| Literature DB >> 32322447 |
Şeyma Demirhan Aydın1, Mine Pakyürek1.
Abstract
This study was carried out to determine the possible heavy metal accumulation in fruits and leaves of Zivzik pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) grown in two different roadside orchards located in Pirinçli and Kapılı villages of Siirt province, Turkey. Leaf and fruit samples were collected from trees located at 0, 50, 100 m distances from the main roads. Plant samples were analyzed for cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb) and chromium (Cr) concentrations. The Co, Ni, Cd, Pb and Cr concentrations of fruit samples collected from Pirinçli village were ranged from 0.082 to 0.238 mg kg-1, from 1.160 to 1.559 mg kg-1, from 0.087 to 0.179 mg kg-1, 0.326 to 0.449 mg kg-1 and 0.606 to 1.054 mg kg-1, respectively. The Co, Ni, Cd, Pb and Cr concentrations of fruit samples from Kapılı village were between 0.085 and 0.137 mg kg-1, 1.042 and 1.123 mg kg-1, 0.037 and 0.076 mg kg-1, 0.277 and 0.520 mg kg-1 and 0.762 and 0.932 mg kg-1, respectively. Heavy metal concentrations of leaf samples from Pirinçli village varied from 0.191 to 0.227 mg Co kg-1, 2.201 to 3.547 mg Ni kg-1, 0.051 to 0.098 mg Cd kg-1, 0.535 to 0.749 mg Pb kg-1 and from 1.444 to 2.017 mg Cr kg-1. Similarly, the heavy metal concentration of leaf samples from Kapılı villages were between 0.213 and 0.217 mg Co kg-1, 2.160 and 2.511 mg Ni kg-1, 0.058 and 0.114 mg Cd kg-1, 0.579 and 0.676 mg Pb kg-1 and 1.688 and 1.518 mg Cr kg-1. The Co, Ni and Cr concentrations in fruit samples collected from 0, 50 and 100 meters to the main road in Pirinçli village were at statistically significant level, while only Ni concentration in leaf samples collected from 0, 50 and 100 meters to the main road was at significant level. In contrast, heavy metal concentrations in fruit and leaf samples collected from 0, 50 and 100 m to the main road in Kapılı village were not statistically significant level. ©2020 Demirhan Aydın and Pakyürek.Entities:
Keywords: Fruit; Heavy metal; Pollution; Pomegranate; Punica granatum L.; Roadside; Traffic
Year: 2020 PMID: 32322447 PMCID: PMC7164423 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8990
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Satellige images of Kapılı and Pirinçli villages. Map credit: ©Google 2020 CNES/Airbus. Landsat/Copernicus. Maxar Technologies. Map data.
The results for variance analysis of fruit samples from the Pirinçli and Kapılı Villages.
| Distance | 2 | 0.019 | 8.78 | 0.017 | 0.002 | 0.66 | 0.552 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.002 | 0.003 | |||||
| Distance | 2 | 0.125 | 11.53 | 0.009 | 0.005 | 0.25 | 0.787 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.011 | 0.021 | |||||
| Distance | 2 | 0.007 | 0.53 | 0.614 | 0.001 | 1.10 | 0.393 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.014 | 0.001 | |||||
| Distance | 2 | 0.013 | 0.62 | 0.570 | 0.064 | 1.89 | 0.231 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.020 | 0.034 | |||||
| Distance | 2 | 0.152 | 19.84 | 0.002 | 0.028 | 0.45 | 0.658 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.008 | 0.063 | |||||
Notes.
Significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Descriptive statistics of heavy metal concentrations (mg kg−1) in fruit samples by the distance.
| Pirinçli Village | |||||
| 0 m | 0.238 ± 0.079 | 1.160 ± 0.068 b | 0.102 ± 0.006 | 0.351 ± 0.019 | 1.054 ± 0.121 a |
| 50 m | 0.196 ± 0.021 a | 1.285 ± 0.088 b | 0.087 ± 0.008 | 0.449 ± 0.037 | 0.606 ± 0.031 c |
| 100 m | 0.082 ± 0.004 b | 1.559 ± 0.142 a | 0.179 ± 0.204 | 0.326 ± 0.244 | 0.796 ± 0.085 b |
| Mean | 0.172 ± 0.081 | 1.334 ± 0.198 | 0.123 ± 0.111 | 0.375 ± 0.136 | 0.819 ± 0.209 |
| Kapılı Village | |||||
| 0 m | 0.137 ± 0.089 | 1.042 ± 0.163 | 0.068 ± 0.045 | 0.277 ± 0.192 | 0.762 ± 0.160 |
| 50 m | 0.101 ± 0.033 | 1.094 ± 0.112 | 0.076 ± 0.030 | 0.520 ± 0.225 | 0.932 ± 0.398 |
| 100 m | 0.085 ± 0.026 | 1.123 ± 0.151 | 0.037 ± 0.023 | 0.257 ± 0.121 | 0.765 ± 0.071 |
| Mean | 0.170 ± 0.054 | 0.094 ± 0.638 | 0.060 ± 0.034 | 0.351 ± 0.204 | 0.820 ± 0.233 |
Notes.
