Literature DB >> 19040546

European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1.

J Jordan1, M Arbyn, P Martin-Hirsch, U Schenck, J-J Baldauf, D Da Silva, A Anttila, P Nieminen, W Prendiville.   

Abstract

The current paper presents the first part of Chapter 6 of the second edition of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. It provides guidance on how to manage women with abnormal cervical cytology. Throughout this article the Bethesda system is used for cervical cytology terminology, as the European guidelines have recommended that all systems should at least be translated into that terminology while cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is used for histological biopsies (Cytopathology 2007; 18:213-9). A woman with a high-grade cytological lesion, a repeated low-grade lesion or with an equivocal cytology result and a positive human papillomavirus (HPV) test should be referred for colposcopy. The role of the colposcopist is to identify the source of the abnormal cells and to make an informed decision as to whether or not any treatment is required. If a patient requires treatment the colposcopist will decide which is the most appropriate method of treatment for each individual woman. The colposcopist should also organize appropriate follow-up for each woman seen. Reflex testing for high-risk HPV types of women with atypical squamous cells (ASC) of undetermined significance with referral for colposcopy of women who test positive is a first option. Repeat cytology is a second possibility. Direct referral to a gynaecologist should be restricted to special circumstances. Follow-up of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion is more difficult because currently there is no evidence to support any method of management as being optimal; repeat cytology and colposcopy are options, but HPV testing is not sufficiently selective, unless for older women. Women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) should be referred without triage. Women with glandular lesions require particular attention. In a subsequent issue of Cytopathology, the second part of Chapter 6 will be presented, with recommendations for management and treatment of histologically confirmed intraepithelial neoplasia and guidance for follow-up of special cases such as women who are pregnant, postmenopausal or immunocompromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19040546     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00623.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  37 in total

Review 1.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: biomarkers for improved prevention efforts.

Authors:  Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Patricia Luhn; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.165

2.  High-grade cervical lesions among women attending a reference clinic in Brazil: associated factors and comparison among screening methods.

Authors:  Neide T Boldrini; Luciana B Freitas; Amanda R Coutinho; Flavia Z Loureiro; Liliana C Spano; Angélica E Miranda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Increase in viral load, viral integration, and gain of telomerase genes during uterine cervical carcinogenesis can be simultaneously assessed by the HPV 16/18 MLPA-assay.

Authors:  Wendy Theelen; Ernst-Jan M Speel; Michael Herfs; Martin Reijans; Guus Simons; Els V Meulemans; Marcella M Baldewijns; Frans C S Ramaekers; Joan Somja; Philippe Delvenne; Anton H N Hopman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Age-specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional Pap smears and liquid-based cytology: data from two randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  P E Castle; J Bulten; M Confortini; P Klinkhamer; A Pellegrini; A G Siebers; G Ronco; M Arbyn
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Cytology and human papillomavirus testing 6 to 12 months after ASCUS or LSIL cytology in organized screening to predict high-grade cervical neoplasia between screening rounds.

Authors:  Ameli Tropé; Katrine D Sjøborg; Mari Nygård; Kjetil Røysland; Suzanne Campbell; G Cecilie Alfsen; Christine M Jonassen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The use of biomarkers and HPV genotyping to improve diagnostic accuracy in women with a transformation zone type 3.

Authors:  Kristyn Manley; Amit Patel; Joya Pawade; Susan Glew; Katherine Hunt; Nichole Villeneuve; Pinias Mukonoweshuro; Samantha Thompson; Helen Hoskins; Andres López-Bernal; Andrew Wills
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second edition--summary document.

Authors:  M Arbyn; A Anttila; J Jordan; G Ronco; U Schenck; N Segnan; H Wiener; A Herbert; L von Karsa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Cost-effective management of women with minor cervical lesions: Revisiting the application of HPV DNA testing.

Authors:  Kine Pedersen; Emily A Burger; Stephen Sy; Ivar S Kristiansen; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Course of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed during pregnancy.

Authors:  Donata Grimm; Isabelle Lang; Katharina Prieske; Anna Jaeger; Volkmar Müller; Sascha Kuerti; Eike Burandt; Susanne Lezius; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Linn Woelber
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Prevalence and predictors of colposcopic-histopathologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected women in India.

Authors:  Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Ramesh A Bhosale; Smita N Joshi; Anita N Kavatkar; Chandraprabha A Nagwanshi; Rohini S Kelkar; Cathy A Jenkins; Bryan E Shepherd; Seema Sahay; Arun R Risbud; Sten H Vermund; Sanjay M Mehendale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.