.4%)) was detected, 7.1% (n = 7) of women were diagnosed with CIN1, while no dysplasia was found in 8.2% (n = 8) of cases. No interventions were necessary during pregnancy. Despite explicit invitation, only 72.3% of women with CIN2-3 attended postpartal consultations. While 61.7% showed persistent lesions, 5% were diagnosed with CIN1 and 33.3% with complete remission. During pregnancy, 68.7% of women with prepartal CIN2-3 were tested for HPV infection. Later, 49.1% were followed up postpartally by means of HPV testing and histology. HPV clearance was observed in 36.4% of women with complete histological remission. Postpartum conization was performed on 44.6% of patients with prepartal CIN2-3 diagnosis. CIN2-3 was histologically confirmed in 97.3% cases. Progression from persistent CIN3 to microinvasive carcinoma was observed in a single case.
CONCLUSIONS: High-grade CIN lesions, diagnosed during pregnancy, show a high rate of regression postpartum; whereas, progression to carcinoma is rare. Close and continuous monitoring rarely has any therapeutic consequences. Compliance for postpartal follow-up needs to be improved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; High-grade CIN; Pregnancy; Progression; Regression; Remission

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32322982     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05518-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  35 in total

1.  [Management of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasm during pregnancy].

Authors:  S Douvier; L Filipuzzi; P Sagot
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2003-10

2.  Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Andrew G Glass; Brenda B Rush
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Incidence and obstetrical outcomes of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer in pregnancy: a population-based study on 8.8 million births.

Authors:  Hani Al-Halal; Abbas Kezouh; Haim A Abenhaim
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology.

Authors:  James Bentley
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2012-12

6.  Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence.

Authors:  Susanne K Kjær; Kirsten Frederiksen; Christian Munk; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1.

Authors:  J Jordan; M Arbyn; P Martin-Hirsch; U Schenck; J-J Baldauf; D Da Silva; A Anttila; P Nieminen; W Prendiville
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.073

8.  Cervical cytology during pregnancy--comparison with non-pregnant women and management of pregnant women with abnormal cytology.

Authors:  Yutaka Morimura; Keiya Fujimori; Shu Soeda; Toshihiro Hashimoto; Yoshimasa Takano; Hidekazu Yamada; Kaoru Yanagida; Akira Sato
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2002-06

Review 9.  Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: the state of the art.

Authors:  M Origoni; S Salvatore; A Perino; G Cucinella; M Candiani
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.507

10.  Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3 Level, AWMF Register Number 015/027OL, December 2017) - Part 2 on Triage, Treatment and Follow-up.

Authors:  Peter Hillemanns; Klaus Friese; Christian Dannecker; Stefanie Klug; Ulrike Seifert; Thomas Iftner; Juliane Hädicke; Thomas Löning; Lars Horn; Dietmar Schmidt; Hans Ikenberg; Manfred Steiner; Ulrich Freitag; Uwe Siebert; Gaby Sroczynski; Willi Sauerbrei; Matthias W Beckmann; Marion Gebhardt; Michael Friedrich; Karsten Münstedt; Achim Schneider; Andreas Kaufmann; K Ulrich Petry; Axel P A Schäfer; Michael Pawlita; Joachim Weis; Anja Mehnert; Mathias Fehr; Christoph Grimm; Olaf Reich; Marc Arbyn; Jos Kleijnen; Simone Wesselmann; Monika Nothacker; Markus Follmann; Thomas Langer; Matthias Jentschke
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.915

View more
  3 in total

1.  Natural history of histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Yu Xu; Wu Huang; Yi Du; Cui Hu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Invasive Cervical Carcinoma by Cervical Biopsy under Colposcopy and Analysis of Factors Influencing.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Jing Wang; Hua Mei
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Influences on pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Carolin Müller; Gilda Schmidt; Ingolf Juhasz-Böss; Lisa Jung; Sarah Huwer; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Stephanie Juhasz-Böss
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.344

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.