Standard deviation values.
The differences between the means in the same column are shown in separate letters (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Heavy metal percentages of fruit samples collected at three different distances to the roadside.
(A) Heavy metal percentages of fruit samples collected at 0 m distance to the roadside. (B) Heavy metal percentages of fruit samples collected at 50 m distance to the roadside. (C) Heavy metal percentages of fruit samples collected at 100 m distance to the roadside.
Correlation matrix between heavy metal concentrations (mg kg−1) in fruit samples (n = 18).
| −0.069 | 0.079 | 0.320 | 0.256 | |
| 0.656 | 0.023 | 0.059 | ||
| −0.192 | 0.107 | |||
| 0.264 |
Notes.
Significant at p ≤ 0.01.
The results for variance analysis of leaf samples from Pirinçli and Kapılı villages.
| Distance | 2 | 0.001 | 0.353 | 0.716 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.991 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.003 | 0.002 | |||||
| Distance | 2 | 1,443 | 28.092 | 0.001 | 0.094 | 1.015 | 0.417 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.051 | 0.093 | |||||
| Distance | 2 | 0.002 | 1.140 | 0.381 | 0.002 | 1.278 | 0.345 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.002 | 0.002 | |||||
| Distance | 2 | 0.042 | 3.358 | 0.105 | 0.007 | 0.840 | 0.477 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.012 | 0.009 | |||||
| Distance | 2 | 0.247 | 0.869 | 0.466 | 0.001 | 0.021 | 0.979 | |
| Error | 6 | 0.285 | 0.031 | |||||
Notes.
Significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Descriptive statistics of heavy metal concentrations (mg kg−1) in leaf samples by the distance.
| Pirinçli Village | |||||
| 0 m | 0.227 ± 0.094 | 2.201 ± 0.297 b | 0.051 ± 0.011 | 0.535 ± 0.166 | 1.444 ± 0.376 |
| 50 m | 0.191 ± 0.020 | 2.582 ± 0.099 b | 0.098 ± 0.058 | 0.557 ± 0.066 | 1.763 ± 0.818 |
| 100 m | 0.225 ± 0.032 | 3.547 ± 0.237 a | 0.085 ± 0.032 | 0.749 ± 0.073 | 2.017 ± 0.207 |
| Mean | 0.215 ± 0.054 | 2.777 ± 0.632 | 0.078 ± 0.040 | 0.614 ± 0.140 | 1.742 ± 0.525 |
| Kapılı Village | |||||
| 0 m | 0.217 ± 0.034 | 2.160 ± 0.287 | 0.082 ± 0.051 | 0.579 ± 0.077 | 1.503 ± 0.109 |
| 50 m | 0.217 ± 0.058 | 2.295 ± 0.407 | 0.058 ± 0.009 | 0.618 ± 0.064 | 1.518 ± 0.264 |
| 100 m | 0.213 ± 0.024 | 2.511 ± 0.176 | 0.114 ± 0.053 | 0.676 ± 0.125 | 1.488 ± 0.107 |
| Mean | 0.216 ± 0.036 | 2.322 ± 0.305 | 0.085 ± 0.044 | 0.625 ± 0.090 | 1.503 ± 0.153 |
Notes.
Standard deviation values.
Figure 3Heavy metal percentages of leaf samples collected from three varied distances to the roadside.
(A) Heavy metal percentages of leaf samples collected at 0 m distance to the roadside. (B) Heavy metal percentages of leaf samples collected at 50 m distance to the roadside. (C) Heavy metals percentages of leaf samples collected at 100 m distance to the roadside.
Correlation matrix between heavy metal concentrations (mg kg−1) of leaf samples (n = 18).
| Co | 0.267 | 0.188 | 0.259 | −0.215 |
| Ni | 0.206 | 0.586 | 0.541 | |
| Cd | 0.342 | −0.194 | ||
| Pb | 0.413 |
Notes.
Significant at p ≤ 0.05.